HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:51:51 GMT
Server: Apache
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Cache-Control: private, s-maxage=0, max-age=0, must-revalidate
Content-Language: en
Vary: Accept-Encoding,Cookie
Last-Modified: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:54:59 GMT
Content-Length: 368109
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Age: 10573
X-Cache: HIT from cp1016.eqiad.wmnet
X-Cache-Lookup: HIT from cp1016.eqiad.wmnet:3128
X-Cache: MISS from cp1012.eqiad.wmnet
X-Cache-Lookup: MISS from cp1012.eqiad.wmnet:80
Connection: close

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html lang="en" dir="ltr" class="client-nojs" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>Conservatism in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
<meta name="generator" content="MediaWiki 1.18wmf1" />
<link rel="alternate" type="application/x-wiki" title="Edit this page" href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit" />
<link rel="edit" title="Edit this page" href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit" />
<link rel="apple-touch-icon" href="//en.wikipedia.org/apple-touch-icon.png" />
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="/favicon.ico" />
<link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="/w/opensearch_desc.php" title="Wikipedia (en)" />
<link rel="EditURI" type="application/rsd+xml" href="//en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=rsd" />
<link rel="copyright" href="//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/" />
<link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" title="Wikipedia Atom feed" href="/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&amp;feed=atom" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="//bits.wikimedia.org/en.wikipedia.org/load.php?debug=false&amp;lang=en&amp;modules=ext.wikihiero%7Cmediawiki.legacy.commonPrint%2Cshared%7Cskins.vector&amp;only=styles&amp;skin=vector&amp;*" type="text/css" media="all" />
<meta name="ResourceLoaderDynamicStyles" content="" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="//bits.wikimedia.org/en.wikipedia.org/load.php?debug=false&amp;lang=en&amp;modules=site&amp;only=styles&amp;skin=vector&amp;*" type="text/css" media="all" />
<style type="text/css" media="all">a:lang(ar),a:lang(ckb),a:lang(fa),a:lang(kk-arab),a:lang(mzn),a:lang(ps),a:lang(ur){text-decoration:none}a.new,#quickbar a.new{color:#ba0000}

/* cache key: enwiki:resourceloader:filter:minify-css:4:c88e2bcd56513749bec09a7e29cb3ffa */</style>
<script src="//bits.wikimedia.org/en.wikipedia.org/load.php?debug=false&amp;lang=en&amp;modules=startup&amp;only=scripts&amp;skin=vector&amp;*" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">if ( window.mediaWiki ) {
	mw.config.set({"wgCanonicalNamespace": "", "wgCanonicalSpecialPageName": false, "wgNamespaceNumber": 0, "wgPageName": "Conservatism_in_the_United_States", "wgTitle": "Conservatism in the United States", "wgCurRevisionId": 478771784, "wgArticleId": 2298740, "wgIsArticle": true, "wgAction": "view", "wgUserName": null, "wgUserGroups": ["*"], "wgCategories": ["All pages needing factual verification", "Wikipedia articles needing factual verification from September 2011", "All articles with unsourced statements", "Articles with unsourced statements from November 2011", "Articles needing additional references from September 2010", "All articles needing additional references", "Articles with unsourced statements from September 2010", "Articles with unsourced statements from June 2010", "Articles needing cleanup from August 2011", "All pages needing cleanup", "Wikipedia laundry list cleanup from August 2011", "Conservatism in the United States"], "wgBreakFrames": false, "wgRestrictionEdit": [], "wgRestrictionMove": [], "wgSearchNamespaces": [0], "wgFlaggedRevsParams": {"tags": {"status": {"levels": 1, "quality": 2, "pristine": 3}}}, "wgStableRevisionId": null, "wgVectorEnabledModules": {"collapsiblenav": true, "collapsibletabs": true, "editwarning": true, "expandablesearch": false, "footercleanup": false, "sectioneditlinks": false, "simplesearch": true, "experiments": true}, "wgWikiEditorEnabledModules": {"toolbar": true, "dialogs": true, "hidesig": true, "templateEditor": false, "templates": false, "preview": false, "previewDialog": false, "publish": false, "toc": false}, "wgTrackingToken": "79552fcbc47d9d68efea2ca6072b04ab", "wikilove-recipient": "", "wikilove-edittoken": "+\\", "wikilove-anon": 0, "mbEmailEnabled": true, "mbUserEmail": false, "mbIsEmailConfirmationPending": false, "Geo": {"city": "", "country": ""}, "wgNoticeProject": "wikipedia"});
}
</script><script type="text/javascript">if ( window.mediaWiki ) {
	mw.loader.load(["mediawiki.page.startup"]);
}
</script>
<!--[if lt IE 7]><style type="text/css">body{behavior:url("/w/skins-1.18/vector/csshover.min.htc")}</style><![endif]--></head>
<body class="mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr ns-0 ns-subject page-Conservatism_in_the_United_States action-view skin-vector">
		<div id="mw-page-base" class="noprint"></div>
		<div id="mw-head-base" class="noprint"></div>
		<!-- content -->
		<div id="content">
			<a id="top"></a>
			<div id="mw-js-message" style="display:none;"></div>
						<!-- sitenotice -->
			<div id="siteNotice"><!-- centralNotice loads here --></div>
			<!-- /sitenotice -->
						<!-- firstHeading -->
			<h1 id="firstHeading" class="firstHeading">Conservatism in the United States</h1>
			<!-- /firstHeading -->
			<!-- bodyContent -->
			<div id="bodyContent">
								<!-- tagline -->
				<div id="siteSub">From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</div>
				<!-- /tagline -->
								<!-- subtitle -->
				<div id="contentSub"></div>
				<!-- /subtitle -->
																<!-- jumpto -->
				<div id="jump-to-nav">
					Jump to: <a href="#mw-head">navigation</a>,
					<a href="#p-search">search</a>
				</div>
				<!-- /jumpto -->
								<!-- bodycontent -->
				<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div class="dablink">For related and other uses, see <a href="/wiki/Conservatism_(disambiguation)" title="Conservatism (disambiguation)">Conservatism (disambiguation)</a>.</div>
<table class="vertical-navbox nowraplinks" cellspacing="0" style="float: right; clear: right; color: black; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid #aaa; width:&#160;; margin: 0 0 1.0em 1.0em; padding: 0.2em; border-spacing: 0.4em 0; text-align: center; line-height: 1.4em; font-size: 88%; width:18.0em;" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
<td class="" style="padding-top: 0.4em; line-height: 1.2em;">Part of a <a href="/wiki/Category:Conservatism" title="Category:Conservatism">series</a> on</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th class="" style="padding: 0.2em 0.4em 0.2em; padding-top: 0; font-size: 145%; line-height: 1.2em; font-weight: bold; background:#3A5FCD; padding-bottom:0; font-size:200%; font-weight:normal; color:white;"><strong class="selflink"><span style="color:white">Conservatism<br />
<small><small>in the United States</small></small></span></strong></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="" style="padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;&#160;;">
<div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="border:none;padding:0;">
<div class="NavHead" style="font-size:105%; background:white; color:#3A5FCD;">Schools</div>
<div class="NavContent" style="font-size:105%; padding:0.2em 0 0.4em; text-align:center;"><a href="/wiki/Neoconservatism" title="Neoconservatism">Neoconservatism</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Paleoconservatism" title="Paleoconservatism">Paleoconservatism</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Fusionism" title="Fusionism">Fusionism</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Social_conservatism_in_the_United_States" title="Social conservatism in the United States">Social Conservatism</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="" style="padding-bottom: 0.2em;&#160;;">
<div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="border:none;padding:0;">
<div class="NavHead" style="font-size:105%; background:white; color:#3A5FCD;">Principles</div>
<div class="NavContent" style="font-size:105%; padding:0.2em 0 0.4em; text-align:center; padding:0.2em 0 0.4em; text-align:center;"><a href="/wiki/Tradition" title="Tradition">Tradition</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Republicanism_in_the_United_States" title="Republicanism in the United States">Republicanism</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Rule_of_law" title="Rule of law">Rule of law</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Limited_government" title="Limited government">Limited government</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Free_market" title="Free market">Free market</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Family_values" title="Family values">Family values</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Judeo-Christian" title="Judeo-Christian">Judeo-Christian</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="" style="padding-bottom: 0.2em;&#160;;">
<div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="border:none;padding:0;">
<div class="NavHead" style="font-size:105%; background:white; color:#3A5FCD;">History</div>
<div class="NavContent" style="font-size:105%; padding:0.2em 0 0.4em; text-align:center; padding:0.2em 0 0.4em; text-align:center;"><a href="/wiki/Timeline_of_modern_American_conservatism" title="Timeline of modern American conservatism">Timeline</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="" style="padding-bottom: 0.2em;&#160;;">
<div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="border:none;padding:0;">
<div class="NavHead" style="font-size:105%; background:white; color:#3A5FCD;">People</div>
<div class="NavContent" style="font-size:105%; padding:0.2em 0 0.4em; text-align:center; padding:0.2em 0 0.4em; text-align:center;"><a href="/wiki/Calvin_Coolidge" title="Calvin Coolidge">Calvin Coolidge</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Herbert_Hoover" title="Herbert Hoover">Herbert Hoover</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Dwight_D._Eisenhower" title="Dwight D. Eisenhower">Dwight D. Eisenhower</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Richard_Nixon" title="Richard Nixon">Richard Nixon</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Gerald_Ford" title="Gerald Ford">Gerald Ford</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Ronald_Reagan" title="Ronald Reagan">Ronald Reagan</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/George_H._W._Bush" title="George H. W. Bush">George H. W. Bush</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/George_W._Bush" title="George W. Bush">George W. Bush</a> &#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Barry_Goldwater" title="Barry Goldwater">Barry Goldwater</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Irving_Babbitt" title="Irving Babbitt">Irving Babbitt</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Russell_Kirk" title="Russell Kirk">Russell Kirk</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/William_F._Buckley,_Jr." title="William F. Buckley, Jr.">William F. Buckley, Jr.</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Irving_Kristol" title="Irving Kristol">Irving Kristol</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Jerry_Falwell" title="Jerry Falwell">Jerry Falwell</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="" style="padding-bottom: 0.2em;&#160;;">
<div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="border:none;padding:0;">
<div class="NavHead" style="font-size:105%; background:white; color:#3A5FCD;"><a href="/wiki/Category:Conservative_parties_in_the_United_States" title="Category:Conservative parties in the United States">Parties</a></div>
<div class="NavContent" style="font-size:105%; padding:0.2em 0 0.4em; text-align:center; padding:0.2em 0 0.4em; text-align:center;"><a href="/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)" title="Republican Party (United States)">Republican Party</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Constitution_Party_(United_States)" title="Constitution Party (United States)">Constitution Party</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span>  <a href="/wiki/American_Party_(1969)" title="American Party (1969)">The American Party</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="" style="padding-bottom: 0.2em;&#160;;">
<div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="border:none;padding:0;">
<div class="NavHead" style="font-size:105%; background:white; color:#3A5FCD;">Variants</div>
<div class="NavContent" style="font-size:105%; padding:0.2em 0 0.4em; text-align:center; padding:0.2em 0 0.4em; text-align:center;"><a href="/wiki/Old_Right_(United_States)" title="Old Right (United States)">Old Right</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Black_conservatism_in_the_United_States" title="Black conservatism in the United States">Black conservatism</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Christian_Right" title="Christian Right" class="mw-redirect">Christian Right</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Reaganomics" title="Reaganomics">Reaganomics</a>&#160;<span style="font-weight:bold;">·</span> <a href="/wiki/Tea_Party_movement" title="Tea Party movement">Tea Party movement</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="" style="padding-bottom: 0.2em;&#160;;">
<div class="NavFrame collapsed" style="border:none;padding:0;">
<div class="NavHead" style="font-size:105%; background:white; color:#3A5FCD;">See also</div>
<div class="NavContent" style="font-size:105%; padding:0.2em 0 0.4em; text-align:center; padding:0.2em 0 0.4em; text-align:center;"><a href="/wiki/Bibliography_of_conservatism_in_the_United_States" title="Bibliography of conservatism in the United States">Bibliography</a></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="" style="padding-bottom: 0.2em;&#160;; padding: 0; line-height: 0.4em">&#160;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="" style="padding: 0.3em 0.4em 0.3em; font-weight: bold; border-top: 1px solid #aaa; border-bottom: 1px solid #aaa; padding-bottom:0.22em; border-top:1px solid #aaa; border-bottom:1px solid #aaa;"><b><a href="/wiki/Portal:Conservatism" title="Portal:Conservatism"><img alt="DodgerBlue flag waving.svg" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/DodgerBlue_flag_waving.svg/16px-DodgerBlue_flag_waving.svg.png" width="16" height="17" /></a> <a href="/wiki/Portal:Conservatism" title="Portal:Conservatism">Conservatism Portal</a></b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: right; font-size: 115%; padding-top: 0.6em;">
<div class="noprint plainlinks hlist navbar mini" style="">
<ul>
<li class="nv-view"><a href="/wiki/Template:Conservatism_US" title="Template:Conservatism US"><span title="View this template" style="">v</span></a></li>
<li class="nv-talk"><a href="/wiki/Template_talk:Conservatism_US" title="Template talk:Conservatism US"><span title="Discuss this template" style="">t</span></a></li>
<li class="nv-edit"><a class="external text" href="//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Conservatism_US&amp;action=edit"><span title="Edit this template" style="">e</span></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>Conservatism in the United States</b> has played an important role in American politics since the 1950s.<sup id="cite_ref-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-0"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a></sup> Historian Gregory Schneider identifies several constants in American conservatism: respect for tradition, support of <a href="/wiki/Republicanism_in_the_United_States" title="Republicanism in the United States">republicanism</a>, preservation of "the rule of law and the Christian religion", and a defense of "Western civilization from the challenges of modernist culture and totalitarian governments."<sup id="cite_ref-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-1"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a></sup> The history of American conservatism has been marked by tensions and competing ideologies. Economic conservatives and libertarians favor <a href="/wiki/Small_government" title="Small government">small government</a>, low taxes, limited regulation, and free enterprise. Social conservatives see traditional social values as threatened by secularism, so they support <a href="/wiki/School_prayer" title="School prayer">school prayer</a> and <a href="/wiki/Opposition_to_the_legalization_of_abortion" title="Opposition to the legalization of abortion">oppose abortion</a> and/or <a href="/wiki/Opponents_of_same-sex_marriage_in_the_United_States" title="Opponents of same-sex marriage in the United States">homosexuality</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-Social_2-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Social-2"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Neoconservatives" title="Neoconservatives" class="mw-redirect">Neoconservatives</a> want to expand American ideals throughout the world and show a strong support for Israel.<sup id="cite_ref-3" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-3"><span>[</span>4<span>]</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Paleoconservatives" title="Paleoconservatives" class="mw-redirect">Paleoconservatives</a>, in opposition to multiculturalism, press for restrictions on immigration.<sup id="cite_ref-Paleoconservative2_4-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Paleoconservative2-4"><span>[</span>5<span>]</span></a></sup> Most conservatives prefer Republicans over Democrats, and most factions favor a strong foreign policy, a strong military, and strong support for Israel. The conservative movement of the 1950s attempted to bring together these divergent strands, stressing the need for unity to prevent the spread of "Godless Communism".<sup id="cite_ref-5" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-5"><span>[</span>6<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p><a href="/wiki/William_F._Buckley_Jr." title="William F. Buckley Jr." class="mw-redirect">William F. Buckley Jr.</a>, in the first issue of the prominent magazine <a href="/wiki/National_Review" title="National Review">National Review</a>, defined the beliefs of American conservatives this way, in 1955:<sup id="cite_ref-Buckley_6-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Buckley-6"><span>[</span>7<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<table class="cquote" style="margin:auto; border-collapse: collapse; border: none; background-color: transparent; width: auto;">
<tr>
<td width="20" valign="top" style="border:none; color:#B2B7F2;font-size:35px;font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-weight: bold; text-align: left; padding: 10px 10px;">“</td>
<td valign="top" style="border: none; padding: 4px 10px;">Among our convictions:
<p>It is the job of centralized government (in peacetime) to protect its citizens’ lives, liberty and property. All other activities of government tend to diminish freedom and hamper progress. The growth of government (the dominant social feature of this century) must be fought relentlessly. In this great social conflict of the era, we are, without reservations, on the libertarian side. The profound crisis of our era is, in essence, the conflict between the Social Engineers, who seek to adjust mankind to conform with scientific utopias, and the disciples of Truth, who defend the organic moral order. We believe that truth is neither arrived at nor illuminated by monitoring election results, binding though these are for other purposes, but by other means, including a study of human experience. On this point we are, without reservations, on the conservative side.</p>
</td>
<td width="20" valign="bottom" style="border: none; color: #B2B7F2; font-size: 35px; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-weight: bold; text-align: right; padding: 10px 10px;">”</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><br /></p>
<div class="thumb tleft">
<div class="thumbinner" style="width:140px;"><a href="/wiki/File:Russell_Kirk.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/47/Russell_Kirk.jpg" width="138" height="192" class="thumbimage" /></a>
<div class="thumbcaption">
<div class="magnify"><a href="/wiki/File:Russell_Kirk.jpg" class="internal" title="Enlarge"><img src="//bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.18/common/images/magnify-clip.png" width="15" height="11" alt="" /></a></div>
<a href="/wiki/Russell_Kirk" title="Russell Kirk">Russell Kirk</a>, conservative pundit</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>In the 1980s President <a href="/wiki/Ronald_Reagan" title="Ronald Reagan">Ronald Reagan</a> solidified conservative Republican strength with <a href="/wiki/Tax_cuts" title="Tax cuts" class="mw-redirect">tax cuts</a>, greatly increased <a href="/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_United_States" title="Military budget of the United States">defense spending</a>, <a href="/wiki/Deregulation" title="Deregulation">deregulation</a>, a policy of <a href="/wiki/Rollback" title="Rollback">rolling back Communism</a> (rather than just containing it), a greatly strengthened military, and appeals to <a href="/wiki/Family_values" title="Family values">family values</a> and conservative Christian morality. The Reagan model became the conservative standard for social, economic and foreign policy issues, and that period of American history became known as the "<a href="/wiki/Reagan_Era" title="Reagan Era">Reagan Era</a>".<sup id="cite_ref-7" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-7"><span>[</span>8<span>]</span></a></sup> After the fall of <a href="/wiki/Soviet_Union" title="Soviet Union">Soviet Communism</a> in 1991, key conservative domestic issues become what conservative columnist <a href="/wiki/William_Safire" title="William Safire">William Safire</a> calls "God, guns, and gays". Conservative voters tend to oppose abortion, gun control, and <a href="/wiki/Same-sex_marriage" title="Same-sex marriage">gay marriage</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-8" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-8"><span>[</span>9<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-9" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-9"><span>[</span>10<span>]</span></a></sup> From 2001 to 2008 Republican President <a href="/wiki/George_W._Bush" title="George W. Bush">George W. Bush</a> stressed cutting taxes, increasing spending, minimizing regulation of industry and banking,<sup id="cite_ref-10" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-10"><span>[</span>11<span>]</span></a></sup> and the use of American military power to fight terrorists, promote democracy, and secure American interests in the Middle East.<sup id="cite_ref-11" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-11"><span>[</span>12<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>Other modern conservative beliefs include <a href="/wiki/World_government" title="World government">opposition to a world government</a> (a view shared with many <a href="/wiki/Anti-globalists" title="Anti-globalists" class="mw-redirect">anti-globalists</a> on the <a href="/wiki/Political_left" title="Political left" class="mw-redirect">political left</a>), skepticism about the importance or validity of various environmental issues,<sup id="cite_ref-12" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-12"><span>[</span>13<span>]</span></a></sup> the importance of self-reliance instead of reliance on the government to solve problems, support for the state of Israel,<sup id="cite_ref-13" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-13"><span>[</span>14<span>]</span></a></sup> support for prayer in the public schools,<sup id="cite_ref-14" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-14"><span>[</span>15<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-15" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-15"><span>[</span>16<span>]</span></a></sup> opposition to gun control,<sup id="cite_ref-16" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-16"><span>[</span>17<span>]</span></a></sup> opposition to embryonic stem cell research, support for a strong <a href="/wiki/Law_and_order_(politics)" title="Law and order (politics)">Law and Order</a> policy, strict enforcement of the law, and long jail terms for repeat offenders.<sup id="cite_ref-17" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-17"><span>[</span>18<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>According to an August 1, 2011 poll, 11% of American voters identify themselves as "very conservative", 30% as "conservative", 36% as "moderate", 15% as "liberal", and 6% as "very liberal".<sup id="cite_ref-18" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-18"><span>[</span>19<span>]</span></a></sup> These percentages have been fairly constant since 1990.<sup id="cite_ref-19" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-19"><span>[</span>20<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>The meaning of "conservatism" in America has little in common with the way the word is used elsewhere. As Ribuffo (2011) notes, "what Americans now call conservatism much of the world calls liberalism or neoliberalism."<sup id="cite_ref-20" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-20"><span>[</span>21<span>]</span></a></sup> Since the 1950s conservatism in the United States has been chiefly associated with the <a href="/wiki/History_of_the_Republican_Party_(United_States)" title="History of the Republican Party (United States)" class="mw-redirect">Republican Party</a>. However, during the era of <a href="/wiki/Racial_segregation_in_the_United_States" title="Racial segregation in the United States">segregation</a> many <a href="/wiki/Southern_Democrats" title="Southern Democrats">Southern Democrats</a> were conservatives, and they played a key role in the <a href="/wiki/Conservative_Coalition" title="Conservative Coalition" class="mw-redirect">Conservative Coalition</a> that controlled Congress from 1937 to 1963.</p>
<table id="toc" class="toc">
<tr>
<td>
<div id="toctitle">
<h2>Contents</h2>
</div>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-1"><a href="#History"><span class="tocnumber">1</span> <span class="toctext">History</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-2"><a href="#American_Revolution"><span class="tocnumber">1.1</span> <span class="toctext">American Revolution</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-3"><a href="#Federalists"><span class="tocnumber">1.2</span> <span class="toctext">Federalists</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-4"><a href="#Lincoln_and_the_Civil_War"><span class="tocnumber">1.3</span> <span class="toctext">Lincoln and the Civil War</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-5"><a href="#Southern_conservatism"><span class="tocnumber">1.4</span> <span class="toctext">Southern conservatism</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-6"><a href="#The_Gilded_Age"><span class="tocnumber">1.5</span> <span class="toctext">The Gilded Age</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-7"><a href="#Empire"><span class="tocnumber">1.6</span> <span class="toctext">Empire</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-8"><a href="#Progressive_Era"><span class="tocnumber">1.7</span> <span class="toctext">Progressive Era</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-9"><a href="#World_War_I"><span class="tocnumber">1.8</span> <span class="toctext">World War I</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-10"><a href="#1920s"><span class="tocnumber">1.9</span> <span class="toctext">1920s</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-11"><a href="#Anti-Communism"><span class="tocnumber">1.10</span> <span class="toctext">Anti-Communism</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-12"><a href="#Writers_and_intellectuals"><span class="tocnumber">1.11</span> <span class="toctext">Writers and intellectuals</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-13"><a href="#Newspapers"><span class="tocnumber">1.12</span> <span class="toctext">Newspapers</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-14"><a href="#Great_Depression"><span class="tocnumber">1.13</span> <span class="toctext">Great Depression</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-3 tocsection-15"><a href="#Jefferson.27s_image"><span class="tocnumber">1.13.1</span> <span class="toctext">Jefferson's image</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-16"><a href="#1945.E2.80.931951"><span class="tocnumber">2</span> <span class="toctext">1945–1951</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-17"><a href="#Korean_War"><span class="tocnumber">2.1</span> <span class="toctext">Korean War</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-18"><a href="#McCarthyism:_1950.E2.80.9354"><span class="tocnumber">2.2</span> <span class="toctext">McCarthyism: 1950–54</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-19"><a href="#1950s"><span class="tocnumber">3</span> <span class="toctext">1950s</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-20"><a href="#Eisenhower"><span class="tocnumber">3.1</span> <span class="toctext">Eisenhower</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-21"><a href="#Russell_Kirk"><span class="tocnumber">3.2</span> <span class="toctext">Russell Kirk</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-22"><a href="#William_F._Buckley_and_the_National_Review"><span class="tocnumber">3.3</span> <span class="toctext">William F. Buckley and the National Review</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-23"><a href="#Milton_Friedman_and_Libertarian_economics"><span class="tocnumber">3.4</span> <span class="toctext">Milton Friedman and Libertarian economics</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-24"><a href="#John_Birch_Society"><span class="tocnumber">3.5</span> <span class="toctext">John Birch Society</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-25"><a href="#Internal_disagreements"><span class="tocnumber">3.6</span> <span class="toctext">Internal disagreements</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-26"><a href="#1960s"><span class="tocnumber">4</span> <span class="toctext">1960s</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-27"><a href="#Wallace_in_1963"><span class="tocnumber">4.1</span> <span class="toctext">Wallace in 1963</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-28"><a href="#Goldwater_in_1964"><span class="tocnumber">4.2</span> <span class="toctext">Goldwater in 1964</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-29"><a href="#1970s"><span class="tocnumber">5</span> <span class="toctext">1970s</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-30"><a href="#Religious_Right"><span class="tocnumber">5.1</span> <span class="toctext">Religious Right</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-31"><a href="#Neoconservatives"><span class="tocnumber">5.2</span> <span class="toctext">Neoconservatives</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-32"><a href="#Conservatism_in_the_South"><span class="tocnumber">5.3</span> <span class="toctext">Conservatism in the South</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-33"><a href="#Think_tanks_and_foundations"><span class="tocnumber">5.4</span> <span class="toctext">Think tanks and foundations</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-34"><a href="#Nixon.2C_Ford.2C_Carter"><span class="tocnumber">5.5</span> <span class="toctext">Nixon, Ford, Carter</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-35"><a href="#1970s_recessions"><span class="tocnumber">5.6</span> <span class="toctext">1970s recessions</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-36"><a href="#Stopping_the_Equal_Rights_Amendment"><span class="tocnumber">5.7</span> <span class="toctext">Stopping the Equal Rights Amendment</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-37"><a href="#1980s:_Reagan_Era"><span class="tocnumber">6</span> <span class="toctext">1980s: Reagan Era</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-38"><a href="#Conservative_ascent"><span class="tocnumber">6.1</span> <span class="toctext">Conservative ascent</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-39"><a href="#Since_1990"><span class="tocnumber">7</span> <span class="toctext">Since 1990</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-40"><a href="#George_W._Bush"><span class="tocnumber">7.1</span> <span class="toctext">George W. Bush</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-41"><a href="#2008_election"><span class="tocnumber">7.2</span> <span class="toctext">2008 election</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-42"><a href="#Tea_Party"><span class="tocnumber">7.3</span> <span class="toctext">Tea Party</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-43"><a href="#Types"><span class="tocnumber">8</span> <span class="toctext">Types</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-44"><a href="#Ideology_and_political_philosophy"><span class="tocnumber">8.1</span> <span class="toctext">Ideology and political philosophy</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-45"><a href="#Social_conservatism_and_tradition"><span class="tocnumber">8.2</span> <span class="toctext">Social conservatism and tradition</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-46"><a href="#Fiscal_conservatism"><span class="tocnumber">8.3</span> <span class="toctext">Fiscal conservatism</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-47"><a href="#Electoral_politics"><span class="tocnumber">9</span> <span class="toctext">Electoral politics</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-48"><a href="#Geography"><span class="tocnumber">9.1</span> <span class="toctext">Geography</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-49"><a href="#Other_topics"><span class="tocnumber">10</span> <span class="toctext">Other topics</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-50"><a href="#Kirk.27s_six_canons_of_conservatism"><span class="tocnumber">10.1</span> <span class="toctext">Kirk's six canons of conservatism</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-51"><a href="#Courts"><span class="tocnumber">10.2</span> <span class="toctext">Courts</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-3 tocsection-52"><a href="#Originalism"><span class="tocnumber">10.2.1</span> <span class="toctext">Originalism</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-53"><a href="#Environmentalism"><span class="tocnumber">10.3</span> <span class="toctext">Environmentalism</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-54"><a href="#Semantics.2C_language.2C_and_media"><span class="tocnumber">10.4</span> <span class="toctext">Semantics, language, and media</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-3 tocsection-55"><a href="#Vocabulary"><span class="tocnumber">10.4.1</span> <span class="toctext">Vocabulary</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-4 tocsection-56"><a href="#Democrat_Party"><span class="tocnumber">10.4.1.1</span> <span class="toctext">Democrat Party</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-4 tocsection-57"><a href="#Socialism"><span class="tocnumber">10.4.1.2</span> <span class="toctext">Socialism</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="toclevel-3 tocsection-58"><a href="#Broadcast_media"><span class="tocnumber">10.4.2</span> <span class="toctext">Broadcast media</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-59"><a href="#Academic_analysis"><span class="tocnumber">10.5</span> <span class="toctext">Academic analysis</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-60"><a href="#Thinkers_and_leaders"><span class="tocnumber">11</span> <span class="toctext">Thinkers and leaders</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-61"><a href="#Major_American_conservatives"><span class="tocnumber">11.1</span> <span class="toctext">Major American conservatives</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-3 tocsection-62"><a href="#Rossiter.27s_giants"><span class="tocnumber">11.1.1</span> <span class="toctext">Rossiter's giants</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-3 tocsection-63"><a href="#Prominent_figures"><span class="tocnumber">11.1.2</span> <span class="toctext">Prominent figures</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-64"><a href="#See_also"><span class="tocnumber">12</span> <span class="toctext">See also</span></a>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-65"><a href="#Organizations_and_publications"><span class="tocnumber">12.1</span> <span class="toctext">Organizations and publications</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-66"><a href="#Media"><span class="tocnumber">12.2</span> <span class="toctext">Media</span></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-67"><a href="#References"><span class="tocnumber">13</span> <span class="toctext">References</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-68"><a href="#Further_reading"><span class="tocnumber">14</span> <span class="toctext">Further reading</span></a></li>
<li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-69"><a href="#External_links"><span class="tocnumber">15</span> <span class="toctext">External links</span></a></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=1" title="Edit section: History">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="History">History</span></h2>
<p>The United States has never had a national political party called the Conservative Party. All major American political parties support the <a href="/wiki/Republicanism_in_the_United_States" title="Republicanism in the United States">republican</a> and liberal ideals on which the country was founded in 1776, with an emphasis on liberty, pursuit of happiness, rule of law, opposition to aristocracy, and emphasis on equal rights. Political divisions inside the United States have seemed minor or trivial to Europeans, where the divide between the Left and the Right led to very high polarization, starting with the <a href="/wiki/French_Revolution" title="French Revolution">French Revolution</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-21" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-21"><span>[</span>22<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>However American historian <a href="/wiki/Patrick_Allitt" title="Patrick Allitt">Patrick Allitt</a>,<sup id="cite_ref-22" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-22"><span>[</span>23<span>]</span></a></sup> finds "Certain continuities can be traced through American history. The conservative 'attitude' ... was one of trusting to the past, to long-established patterns of thought and conduct, and of assuming that novelties were more likely to be dangerous than advantageous."</p>
<p>Since 1776 there have been no American spokesmen for the European ideals of "conservatism" such as an established church and a hereditary aristocracy. Rather, American conservatism is a reaction against utopian ideas of progress.<sup id="cite_ref-23" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-23"><span>[</span>24<span>]</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Russell_Kirk" title="Russell Kirk">Russell Kirk</a> saw the American Revolution itself as "a conservative reaction, in the English political tradition, against royal innovation".<sup id="cite_ref-Russell_Kirk_1953_p._6.2C_63_24-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Russell_Kirk_1953_p._6.2C_63-24"><span>[</span>25<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<div class="thumb tright">
<div class="thumbinner" style="width:152px;"><a href="/wiki/File:Daniel_Webster_-_circa_1847.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2b/Daniel_Webster_-_circa_1847.jpg/150px-Daniel_Webster_-_circa_1847.jpg" width="150" height="188" class="thumbimage" /></a>
<div class="thumbcaption">
<div class="magnify"><a href="/wiki/File:Daniel_Webster_-_circa_1847.jpg" class="internal" title="Enlarge"><img src="//bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.18/common/images/magnify-clip.png" width="15" height="11" alt="" /></a></div>
Daniel Webster</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>In the 1790s <a href="/wiki/Jeffersonian_Democracy" title="Jeffersonian Democracy" class="mw-redirect">Jeffersonian Democracy</a> arose in opposition to the elitism of the <a href="/wiki/Federalist_Party" title="Federalist Party">Federalist Party</a>, and fears that it intended to impose a monarchical system like Britain's. <a href="/wiki/Jeffersonians" title="Jeffersonians" class="mw-redirect">Jeffersonians</a> opposed a strong federal government and an interventionist judiciary—themes later picked up by conservatives.<sup id="cite_ref-25" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-25"><span>[</span>26<span>]</span></a></sup> By the 1830s, conservatism came to be identified with the <a href="/wiki/Whig_Party_(United_States)" title="Whig Party (United States)">Whig Party</a>, which supported banks, business and modernization of the economy, while opposing the <a href="/wiki/Jacksonian_democracy" title="Jacksonian democracy">Jacksonian democracy</a> which represented poor farmers and the urban working class. They chose the name "Whig" because it had been used by patriots in the Revolution. <a href="/wiki/Daniel_Webster" title="Daniel Webster">Daniel Webster</a> and other Whig leaders referred to their new political party as the "conservative party", and they called for a return to tradition, restraint, hierarchy, and moderation.<sup id="cite_ref-26" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-26"><span>[</span>27<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>During the American Civil War the South fought for the right to expand slavery while the North fought to preserve the Union. After the war, "conservative" meant opposition to the <a href="/wiki/Radical_Republicans" title="Radical Republicans">Radical Republicans</a>, who wanted to grant full citizenship rights to freed slaves.<sup id="cite_ref-27" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-27"><span>[</span>28<span>]</span></a></sup> During the Reconstruction Era, conservative meant opposition to the <a href="/wiki/Radical_Republicans" title="Radical Republicans">Radical Republicans</a>, who wanted to grant freed slaves political power and take it away from the ex-Confederates.<sup id="cite_ref-28" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-28"><span>[</span>29<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=2" title="Edit section: American Revolution">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="American_Revolution">American Revolution</span></h3>
<p>American conservatives today strongly admire the Founding Fathers, and demand a return to their values. Historians have given considerable attention to the values of the Founding Fathers, and to conservatism in America at the time of the Revolution. By the 1750s and 1760s some colonial institutions had conservative aspects. These included political power held by small elites, established churches in half the colonies,<sup id="cite_ref-29" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-29"><span>[</span>30<span>]</span></a></sup> entailed property rights in Virginia, large landholdings operated by riotous tenants in New York, and slavery in every colony. Although the colonists lived under the freest government in the European world,<sup id="cite_ref-30" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-30"><span>[</span>31<span>]</span></a></sup> they were fiercely determined to protect and preserve their historic rights. By the 1750s most Americans owned property and could vote in elections that controlled local government. Local and colonial taxes were low, and imperial taxes were few.<sup id="cite_ref-31" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-31"><span>[</span>32<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-32" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-32"><span>[</span>33<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-33" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-33"><span>[</span>34<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-34" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-34"><span>[</span>35<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>By the 1770s there was a large element tied to the <a href="/wiki/British_Empire" title="British Empire">British Empire</a>, including wealthy merchants involved in international trade, and royal officials and patronage holders. Most of these conservative elites and their followers who remained loyal to the Crown are called <a href="/wiki/Loyalist_(American_Revolution)" title="Loyalist (American Revolution)">Loyalists</a> or "Tories". The Loyalists were "conservatives" in that they tried to preserve the status quo of Empire against revolutionary change. Their leaders were men of wealth and property who loved order, respected their betters, looked down on their inferiors, and feared democratic rule by the rabble at home more than rule by a distant aristocracy. When it came to a choice between protecting their historic rights as Americans or remaining loyal to the King, they chose King and Empire.<sup id="cite_ref-35" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-35"><span>[</span>36<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-36" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-36"><span>[</span>37<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>The patriots who fought the Revolution did so in the name of preserving traditional rights of Englishmen—especially the right of "<a href="/wiki/No_taxation_without_representation" title="No taxation without representation">no taxation without representation</a>"; they increasingly opposed attempts by Parliament to tax and control the fast-growing colonies. When the British cracked down hard on Boston after the <a href="/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party" title="Boston Tea Party">Boston Tea Party</a> in 1773, the patriots organized colony-by-colony and were ready to fight.<sup id="cite_ref-37" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-37"><span>[</span>38<span>]</span></a></sup> Fighting broke out in spring 1775, and all Thirteen Colonies rallied to expel royal officials. The colonies formed a Congress that became the de facto national government, raised an army under <a href="/wiki/George_Washington" title="George Washington">George Washington</a>, won support from France, and declared independence as the "United States of America" in July 1776. The patriots formed a consensus around the ideas of <a href="/wiki/Republicanism_in_the_United_States" title="Republicanism in the United States">republicanism</a>, whereby the people were sovereign (not the king), every citizen had equal legal rights, elected assemblies made the laws, inherited titles, established armies and churches were rejected, and corruption of the sort practiced by royalty was repudiated.</p>
<p>Labaree (1948) has identified eight characteristics of the Loyalists that made them essentially conservative in opposing Independence. Psychologically they were older, better established, and resisted innovation. They thought resistance to the Crown—the legitimate government—was morally wrong. They were alienated when the Patriots' resorted to violence, such as burning houses and tarring and feathering. They wanted to take a middle-of-the road position and were angry when forced by the Patriots to declare their opposition. They had a long-standing sentimental attachment to Britain (often with business and family links). They were procrastinators who realized that independence was bound to come some day, but wanted to postpone the moment. They were cautious and afraid of anarchy or tyranny that might come from mob rule. Finally they were pessimists who lacked the confidence in the future displayed by the Patriots.<sup id="cite_ref-38" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-38"><span>[</span>39<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-39" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-39"><span>[</span>40<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-40" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-40"><span>[</span>41<span>]</span></a></sup> Loyalists willing to accept republican principles remained after the war—80% stayed on—while those who rejected republicanism went elsewhere in the British Empire (mostly to Canada), taking their conservatism with them. The new principles of the Revolution became the core American political values agreed to by all sides, and became part of the core principles of what is now called American conservatism.</p>
<p>Thus the American Revolution disrupted the old networks of conservative elites. The departure of so many royal officials, rich merchants and landed gentry destroyed the hierarchical networks that had dominated most of the colonies. In New York, for example, the departure of key members of the DeLancy, DePester Walton, and Cruger families undercut the interlocking families that largely owned and controlled the Hudson Valley. Likewise in Pennsylvania, the departure of powerful families—Penn, Allen, Chew, Shippen—destroyed the cohesion of the old upper class there. New men became rich merchants but they shared a spirit of republican equality that replaced the elitism and the Americans never recreated such a powerful upper class. One rich patriot in Boston noted in 1779 that "fellows who would have cleaned my shoes five years ago, have amassed fortunes and are riding in chariots."<sup id="cite_ref-41" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-41"><span>[</span>42<span>]</span></a></sup> Nevertheless the conservatism of the Loyalists did not die out. Eight in ten remained in America after the Revolution. For the most part, they avoided politics; certainly they never tried to form a revanchist movement seeking a return to the Empire. <a href="/wiki/Samuel_Seabury_(1729%E2%80%931796)" title="Samuel Seabury (1729–1796)" class="mw-redirect">Samuel Seabury</a> remained and abandoned politics but became the first <a href="/wiki/Episcopal_Church_(United_States)" title="Episcopal Church (United States)">Episcopalian bishop</a> in the United States, rebuilding a church that appealed to the upper class that still admired hierarchy, tradition, and historic liturgy.<sup id="cite_ref-42" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-42"><span>[</span>43<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=3" title="Edit section: Federalists">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Federalists">Federalists</span></h3>
<p>The <a href="/wiki/Federalist_Party" title="Federalist Party">Federalist Party</a>, dominated by Treasury Secretary <a href="/wiki/Alexander_Hamilton" title="Alexander Hamilton">Alexander Hamilton</a> used the presidency of <a href="/wiki/George_Washington" title="George Washington">George Washington</a> to promote a strong nation capable of holding its own in world affairs, with a strong army and navy, capable of suppressing internal revolts (such as the <a href="/wiki/Whiskey_Rebellion" title="Whiskey Rebellion">Whiskey Rebellion</a>) and founding the national finances on a sound basis while winning the broad support of the financial and business community.<sup id="cite_ref-43" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-43"><span>[</span>44<span>]</span></a></sup> Intellectually, Federalists, while devoted to <a href="/wiki/Republicanism_in_the_United_States" title="Republicanism in the United States">liberty</a> held profoundly conservative views atuned to the American character. As <a href="/wiki/Samuel_Eliot_Morison" title="Samuel Eliot Morison">Samuel Eliot Morison</a> explained, They believed that liberty is inseparable from union, that men are essentially unequal, that vox populi [voice of the people] is seldom if ever vox Dei [the voice of God], and that sinister outside influences are busy undermining American integrity.<sup id="cite_ref-44" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-44"><span>[</span>45<span>]</span></a></sup> Historian <a href="/wiki/Patrick_Allitt" title="Patrick Allitt">Patrick Allitt</a> concludes that Federalists promoted many conservative positions, including the rule of law under the Constitution, republican government, peaceful change through elections, judicial supremacy, stable national finances, credible and active diplomacy, and protection of wealth.<sup id="cite_ref-45" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-45"><span>[</span>46<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>The Federalists were dominated by businessmen and merchants in the major cities and was supportive of the modernizing, urbanizing, financial policies of Hamilton. These policies included the funding of the national debt and also assumption of state debts incurred during the Revolutionary War (thus allowing the states to lower their own taxes and still pay their debts), the incorporation of a national <a href="/wiki/First_Bank_of_the_United_States" title="First Bank of the United States">Bank of the United States</a>, the support of manufactures and industrial development, and the use of a tariff to fund the Treasury. In foreign affairs the Federalists opposed the <a href="/wiki/French_Revolution" title="French Revolution">French Revolution</a>. Under <a href="/wiki/John_Adams" title="John Adams">John Adams</a> they fought the "<a href="/wiki/Quasi_War" title="Quasi War" class="mw-redirect">Quasi War</a>" (an undeclared naval war) with France in 1798–99 and built a strong army and navy. Ideologically the controversy between <a href="/wiki/Democratic_Republican_Party" title="Democratic Republican Party" class="mw-redirect">Jeffersonian Republicans</a> and Federalists stemmed from a difference of principle and style. In terms of style the Federalists distrusted the public, thought the elite should be in charge, and favored national power over state power. Republicans distrusted Britain, bankers, merchants and did not want a powerful national government. The Federalists, notably Hamilton, were distrustful of "the people," the French, and the Republicans.<sup id="cite_ref-46" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-46"><span>[</span>47<span>]</span></a></sup> In the end, the nation synthesized the two positions, adopting representative democracy and a strong nation state. Just as importantly, American politics by the 1820s accepted the two-party system whereby rival parties stake their claims before the electorate, and the winner takes control of the government. As time went on, the Federalists lost appeal with the average voter and were generally not equal to the tasks of party organization; hence, they grew steadily weaker as the political triumphs of the Republican Party grew after 1800. After 1816 the Federalists had no national influence apart from <a href="/wiki/John_Marshall" title="John Marshall">John Marshall</a>'s Supreme Court. They retained some local support into the 1820s, but important leaders left their fading cause, including future presidents <a href="/wiki/John_Quincy_Adams" title="John Quincy Adams">John Quincy Adams</a> and <a href="/wiki/James_Buchanan" title="James Buchanan">James Buchanan</a>, and future Chief Justice <a href="/wiki/Roger_B._Taney" title="Roger B. Taney">Roger B. Taney</a>.</p>
<p>The "Old Republicans," led by <a href="/wiki/John_Randolph_of_Roanoke" title="John Randolph of Roanoke">John Randolph of Roanoke</a>, refused to form a coalition with the Federalists and instead set up a separate opposition since the main Republican leaders (notably <a href="/wiki/James_Madison" title="James Madison">James Madison</a>, <a href="/wiki/Albert_Gallatin" title="Albert Gallatin">Albert Gallatin</a>, <a href="/wiki/James_Monroe" title="James Monroe">James Monroe</a>, <a href="/wiki/John_C._Calhoun" title="John C. Calhoun">John C. Calhoun</a><sup id="cite_ref-47" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-47"><span>[</span>48<span>]</span></a></sup> and <a href="/wiki/Henry_Clay" title="Henry Clay">Henry Clay</a>) had in effect adopted Federalist principles by chartering the Second national bank, promoting <a href="/wiki/Internal_improvements" title="Internal improvements">internal improvements</a> for transportation, raising tariffs to protect factories, and promoting a strong army and navy after the failures of the War of 1812.<sup id="cite_ref-48" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-48"><span>[</span>49<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=4" title="Edit section: Lincoln and the Civil War">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Lincoln_and_the_Civil_War">Lincoln and the Civil War</span></h3>
<p>Before the outbreak of the war, <a href="/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln" title="Abraham Lincoln">Abraham Lincoln</a> tried to appeal to conservatives. In a speech in Ohio in 1859, he explained what he meant by conservatism in terms of fealty to the original intent of the Founding Fathers:</p>
<dl>
<dd>"<i>The chief and real purpose of the Republican party is eminently conservative. It proposes nothing save and except to restore this government to its original tone in regard to this element of slavery, and there to maintain it, looking for no further change in reference to it than that which the original framers of the Government themselves expected and looked forward to."</i><sup id="cite_ref-49" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-49"><span>[</span>50<span>]</span></a></sup></dd>
</dl>
<p>Lincoln elaborated his position in his famous <a href="/wiki/Cooper_Union_speech" title="Cooper Union speech">Cooper Union speech</a> in early 1860, arguing that the Founding Fathers expected slavery to die a natural death, not to spread. His point was that the Founding Fathers were anti-slavery and the notion that slavery was good was a radical innovation that violated American ideals. This speech solidified Lincoln's base in the Republican party and helped assure his nomination.<sup id="cite_ref-50" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-50"><span>[</span>51<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>During the war, Lincoln fought the <a href="/wiki/Radical_Republicans" title="Radical Republicans">Radical Republicans</a> on the issue of dealing with slavery and re-integrating the South in to the nation. He built his own coalition of conservative and moderate Republicans, and War Democrats.<sup id="cite_ref-51" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-51"><span>[</span>52<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-52" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-52"><span>[</span>53<span>]</span></a></sup> After the war, Lincoln tried to reintegrate the white South into the union as soon as possible by offering generous peace terms, "with malice toward none, with charity toward all". When Lincoln was assassinated, the Radicals gained the upper hand and imposed much harsher terms than those Lincoln had wished.<sup id="cite_ref-53" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-53"><span>[</span>54<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>Throughout his career, Lincoln was a champion of the conservative Whig party and fought the liberal <a href="/wiki/Jacksonian_Democracy" title="Jacksonian Democracy" class="mw-redirect">Jacksonian Democracy</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-54" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-54"><span>[</span>55<span>]</span></a></sup> He promoted business interests, especially banks, railroads and factories. The question of whether Lincoln was a liberal or conservative has been debated. Norman Graeber has argued in favor of Lincoln having conservative positions<sup id="cite_ref-55" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-55"><span>[</span>56<span>]</span></a></sup> while James Randall has argued in favor of Lincoln having 19th century liberal positions while at the same time emphasized Lincoln's tolerance and moderation "in his preference for orderly progress, his distrust of dangerous agitation, and his reluctance toward ill digested schemes of reform." Randall concluded that Lincoln was "conservative in his complete avoidance of that type of so-called 'radicalism' which involved abuse of the South, hatred for the slaveholder, thirst for vengeance, partisan plotting, and ungenerous demands that Southern institutions be transformed overnight by outsiders."<sup id="cite_ref-56" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-56"><span>[</span>57<span>]</span></a></sup> David Greenstone argues that Lincoln's thought was grounded in reform liberalism but notes his unionism and Whiggish politics had a deeply conservative side as well.<sup id="cite_ref-57" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-57"><span>[</span>58<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=5" title="Edit section: Southern conservatism">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Southern_conservatism">Southern conservatism</span></h3>
<div class="rellink relarticle mainarticle">Main articles: <a href="/wiki/Solid_South" title="Solid South">Solid South</a> and <a href="/wiki/Southern_Democrats" title="Southern Democrats">Southern Democrats</a></div>
<p>White Southerners thought that the radical experiments by Northern reformers to educate the freed slaves violated the rights of white men and they often accused anyone who tried to help freed slaves of corruption. The race-based conservatism in the American South differed from the business-based conservatism in the North in its strong support for white supremacy, and insistence on a second-class powerless status for blacks, regardless of the Constitution.<sup id="cite_ref-58" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-58"><span>[</span>59<span>]</span></a></sup> Southern conservatives later added anti-communism to their agenda, believing that the ideology was behind the civil rights movement and the push for integration.<sup id="cite_ref-59" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-59"><span>[</span>60<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>There was also a liberal element in the South—in support of Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt—but they rarely opposed Jim Crow.<sup id="cite_ref-60" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-60"><span>[</span>61<span>]</span></a></sup> From 1877 to 1960, the "<a href="/wiki/Solid_South" title="Solid South">Solid South</a>" voted for Democrats in almost all national elections; Democrats had firm control of state and local government in all southern states. By the late 1930s conservative Southern Democrats in Congress joined with most Northern Republicans in an informal <a href="/wiki/Conservative_Coalition" title="Conservative Coalition" class="mw-redirect">Conservative Coalition</a> that usually proved decisive in stopping liberal domestic legislation until 1964. However the Southerners generally were much more internationalist than the mostly isolationist Republicans in the Coalition.<sup id="cite_ref-61" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-61"><span>[</span>62<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p><a href="/wiki/Fundamentalism" title="Fundamentalism">Fundamentalism</a>, especially on the part of <a href="/wiki/Southern_Baptist_Convention" title="Southern Baptist Convention">Southern Baptists</a>, was a powerful force in Southern conservative politics beginning in the late 1970s. They voted for Reagan in 1980 over a fellow Southern Baptist Jimmy Carter.<sup id="cite_ref-Merle_Black_2003_62-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Merle_Black_2003-62"><span>[</span>63<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-63" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-63"><span>[</span>64<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=6" title="Edit section: The Gilded Age">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="The_Gilded_Age">The Gilded Age</span></h3>
<div class="rellink relarticle mainarticle">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Gilded_Age" title="Gilded Age">Gilded Age</a></div>
<p>There was little nostalgia and backward looking in the dynamic North and West during the "Gilded Age"—the boom decades that followed the Civil War. Business was expanding rapidly, with manufacturing, mining, railroads, and banking leading the way. There were millions of new farms in the prairie states. Immigration reached record levels. Progress was the watchword of the day. The wealth of the period is highlighted by <a href="/wiki/American_upper_class" title="American upper class">American upper class</a> opulence, but also by the rise of American <a href="/wiki/Philanthropy" title="Philanthropy">philanthropy</a> (referred to by Andrew Carnegie as the "Gospel of Wealth") that used private money to endow thousands of colleges, hospitals, museums, academies, schools, opera houses, public libraries, symphony orchestras, and charities.<sup id="cite_ref-64" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-64"><span>[</span>65<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>Conservatives in the 20th Century, looking back at the Gilded Age, retroactively applied the word "conservative" to those who supported unrestrained capitalism. For example, <a href="/wiki/Oswald_Garrison_Villard" title="Oswald Garrison Villard">Oswald Garrison Villard</a>, writing in 1939, characterized his former mentor <a href="/wiki/Horace_White_(writer)" title="Horace White (writer)">Horace White</a> (1834–1916) as "a great economic conservative; had he lived to see the days of the New Deal financing he would probably have cried out loud and promptly demised."<sup id="cite_ref-65" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-65"><span>[</span>66<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>In this sense, the conservative element of the Democratic party was led by the <a href="/wiki/Bourbon_Democrats" title="Bourbon Democrats" class="mw-redirect">Bourbon Democrats</a> and their hero President <a href="/wiki/Grover_Cleveland" title="Grover Cleveland">Grover Cleveland</a>, who fought against high tariffs and on behalf of the <a href="/wiki/Gold_standard" title="Gold standard">gold standard</a>. In 1896, the Bourbons were overthrown inside the Democratic Party by <a href="/wiki/William_Jennings_Bryan" title="William Jennings Bryan">William Jennings Bryan</a> and the agrarians, who preached "<a href="/wiki/Free_Silver" title="Free Silver">Free Silver</a>" and opposition to the power that banks and railroads had over the American farmer. The agrarians formed a coalition with the <a href="/wiki/People%27s_Party_(United_States)" title="People's Party (United States)">Populists</a> and vehemently denounced the politics of big business, especially in <a href="/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1896" title="United States presidential election, 1896">the decisive 1896 election</a>, won by Republican <a href="/wiki/William_McKinley" title="William McKinley">William McKinley</a>, who was easily reelected over Bryan in 1900 as well.</p>
<p>Religious conservatives of this period sponsored a large and flourishing media network, especially based on magazines, many with close ties to the Protestant churches that were rapidly expanding due to the <a href="/wiki/Third_Great_Awakening" title="Third Great Awakening">Third Great Awakening</a>. Catholics had few magazines but opposed agrarianism in politics and established hundreds of schools and colleges to promote their conservative religious and social values.<sup id="cite_ref-66" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-66"><span>[</span>67<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>Modern conservatives often point to <a href="/wiki/William_Graham_Sumner" title="William Graham Sumner">William Graham Sumner</a> (1840–1910), a leading public intellectual of the era, as one of their own, citing his articulate support for free markets, anti-imperialism, and the gold standard, and his opposition to what he saw as threats to the middle class from the rich plutocrats above or the agrarians and ignorant masses below.<sup id="cite_ref-67" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-67"><span>[</span>68<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-68" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-68"><span>[</span>69<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>The Gilded Age came to an end with the <a href="/wiki/Panic_of_1893" title="Panic of 1893">Panic of 1893</a> and the severe nationwide depression that lasted from 1893 to 1897.</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=7" title="Edit section: Empire">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Empire">Empire</span></h3>
<p>As the 19th century drew to a close the United States became a major world power, having acquired overseas territories in Hawaii, Cuba, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico. The two parties re-aligned in the election of 1896, with the Republicans, led by <a href="/wiki/William_McKinley" title="William McKinley">William McKinley</a>, becoming the party of business, <a href="/wiki/Sound_money" title="Sound money" class="mw-redirect">sound money</a>, and assertive foreign policy, while the Democrats, led by William Jennings Bryan, became the party of the worker, the small farmer, "Free Silver", and anti-imperialism. Bryan was also popular with religious fundamentalists and white supremacists.<sup id="cite_ref-69" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-69"><span>[</span>70<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>Imperialism won out, as the election of 1900 ratified McKinley's policies and the U.S. possession of Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Philippines and (temporarily) Cuba. <a href="/wiki/Theodore_Roosevelt" title="Theodore Roosevelt">Theodore Roosevelt</a> promoted the military and naval advantages of the U.S., and echoed McKinley's theme that America had a duty to civilize and modernize the heathen.<sup id="cite_ref-70" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-70"><span>[</span>71<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-71" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-71"><span>[</span>72<span>]</span></a></sup> The supposed business, religious, and military advantages of having an empire proved illusory; by 1908 or so the most ardent imperialists, including <a href="/wiki/Theodore_Roosevelt" title="Theodore Roosevelt">Theodore Roosevelt</a>, <a href="/wiki/William_Howard_Taft" title="William Howard Taft">William Howard Taft</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Elihu_Root" title="Elihu Root">Elihu Root</a><sup id="cite_ref-72" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-72"><span>[</span>73<span>]</span></a></sup> turned their attention to building up an army and navy at home and to building the <a href="/wiki/Panama_Canal" title="Panama Canal">Panama Canal</a>. They dropped the notion of additional expansion and agreed by 1920 that the Philippines should become independent.<sup id="cite_ref-73" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-73"><span>[</span>74<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-74" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-74"><span>[</span>75<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=8" title="Edit section: Progressive Era">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Progressive_Era">Progressive Era</span></h3>
<p>In the early years of the 20th century, Republican spokesmen for big business in Congress included Speaker of the House <a href="/wiki/Joseph_Gurney_Cannon" title="Joseph Gurney Cannon">Joe Cannon</a> and Senate Republican Leader <a href="/wiki/Nelson_Aldrich" title="Nelson Aldrich" class="mw-redirect">Nelson Aldrich</a> of Rhode Island. Aldrich introduced the <a href="/wiki/Sixteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution" title="Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution">Sixteenth Amendment</a>, which allowed the federal government to collect an income tax; he also set in motion the design of the <a href="/wiki/Federal_Reserve_System" title="Federal Reserve System">Federal Reserve System</a>, which began in 1913.<sup id="cite_ref-75" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-75"><span>[</span>76<span>]</span></a></sup> Pro-business conservatives supported many <a href="/wiki/Progressive_Era" title="Progressive Era">Progressive Era</a> reforms, especially those opposed to corruption and inefficiency in government, and called for purification of politics. Conservative Senator <a href="/wiki/John_Sherman_(politician)" title="John Sherman (politician)" class="mw-redirect">John Sherman</a> sponsored the nation's basic anti-trust law in 1890, and conservatives generally supported anti-trust in the name of opposing monopoly and opening up opportunities for small business.<sup id="cite_ref-76" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-76"><span>[</span>77<span>]</span></a></sup> The issues of prohibition and woman suffrage split the conservatives.</p>
<p>The "insurgents" were on the Left of the Republican Party. Led by <a href="/wiki/Robert_M._La_Follette,_Sr." title="Robert M. La Follette, Sr.">Robert LaFollette</a> of Wisconsin, <a href="/wiki/George_W._Norris" title="George W. Norris">George W. Norris</a> of Nebraska, and <a href="/wiki/Hiram_Johnson" title="Hiram Johnson">Hiram Johnson</a> of California, they fought the conservatives in a series of bitter battles that split the GOP and allowed the Democrats to take control of Congress in 1910. Teddy Roosevelt, a hawk on foreign and military policy, moved increasingly to the Left on domestic issues regarding courts, unions, railroads, big business, labor unions and the welfare state.<sup id="cite_ref-77" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-77"><span>[</span>78<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-78" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-78"><span>[</span>79<span>]</span></a></sup> By 1910–11, Roosevelt had broken bitterly with Taft and the conservative wing of the GOP. In 1911–12 he took control of the insurgency, formed a third party, and ran an unsuccessful campaign for president on the <a href="/wiki/Progressive_Party_(United_States,_1912)" title="Progressive Party (United States, 1912)">Progressive Party ticket</a> in 1912. His departure left the conservatives, led by President <a href="/wiki/William_Howard_Taft" title="William Howard Taft">William Howard Taft</a>, dominant in the Republican party until 1936.<sup id="cite_ref-79" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-79"><span>[</span>80<span>]</span></a></sup> The split opened the way <a href="/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1912" title="United States presidential election, 1912">in 1912</a> for Democrat <a href="/wiki/Woodrow_Wilson" title="Woodrow Wilson">Woodrow Wilson</a> to become president with only 42% of the vote.</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=9" title="Edit section: World War I">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="World_War_I">World War I</span></h3>
<p>The <a href="/wiki/World_War_I" title="World War I">Great War</a> broke out in 1914, with Wilson proclaiming neutrality. Former president Theodore Roosevelt denounced Wilson's foreign policy, charging, 'Had it not been for Wilson's pusillanimity, the war would have been over by the summer of 1916." Indeed, Roosevelt believed that Wilson's approach to foreign policy was fundamentally and objectively evil.<sup id="cite_ref-80" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-80"><span>[</span>81<span>]</span></a></sup> He dropped the ill-fated Progressive Party and campaigned for the GOP. But Wilson gained many of the Progressive Party voters, and won a narrow victory in 1916. The GOP, under conservative leadership, regained Congress in 1918<sup id="cite_ref-81" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-81"><span>[</span>82<span>]</span></a></sup> and the White House in 1920.</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=10" title="Edit section: 1920s">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="1920s">1920s</span></h3>
<p>Conservative Republicans returned to dominance in 1920 with the election of President <a href="/wiki/Warren_G._Harding" title="Warren G. Harding">Warren G. Harding</a>, who called for a return to "normalcy." Tucker (2010) argues that the <a href="/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1924" title="United States presidential election, 1924">1924 election</a> marked the "high tide of American conservatism," as both major candidates campaigned for limited government, reduced taxes, and less regulation. A third-party candidate on the left won only 17% of the vote, as <a href="/wiki/Calvin_Coolidge" title="Calvin Coolidge">Calvin Coolidge</a> scored a landslide.<sup id="cite_ref-82" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-82"><span>[</span>83<span>]</span></a></sup> Under Coolidge (1923–29) the economy boomed and the society was stabilized by moving to Americanize the immigrants already here, and not allowing many more in.</p>
<p>A representative conservative of the 1900–1930 era was <a href="/wiki/James_M._Beck" title="James M. Beck">James M. Beck</a>, a lawyer under Presidents Roosevelt, Harding and Coolidge, and a congressman 1927–1933. His conservatism appeared in his support for nationalism, individualism, constitutionalism, laissez-faire, property rights, and opposition to reform. Conservatives like Beck saw the need to regulate bad behavior in the corporate world with the intention of protecting corporate capitalism from radical forces, but they were alarmed by the anti-business and pro-union proposals of Roosevelt after 1905. They began to question the notion of a national authority beneficial to big capital, and instead emphasized legalism, concern for the Constitution, and reverence for the American past.<sup id="cite_ref-83" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-83"><span>[</span>84<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=11" title="Edit section: Anti-Communism">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Anti-Communism">Anti-Communism</span></h3>
<p>With the success of the Communist takeover of Russia in 1917, both American political parties became strongly anti-Communist. Within the U.S., the far Left split and an <a href="/wiki/American_Communist_Party" title="American Communist Party" class="mw-redirect">American Communist Party</a>, emerged in the 1920s.<sup id="cite_ref-84" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-84"><span>[</span>85<span>]</span></a></sup> Conservatives denounced the movement as a subversion of American values and kept up relentless opposition until Communism collapsed in Russia in 1991. They paid special attention to Communist agents trying to change national policies and values in the U.S. government, the media, and academe. Conservatives gave enthusiastic support to anti-Communist agencies such as the <a href="/wiki/FBI" title="FBI" class="mw-redirect">FBI</a> and the Congressional investigations of the 1940s and 1950s, particularly those led by <a href="/wiki/Richard_Nixon" title="Richard Nixon">Richard Nixon</a> and <a href="/wiki/Joe_McCarthy" title="Joe McCarthy" class="mw-redirect">Joe McCarthy</a>. They paid special attention to ex-Communists who exposed the system, such as <a href="/wiki/Whittaker_Chambers" title="Whittaker Chambers">Whittaker Chambers</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-85" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-85"><span>[</span>86<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=12" title="Edit section: Writers and intellectuals">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Writers_and_intellectuals">Writers and intellectuals</span></h3>
<p>Classic conservative writing of the period includes <i>Democracy and Leadership</i> (1924) by <a href="/wiki/Irving_Babbitt" title="Irving Babbitt">Irving Babbitt</a>. The <a href="/wiki/Efficiency_Movement" title="Efficiency Movement">Efficiency Movement</a> attracted Progressive Republicans like <a href="/wiki/Herbert_Hoover" title="Herbert Hoover">Herbert Hoover</a> with its pro-business, quasi-engineering approach to solving social and economic problems.</p>
<p>Numerous literary figures developed a conservative sensibility and warned of threats to Western Civilization. In the 1900–1950 era <a href="/wiki/Henry_Adams" title="Henry Adams">Henry Adams</a>, <a href="/wiki/T._S._Eliot" title="T. S. Eliot">T. S. Eliot</a>, <a href="/wiki/Allen_Tate" title="Allen Tate">Allen Tate</a>, <a href="/wiki/Andrew_Lytle" title="Andrew Lytle" class="mw-redirect">Andrew Lytle</a>, <a href="/wiki/Donald_Davidson_(poet)" title="Donald Davidson (poet)">Donald Davidson</a>, and others feared that heedless scientific innovation would unleash forces that would undermine traditional Western values and lead to the collapse of civilization. Instead they searched for a rationale for promoting traditional cultural values in the face of an onslaught by moral nihilism based on historical and scientific relativism.<sup id="cite_ref-86" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-86"><span>[</span>87<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>Conservatism as an intellectual movement in the South after 1930 was represented by writers such as <a href="/wiki/Flannery_O%27Connor" title="Flannery O'Connor">Flannery O'Connor</a> and the <a href="/wiki/Southern_Agrarians" title="Southern Agrarians">Southern Agrarians</a>. The focus was on traditionalism and hierarchy.<sup id="cite_ref-87" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-87"><span>[</span>88<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>Numerous former Communist or Trotskyite writers repudiated the Left in the 1930s or 1940s and embraced conservatism, becoming contributors to <i><a href="/wiki/National_Review" title="National Review">National Review</a></i> in the 1950s. They included <a href="/wiki/Max_Eastman" title="Max Eastman">Max Eastman</a> (1883–1969), <a href="/wiki/John_Dos_Passos" title="John Dos Passos">John Dos Passos</a> (1896–1970), <a href="/wiki/Whittaker_Chambers" title="Whittaker Chambers">Whittaker Chambers</a> (1901–1961), <a href="/wiki/Will_Herberg" title="Will Herberg">Will Herberg</a> (1901–1977), and <a href="/wiki/James_Burnham" title="James Burnham">James Burnham</a> (1905–1987).<sup id="cite_ref-88" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-88"><span>[</span>89<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>Dozens of small circulation magazines aimed at intellectuals promoted the conservative cause in the 20th century.<sup id="cite_ref-89" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-89"><span>[</span>90<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=13" title="Edit section: Newspapers">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Newspapers">Newspapers</span></h3>
<p>Major newspapers in metropolitan centers with conservative editorial viewpoints have played an important part in the development of American conservatism. In the 1930–1960 era, the Hearst chain,<sup id="cite_ref-90" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-90"><span>[</span>91<span>]</span></a></sup> and the McCormick family newspapers (especially the <i><a href="/wiki/Chicago_Tribune" title="Chicago Tribune">Chicago Tribune</a></i><sup id="cite_ref-91" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-91"><span>[</span>92<span>]</span></a></sup>), and the <i><a href="/wiki/Los_Angeles_Times" title="Los Angeles Times">Los Angeles Times</a></i><sup id="cite_ref-92" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-92"><span>[</span>93<span>]</span></a></sup> championed most conservative causes, as did the <a href="/wiki/Henry_Luce" title="Henry Luce">Henry Luce</a> magazines, <i><a href="/wiki/Time_(magazine)" title="Time (magazine)">Time</a></i> and <i><a href="/wiki/Fortune_(magazine)" title="Fortune (magazine)">Fortune</a></i>.<sup id="cite_ref-93" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-93"><span>[</span>94<span>]</span></a></sup> In recent years, those media have lost their conservative edge.<sup id="cite_ref-94" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-94"><span>[</span>95<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>By 1936, most publishers favored Republican <a href="/wiki/Alf_Landon" title="Alf Landon">Alf Landon</a> over liberal Democrat Franklin Roosevelt. In the nation's 15 largest cities the newspapers that editorially endorsed Landon represented 70 percent of the circulation, while Roosevelt won 69% of the actual voters<sup id="cite_ref-95" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-95"><span>[</span>96<span>]</span></a></sup> Roosevelt's secret was to open up a new channel of communication to his supporters, through radio. His <a href="/wiki/Fireside_Chats" title="Fireside Chats" class="mw-redirect">Fireside Chats</a> especially influenced young radio broadcaster Ronald Reagan, who was an enthusiastic New Dealer at that time.<sup id="cite_ref-96" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-96"><span>[</span>97<span>]</span></a></sup> Newspaper publishers continue to favor conservative Republicans.<sup id="cite_ref-97" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-97"><span>[</span>98<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p><a href="/wiki/The_Wall_Street_Journal" title="The Wall Street Journal">The Wall Street Journal</a> has continuously been a major voice of conservatism since the 1930s, and remains so since its takeover by <a href="/wiki/Rupert_Murdoch" title="Rupert Murdoch">Rupert Murdoch</a> in 2007. As editor of the editorial page, <a href="/wiki/Vermont_C._Royster" title="Vermont C. Royster">Vermont C. Royster</a> (1958–1971), and <a href="/wiki/Robert_L._Bartley" title="Robert L. Bartley">Robert L. Bartley</a> (1972–2000), were especially influential in providing a conservative interpretation of the news on a daily basis.<sup id="cite_ref-98" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-98"><span>[</span>99<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=14" title="Edit section: Great Depression">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Great_Depression">Great Depression</span></h3>
<p>The <a href="/wiki/Great_Depression_in_the_United_States" title="Great Depression in the United States">Great Depression</a> which followed the 1929 stock market collapse led to price deflation, massive unemployment, falling farm incomes, investment losses, bank failures, business bankruptcies and reduced government revenues. <a href="/wiki/Herbert_Hoover" title="Herbert Hoover">Herbert Hoover</a>'s conservative <a href="/wiki/Protectionist" title="Protectionist" class="mw-redirect">protectionist</a> economic policies failed to halt the depression, and in the 1932 presidential election, Democrat <a href="/wiki/Franklin_Delano_Roosevelt" title="Franklin Delano Roosevelt" class="mw-redirect">Franklin Delano Roosevelt</a> won a landslide victory.</p>
<p>When Roosevelt tried to bring the country out of depression and ease the plight of the unemployed with the <a href="/wiki/New_Deal" title="New Deal">New Deal</a>, conservatives fought him every inch of the way. The counterattack first came from conservative Democrats, led by presidential nominees <a href="/wiki/John_W._Davis" title="John W. Davis">John W. Davis</a> (1924) and <a href="/wiki/Al_Smith" title="Al Smith">Al Smith</a> (1928), who mobilized business men into the <a href="/wiki/American_Liberty_League" title="American Liberty League">American Liberty League</a>. Opposition to the New Deal also came from the <a href="/wiki/Old_Right_(United_States)" title="Old Right (United States)">Old Right</a>, a group of conservative free-market anti-interventionists, originally associated with Midwestern Republicans led by Hoover and <a href="/wiki/Robert_A._Taft" title="Robert A. Taft" class="mw-redirect">Robert A. Taft</a>, the son of former President <a href="/wiki/William_Howard_Taft" title="William Howard Taft">William Howard Taft</a>. The Old Right accused Roosevelt of promoting socialism and being a "traitor to his class".</p>
<p>Vice President <a href="/wiki/John_Nance_Garner" title="John Nance Garner">John Nance Garner</a> worked with congressional allies to prevent Roosevelt from packing the Supreme Court with six new judges, so the court would not over-rule New Deal legislation as unconstitutional. U.S. Senator <a href="/wiki/Josiah_Bailey" title="Josiah Bailey">Josiah Bailey</a> (D-NC) released the "<a href="/wiki/Conservative_Manifesto" title="Conservative Manifesto">Conservative Manifesto</a>" in December 1937 which marked the beginning of the "<a href="/wiki/Conservative_coalition" title="Conservative coalition">conservative coalition</a>" between Republicans and Southern Democrats.<sup id="cite_ref-Kicker_99-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Kicker-99"><span>[</span>100<span>]</span></a></sup> Roosevelt tried and failed to purge conservative Democrats in the 1938 primaries, but all but one beat him back and the Republicans made nationwide gains in 1938. The Conservative Coalition generally controlled Congress until 1963; no major legislation passed which the Coalition opposed. Its most prominent leaders were Senator <a href="/wiki/Robert_Taft" title="Robert Taft">Robert Taft</a> (R-OH) and Senator <a href="/wiki/Richard_Russell,_Jr." title="Richard Russell, Jr.">Richard Russell</a> (D-GA). Robert Taft unsuccessfully sought the Republican nomination in 1940, 1948, and 1952, and was an opponent of American membership in <a href="/wiki/NATO" title="NATO">NATO</a> and of American participation in the <a href="/wiki/Korean_War" title="Korean War">Korean War</a>.</p>
<p>Many conservatives, especially in the Midwest, in 1939–41 favored isolationism and opposed American entry into World War II—and so did many liberals. (see <a href="/wiki/America_First_Committee" title="America First Committee">America First Committee</a>). Conservatives in the East and South were generally interventionist, as typified by <a href="/wiki/Henry_Stimson" title="Henry Stimson" class="mw-redirect">Henry Stimson</a>. However, the Japanese <a href="/wiki/Attack_on_Pearl_Harbor" title="Attack on Pearl Harbor">attack on Pearl Harbor</a> in Dec. 1941 united all Americans behind the war effort, with conservatives in Congress taking the opportunity to close down many new agencies, such as the bête noire <a href="/wiki/Works_Progress_Administration" title="Works Progress Administration">WPA</a>.</p>
<h4><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=15" title="Edit section: Jefferson's image">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Jefferson.27s_image">Jefferson's image</span></h4>
<p>In the New Deal era of the 1930s, Jefferson's memory became contested ground. <a href="/wiki/Franklin_D._Roosevelt" title="Franklin D. Roosevelt">Franklin D. Roosevelt</a> greatly admired Jefferson and had the <a href="/wiki/Jefferson_Memorial" title="Jefferson Memorial">Jefferson Memorial</a> built to honor his hero. Even more dramatic, however, was the reaction of the conservatives, as typified by the <a href="/wiki/American_Liberty_League" title="American Liberty League">American Liberty League</a> (comprising mostly conservative Democrats who resembled the <a href="/wiki/Bourbon_Democrats" title="Bourbon Democrats" class="mw-redirect">Bourbon Democrats</a> of the 1870–1900 era), and the Republican Party. Conservative Republicans abandoned their Hamiltonian views because they led to enlarged national government. Their opposition to Roosevelt's New Deal was cast in explicitly Jeffersonian small-government terms, and Jefferson became a hero of the Right.<sup id="cite_ref-100" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-100"><span>[</span>101<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=16" title="Edit section: 1945–1951">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="1945.E2.80.931951">1945–1951</span></h2>
<p>The modern conservative political movement, combining elements from both <a href="/wiki/Traditionalist_conservatism" title="Traditionalist conservatism">traditional conservatism</a> and <a href="/wiki/Libertarianism" title="Libertarianism">libertarianism</a>, emerged following <a href="/wiki/World_War_II" title="World War II">World War II</a>, but had its immediate political roots in reaction to the <a href="/wiki/New_Deal" title="New Deal">New Deal</a>. In 1946, conservative Republicans took control of Congress and opened investigations into communist infiltration of the federal government under Roosevelt. Congressman <a href="/wiki/Richard_Nixon" title="Richard Nixon">Richard Nixon</a> accused <a href="/wiki/Alger_Hiss" title="Alger Hiss">Alger Hiss</a>, a senior State Department official, of being a Soviet spy. Based on the testimony of <a href="/wiki/Whittaker_Chambers" title="Whittaker Chambers">Whittaker Chambers</a>, an ex-Communist who became a leading anti-Communist and hero to conservatives, Hiss was convicted of perjury.<sup id="cite_ref-101" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-101"><span>[</span>102<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>President <a href="/wiki/Harry_Truman" title="Harry Truman" class="mw-redirect">Harry Truman</a> (1945–53) adopted a <a href="/wiki/Containment" title="Containment">containment</a> strategy against the U.S.'s <a href="/wiki/World_War_II" title="World War II">World War II</a> ally, the <a href="/wiki/Soviet_Union" title="Soviet Union">Soviet Union</a>, through the <a href="/wiki/Truman_Doctrine" title="Truman Doctrine">Truman Doctrine</a>, the <a href="/wiki/Marshall_Plan" title="Marshall Plan">Marshall Plan</a> and <a href="/wiki/NATO" title="NATO">NATO</a> (1947–1949). Truman's Cold War policies had the support of most conservatives except for the remaining isolationists. The far left (comprising Communist Party members and fellow travelers) wanted to continue <a href="/wiki/D%C3%A9tente" title="Détente">détente</a> with Russia, and followed FDR's vice president <a href="/wiki/Henry_A._Wallace" title="Henry A. Wallace">Henry Wallace</a> in a quixotic crusade in 1948 that failed to win broad support and, indeed, largely destroyed the far left in the Democratic party.<sup id="cite_ref-102" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-102"><span>[</span>103<span>]</span></a></sup> Truman was reelected but his vaunted "Fair Deal" went nowhere, as the <a href="/wiki/Conservative_Coalition" title="Conservative Coalition" class="mw-redirect">Conservative Coalition</a> set the domestic agenda in Congress. However, the Coalition did not play a role in foreign affairs.</p>
<p>In 1947 the <a href="/wiki/Conservative_Coalition" title="Conservative Coalition" class="mw-redirect">Conservative Coalition</a> in Congress passed the <a href="/wiki/Taft_Hartley_Act" title="Taft Hartley Act" class="mw-redirect">Taft Hartley Act</a>, balancing the rights of management and unions, and delegitimizing Communist union leaders. However, the major job of rooting out Communists from labor unions and the Democratic party was undertaken by liberals, such as <a href="/wiki/Walter_Reuther" title="Walter Reuther">Walter Reuther</a> of the autoworkers union<sup id="cite_ref-103" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-103"><span>[</span>104<span>]</span></a></sup> and <a href="/wiki/Ronald_Reagan" title="Ronald Reagan">Ronald Reagan</a> of the Screen Actors Guild (Reagan was a liberal Democrat at the time).<sup id="cite_ref-104" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-104"><span>[</span>105<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>A typical conservative Republican in Congress was <a href="/wiki/Noah_M._Mason" title="Noah M. Mason">Noah M. Mason</a> (1882–1965), who represented a rural downstate district in Illinois from 1937 to 1962. Not nearly as flamboyant or well known as his colleague <a href="/wiki/Everett_McKinley_Dirksen" title="Everett McKinley Dirksen" class="mw-redirect">Everett McKinley Dirksen</a>, He ardently supported states' rights in order to minimize the federal role, for he feared federal regulation of business. He distrusted Roosevelt, and gave many speeches against high federal spending. He called out New Dealers, such as Eveline Burns, Henry A. Wallace, Adolph A. Berle, Jr., and Paul Porter, as socialists, and suggested their policies resembled fascism. He fought Communism as a member of the <a href="/wiki/House_Un-American_Activities_Committee" title="House Un-American Activities Committee">House Un-American Activities Committee</a>(1938–43), and in 1950 he championed Joe McCarthy's exposes.<sup id="cite_ref-105" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-105"><span>[</span>106<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=17" title="Edit section: Korean War">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Korean_War">Korean War</span></h3>
<p>When the Communists from North Korea invaded South Korea in 1950 Truman adopted a <a href="/wiki/Rollback" title="Rollback">rollback</a> strategy, planning to free the entire country by force. Truman decided not to obtain Congressional approval for his war—he relied on UN approval—which left the Republicans free to attack his war policies. Taft said Truman's decision was "a complete usurpation by the president."<sup id="cite_ref-106" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-106"><span>[</span>107<span>]</span></a></sup> Truman's reliance on the UN reinforced conservative distrust of that body. With the Allies on the verge of victory, the Chinese Communists entered the war and drove the Allies back with terrific fighting in sub-zero weather. Truman reversed positions, dropped the rollback policy, and fired the conservative hero General <a href="/wiki/Douglas_MacArthur" title="Douglas MacArthur">Douglas MacArthur</a> (who wanted rollback), and settled for <a href="/wiki/Containment" title="Containment">containment</a>. Truman's acceptance of the status quo at a cost of 37,000 Americans killed and undermined Truman's base of support. Truman did poorly in the early 1952 and primaries was forced to drop his reelection bid. The Democrats nominated a liberal intellectual with no ties to Roosevelt or Truman, Illinois Governor <a href="/wiki/Adlai_Stevenson_II" title="Adlai Stevenson II">Adlai Stevenson II</a>.</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=18" title="Edit section: McCarthyism: 1950–54">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="McCarthyism:_1950.E2.80.9354">McCarthyism: 1950–54</span></h3>
<div class="rellink relarticle mainarticle">Main article: <a href="/wiki/McCarthyism" title="McCarthyism">McCarthyism</a></div>
<div class="thumb tright">
<div class="thumbinner" style="width:227px;"><a href="/wiki/File:Is_this_tomorrow.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Is_this_tomorrow.jpg/225px-Is_this_tomorrow.jpg" width="225" height="326" class="thumbimage" /></a>
<div class="thumbcaption">
<div class="magnify"><a href="/wiki/File:Is_this_tomorrow.jpg" class="internal" title="Enlarge"><img src="//bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.18/common/images/magnify-clip.png" width="15" height="11" alt="" /></a></div>
A 1947 booklet published by the Catholic Catechetical Guild Educational Society raising the specter of a Communist takeover</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>When anxiety over Communism in Korea and China reached a fever pitch, an otherwise obscure Senator, <a href="/wiki/Joe_McCarthy" title="Joe McCarthy" class="mw-redirect">Joe McCarthy</a> of Wisconsin, launched extremely high-visibility investigations into the cover-up of spies in the government. McCarthy used careless tactics that allowed his opponents to effectively counterattack. Irish Catholics (including Buckley and the <a href="/wiki/Kennedy_Family" title="Kennedy Family" class="mw-redirect">Kennedy Family</a>) were intensely anti-Communist and defended McCarthy (a fellow Irish Catholic).<sup id="cite_ref-107" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-107"><span>[</span>108<span>]</span></a></sup> Paterfamilias <a href="/wiki/Joseph_Kennedy" title="Joseph Kennedy" class="mw-redirect">Joseph Kennedy</a> (1888–1969), a very active conservative Democrat, was an ardent supporter of McCarthy, and got his son <a href="/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy" title="Robert F. Kennedy">Robert F. Kennedy</a> a job with McCarthy. McCarthy had talked of "twenty years of treason" (i.e. since Roosevelt's election in 1932). When he in 1953 he started talking of "21 years of treason" and launched a major attack on the Army for promoting a Communist dentist in the medical corps, his recklessness was too much for Eisenhower, who encouraged Republicans to censure McCarthy formally in 1954. The Senator's power collapsed overnight. Senator <a href="/wiki/John_F._Kennedy" title="John F. Kennedy">John F. Kennedy</a> did not vote for censure.</p>
<p>Arthur Herman says, "McCarthy was always a more important figure to American liberals than to conservatives."<sup id="cite_ref-108" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-108"><span>[</span>109<span>]</span></a></sup> McCarthy defined the liberal target, and made liberals look like the innocent victims. In recent years conservatives have not so much defended McCarthy's rough tactics as argued, using fresh evidence from Soviet records such as the <a href="/wiki/Venona_project" title="Venona project">Venona project</a>, that the Left at the time was not all innocent and indeed that some Leftists were covering up networks of Communist spies.<sup id="cite_ref-109" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-109"><span>[</span>110<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=19" title="Edit section: 1950s">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="1950s">1950s</span></h2>
<p>Examining postwar conservative intellectual history, Kim Phillips-Fein writes:</p>
<dl>
<dd>The most influential synthesis of the subject remains <a href="/wiki/George_H._Nash" title="George H. Nash">George H. Nash</a>'s <i>The Conservative Intellectual Tradition since 1945</i>.... He argued that postwar conservatism brought together three powerful and partially contradictory intellectual currents that previously had largely been independent of each other: libertarianism, traditionalism, and anticommunism. Each particular strain of thought had predecessors earlier in the twentieth (and even nineteenth) centuries, but they were joined in their distinctive postwar formulation through the leadership of William F. Buckley Jr. and <i>National Review.</i> The fusion of these different, competing, and not easily reconciled schools of thought led to the creation, Nash argued, of a coherent modern Right."<sup id="cite_ref-110" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-110"><span>[</span>111<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-111" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-111"><span>[</span>112<span>]</span></a></sup></dd>
</dl>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=20" title="Edit section: Eisenhower">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Eisenhower">Eisenhower</span></h3>
<p>Isolationism had weakened the Old Right, as shown by General <a href="/wiki/Dwight_D._Eisenhower" title="Dwight D. Eisenhower">Eisenhower's</a> defeat of Senator <a href="/wiki/Robert_Taft" title="Robert Taft">Robert Taft</a> for the GOP nomination in 1952. Eisenhower then won the <a href="/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1952" title="United States presidential election, 1952">1952 election</a> by crusading against what he called Truman's failures: "Korea, Communism and Corruption." Eisenhower quickly ended the Korean War, which most conservatives by then opposed and adopted a conservative fiscal policy while cooperating with Taft, who became the Senate Majority Leader. Eisenhower as president promoted "Modern Republicanism," involving limited government, balanced budgets, and curbing government spending. Although taking a firm anti-Communist position, Ike cut defense spending by shifting the national strategy from reliance on expensive army divisions to cheap nuclear weapons. He tried (but failed) to eliminate expensive supports for farm prices, and tried (and succeeded) to reduce the federal role by returning offshore oil reserves to the states. Eisenhower kept the regulatory and welfare policies of the <a href="/wiki/New_Deal" title="New Deal">New Deal</a>, with the Republicans taking credit for the expansion of Social Security. Eisenhower sought to minimize conflict among economic and racial groups in the quest for social harmony, peace and prosperity. He was reelected by a landslide in 1956.<sup id="cite_ref-112" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-112"><span>[</span>113<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-113" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-113"><span>[</span>114<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=21" title="Edit section: Russell Kirk">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Russell_Kirk">Russell Kirk</span></h3>
<p>While Republicans in Washington were tweaking the New Deal, the most critical opposition to liberalism came from writers. <a href="/wiki/Russell_Kirk" title="Russell Kirk">Russell Kirk</a> (1918–1994) claimed that both classical and modern liberalism placed too much emphasis on economic issues and failed to address man's spiritual nature, and called for a plan of action for a conservative political movement. He said that conservative leaders should appeal to farmers, small towns, the churches, and others.<sup id="cite_ref-114" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-114"><span>[</span>115<span>]</span></a></sup> This target group is similar to the core constituency of the <a href="/wiki/British_Conservative_Party" title="British Conservative Party" class="mw-redirect">British Conservative Party</a>.</p>
<p>Kirk adamantly opposed libertarian ideas, which he saw as a threat to true conservatism. In <i>Libertarians: the Chirping Sectaries</i> Kirk wrote that the only thing libertarians and conservatives have in common is a detestation of collectivism. "What else do conservatives and libertarians profess in common? The answer to that question is simple: nothing. Nor will they ever have.".<sup id="cite_ref-115" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-115"><span>[</span>116<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=22" title="Edit section: William F. Buckley and the National Review">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="William_F._Buckley_and_the_National_Review">William F. Buckley and the <i>National Review</i></span></h3>
<div class="thumb tright">
<div class="thumbinner" style="width:162px;"><a href="/wiki/File:William_F._Buckley,_Jr._1985.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0a/William_F._Buckley%2C_Jr._1985.jpg/160px-William_F._Buckley%2C_Jr._1985.jpg" width="160" height="237" class="thumbimage" /></a>
<div class="thumbcaption">
<div class="magnify"><a href="/wiki/File:William_F._Buckley,_Jr._1985.jpg" class="internal" title="Enlarge"><img src="//bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.18/common/images/magnify-clip.png" width="15" height="11" alt="" /></a></div>
<a href="/wiki/William_F._Buckley,_Jr." title="William F. Buckley, Jr.">William F. Buckley, Jr.</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The most effective organizer and proponent of conservative ideas was <a href="/wiki/William_F._Buckley,_Jr." title="William F. Buckley, Jr.">William F. Buckley, Jr.</a> (1925–2008), the founder of <i><a href="/wiki/National_Review" title="National Review">National Review</a></i> in 1955 and a highly visible writer and media personality. There had been numerous small circulation magazines on the right before, but the <i>National Review</i> gained national attention and shaped the conservative movement, due to strong editing and a strong stable of regular contributors. Erudite, witty and tireless, Buckley inspired a new enthusiasm.<sup id="cite_ref-116" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-116"><span>[</span>117<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>Buckley assembled an eclectic group of writers: traditionalists, Catholic intellectuals, libertarians and ex-Communists. They included: <a href="/wiki/Russell_Kirk" title="Russell Kirk">Russell Kirk</a>, <a href="/wiki/James_Burnham" title="James Burnham">James Burnham</a>, <a href="/wiki/Frank_Meyer_(political_philosopher)" title="Frank Meyer (political philosopher)">Frank Meyer</a>, <a href="/wiki/Willmoore_Kendall" title="Willmoore Kendall">Willmoore Kendall</a>, <a href="/wiki/L._Brent_Bozell_Jr." title="L. Brent Bozell Jr." class="mw-redirect">L. Brent Bozell</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Whittaker_Chambers" title="Whittaker Chambers">Whittaker Chambers</a> In the magazine’s founding statement Buckley wrote:<sup id="cite_ref-117" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-117"><span>[</span>118<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<blockquote>
<p>The launching of a conservative weekly journal of opinion in a country widely assumed to be a bastion of conservatism at first glance looks like a work of supererogation, rather like publishing a royalist weekly within the walls of Buckingham Palace. It is not that of course; if <i>National Review</i> is superfluous, it is so for very different reasons: It stands athwart history, yelling Stop, at a time when no other is inclined to do so, or to have much patience with those who so urge it.</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=23" title="Edit section: Milton Friedman and Libertarian economics">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Milton_Friedman_and_Libertarian_economics">Milton Friedman and Libertarian economics</span></h3>
<p>Austrian economist <a href="/wiki/F.A._Hayek" title="F.A. Hayek" class="mw-redirect">F.A. Hayek</a> (1899–1992) in 1944 galvanized opponents of the New Deal by arguing that the left in Britain was leading that nation down the "road to serfdom".<sup id="cite_ref-118" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-118"><span>[</span>119<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>More influential was the <a href="/wiki/Chicago_School_of_Economics" title="Chicago School of Economics" class="mw-redirect">Chicago School of Economics</a>, led by <a href="/wiki/Milton_Friedman" title="Milton Friedman">Milton Friedman</a> (1912–2006) and <a href="/wiki/George_J._Stigler" title="George J. Stigler" class="mw-redirect">George J. Stigler</a> (1911–1991), who advocated <a href="/wiki/Neoclassical_economics" title="Neoclassical economics">neoclassical</a> and <a href="/wiki/Monetarism" title="Monetarism">monetarist</a> public policy. The Chicago School provided a vigorous criticism of regulation, on the grounds that it led to control of the regulations by the regulated industries themselves. Since 1974, government regulation of industry and banking has greatly decreased.<sup id="cite_ref-119" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-119"><span>[</span>120<span>]</span></a></sup> The School attacked <a href="/wiki/Keynesian_economics" title="Keynesian economics">Keynesian economics</a>, the dominant theory of economics, which Friedman claimed was based on unsound models. The "stagflation" of the 1970s (combining high inflation and high unemployment) was impossible according to Keynesian models,<sup id="cite_ref-120" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-120"><span>[</span>121<span>]</span></a></sup> but was predicted by Friedman, giving his approach credibility among the experts.<sup id="cite_ref-121" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-121"><span>[</span>122<span>]</span></a></sup><sup class="noprint Inline-Template" style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability" title="Wikipedia:Verifiability"><span title="The material in the vicinity of this tag needs to be fact-checked with the cited source(s) from September 2011">verification needed</span></a></i>]</sup></p>
<p>By the late 1960s, Ebenstein argues, Friedman was "the most prominent conservative public intellectual at least in the United States and probably in the world."<sup id="cite_ref-122" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-122"><span>[</span>123<span>]</span></a></sup> Friedman advocated, in lectures, weekly columns, and books and on television, greater reliance on the marketplace. Americans should be "Free to Choose". He convinced many conservatives the draft was inefficient and unfair; Nixon ended it in 1973. Nine Chicago School economists won Nobel Prizes, and their ideas on deregulation became widely accepted.<sup id="cite_ref-123" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-123"><span>[</span>124<span>]</span></a></sup> Friedman's "monetarism" did not fare as well, with current monetary practice targeting inflation, not the money supply.<sup id="cite_ref-124" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-124"><span>[</span>125<span>]</span></a></sup> Early in his academic career <a href="/wiki/Ben_Bernanke" title="Ben Bernanke">Ben Bernanke</a> published a modified view that the banking crises of the early 1930s deepened and prolonged the depression.<sup id="cite_ref-125" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-125"><span>[</span>126<span>]</span></a></sup> As Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Bernanke's energetic reaction to the great financial crisis of 2008 was based on Friedman's ideas.<sup id="cite_ref-126" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-126"><span>[</span>127<span>]</span></a></sup><sup class="noprint Inline-Template" style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability" title="Wikipedia:Verifiability"><span title="The material in the vicinity of this tag needs to be fact-checked with the cited source(s) from September 2011">verification needed</span></a></i>]</sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=24" title="Edit section: John Birch Society">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="John_Birch_Society">John Birch Society</span></h3>
<p><a href="/wiki/Robert_W._Welch_Jr." title="Robert W. Welch Jr." class="mw-redirect">Robert W. Welch Jr.</a> (1900–1985) founded the <a href="/wiki/John_Birch_Society" title="John Birch Society">John Birch Society</a> as an authoritarian top-down force to combat Communism. It had tens of thousands of members and distributed books, pamphlets and the magazine <i>American Opinion.</i> It was so tightly controlled by Welch that its effectiveness was limited, and it focused on calls to impeach Chief Justice <a href="/wiki/Earl_Warren" title="Earl Warren">Earl Warren</a>, as well as supporting local police<sup id="cite_ref-127" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-127"><span>[</span>128<span>]</span></a></sup> Instead it became a lighting rod for liberal attacks, and indeed Welch was denounced by Goldwater, Buckley and other mainstream conservatives.</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=25" title="Edit section: Internal disagreements">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Internal_disagreements">Internal disagreements</span></h3>
<p>The main disagreement between Kirk, who would become described as a <a href="/wiki/Traditionalist_conservatism" title="Traditionalist conservatism">traditionalist conservative</a>, and the libertarians was whether tradition and virtue or liberty should be their primary concern. <a href="/wiki/Frank_Meyer_(political_philosopher)" title="Frank Meyer (political philosopher)">Frank Meyer</a> tried to resolve the dispute with "<a href="/wiki/Fusionism_(politics)" title="Fusionism (politics)" class="mw-redirect">fusionism</a>": America could not conserve its traditions without economic freedom. He also noted that they were united in opposition to "big government" and made anti-communism the glue that would unite them. The term "conservative" was used to describe the views of <i>National Review</i> supporters, despite initial protests from the libertarians, because the term "liberal" had become associated with "New Deal" supporters. They were also later known as the "<a href="/wiki/New_Right" title="New Right">New Right</a>", as opposed to the <a href="/wiki/New_Left" title="New Left">New Left</a>.</p>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=26" title="Edit section: 1960s">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="1960s">1960s</span></h2>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=27" title="Edit section: Wallace in 1963">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Wallace_in_1963">Wallace in 1963</span></h3>
<p>In January 1963 the newly elected governor of Alabama, Democrat <a href="/wiki/George_Wallace" title="George Wallace">George Wallace</a>, electrified the white South by crying out for "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever!" He later stood in the schoolhouse door in a failed attempt to stop federal officials from desegregating the University of Alabama. Wallace communicated traditional conservatism in a populist, anti-elitist and "earthy" language that resonated with rural and working class voters who long had been part of the <a href="/wiki/New_Deal_Coalition" title="New Deal Coalition" class="mw-redirect">New Deal Coalition</a>. He was able to exploit anticommunism, yearnings for "traditional" American values and dislike of civil rights agitators, anti-war protesters and sexual exhibitionists. The Wallace movement did help break away a major element of the New Deal coalition—less educated, powerless low income whites<sup id="cite_ref-128" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-128"><span>[</span>129<span>]</span></a></sup>--which decades later made its way into the GOP in the South. He helped pave the way for the conservative blacklash of the 1970s and 1980s.<sup id="cite_ref-129" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-129"><span>[</span>130<span>]</span></a></sup> However, Wallace did not receive support from Goldwater, Buckley or any mainstream conservative.<sup id="cite_ref-130" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-130"><span>[</span>131<span>]</span></a></sup> He did get support from the John Birch Society and the <a href="/wiki/Fred_Schwarz#Anti-Communism" title="Fred Schwarz">Christian Anti-Communism Crusade</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-131" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-131"><span>[</span>132<span>]</span></a></sup> Wallace's populist base of poor white farmers, echoed earlier racist demagogues such as <a href="/wiki/Thomas_E._Watson" title="Thomas E. Watson">Tom Watson of Georgia</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-132" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-132"><span>[</span>133<span>]</span></a></sup> As governor of Alabama (and, when he had his wife elected, as husband of the governor) Wallace combined his reactionary position on civil rights with relatively liberal programs, such as support for women.<sup id="cite_ref-133" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-133"><span>[</span>134<span>]</span></a></sup> Despite this support for state-level government welfare, Wallace did not believe in government intervention in free enterprise and private property. He accused liberals of using the federal government to interfere in "everybody's private business" and as a conservative believed in "freedom for business and labor".<sup id="cite_ref-134" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-134"><span>[</span>135<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=28" title="Edit section: Goldwater in 1964">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Goldwater_in_1964">Goldwater in 1964</span></h3>
<div class="thumb tright">
<div class="thumbinner" style="width:162px;"><a href="/wiki/File:BarryGoldwater.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/BarryGoldwater.jpg/160px-BarryGoldwater.jpg" width="160" height="200" class="thumbimage" /></a>
<div class="thumbcaption">
<div class="magnify"><a href="/wiki/File:BarryGoldwater.jpg" class="internal" title="Enlarge"><img src="//bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.18/common/images/magnify-clip.png" width="15" height="11" alt="" /></a></div>
Senator Barry Goldwater</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The conservatives united behind the unsuccessful 1964 presidential campaign of Arizona Senator <a href="/wiki/Barry_Goldwater" title="Barry Goldwater">Barry Goldwater</a> (1919–1998), who had published <i><a href="/wiki/The_Conscience_of_a_Conservative" title="The Conscience of a Conservative">The Conscience of a Conservative</a></i> (1960), a best-selling book that explained modern conservative theory. Support for the campaign came from numerous grass roots activists, such as <a href="/wiki/Phyllis_Schlafly" title="Phyllis Schlafly">Phyllis Schlafly</a> (1924– ) and from the newly formed <a href="/wiki/Young_Americans_for_Freedom" title="Young Americans for Freedom">Young Americans for Freedom</a>, a project sponsored by Buckley. In 1965 conservatives campaigned for Buckley as a third party candidate for Mayor of New York and in 1966 for <a href="/wiki/Ronald_Reagan" title="Ronald Reagan">Ronald Reagan</a> (1911–2004), who was elected governor of California.</p>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=29" title="Edit section: 1970s">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="1970s">1970s</span></h2>
<p>Governor Reagan increasingly dominated the conservative movement, especially in his failed 1976 quest for the Republican presidential nomination and his successful run in 1980.</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=30" title="Edit section: Religious Right">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Religious_Right">Religious Right</span></h3>
<div class="rellink">Further information: <a href="/wiki/Christian_right" title="Christian right">Christian right</a>&#160;and&#160;<a href="/wiki/Religious_right" title="Religious right">Religious right</a></div>
<p>By the 1950s conservatives were emphasizing the <a href="/wiki/Judeo-Christian" title="Judeo-Christian">Judeo-Christian</a> roots of their values.<sup id="cite_ref-135" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-135"><span>[</span>136<span>]</span></a></sup> Goldwater noted that conservatives "believed the communist projection of man as a producing, consuming animal to be used and discarded was antithetical to all the Judeo-Christian understandings which are the foundations upon which the Republic stands."<sup id="cite_ref-136" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-136"><span>[</span>137<span>]</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Ronald_Reagan" title="Ronald Reagan">Ronald Reagan</a> frequently emphasized Judeo-Christian values as necessary ingredients in the fight against communism.<sup id="cite_ref-137" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-137"><span>[</span>138<span>]</span></a></sup> Belief in the superiority of Western Judeo-Christian traditions led conservatives to downplay the aspirations of Third World and to denigrate the value of foreign aid.<sup id="cite_ref-138" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-138"><span>[</span>139<span>]</span></a></sup> Since the 1990s, the phrase "Judeo-Christian" has been primarily used by conservatives.<sup id="cite_ref-139" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-139"><span>[</span>140<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>Evangelicals had been politicized in the 1920s, battling to impose prohibition and to stop the teaching of evolution in the schools (as in the <a href="/wiki/Scopes_Trial" title="Scopes Trial">Scopes Trial</a> of 1925), but had largely been politically quiet since the 1930s.<sup id="cite_ref-140" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-140"><span>[</span>141<span>]</span></a></sup> The emergence of the "religious right" as a political force and part of the conservative coalition dates from the 1970s and was a response to secularization and Supreme Court rulings on school prayer and abortion. According to Wilcox and Robinson, "The Christian Right is an attempt to restore Judeo-Christian values to a country that is in deep moral decline. ....[They] believe that society suffers from the lack of a firm basis of Judeo-Christian values and they seek to write laws that embody those values".<sup id="cite_ref-141" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-141"><span>[</span>142<span>]</span></a></sup> Especially important was the hostile reaction to the <i><a href="/wiki/Roe_v._Wade" title="Roe v. Wade">Roe v. Wade</a></i> Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion, which brought together Catholics (who had long opposed abortion) and evangelical Protestants (who were new to the issue).<sup id="cite_ref-142" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-142"><span>[</span>143<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>Noting the anger of Catholic bishops at losing state funding because of the Catholic opposition to gay adoptive parents, along with other social issues, the <i>New York Times</i> reported in late 2011 that:</p>
<dl>
<dd>"The idea that religious Americans are now the victims of government-backed persecution is now a frequent theme not just for Catholic bishops, but also for Republican presidential candidates and conservative evangelicals."<sup id="cite_ref-143" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-143"><span>[</span>144<span>]</span></a></sup></dd>
</dl>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=31" title="Edit section: Neoconservatives">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Neoconservatives">Neoconservatives</span></h3>
<p>The 1970s saw the movement of many prominent liberal intellectuals to the right, many of them from New York City Jewish roots and well-established academic reputations (Wald 1987)<sup id="cite_ref-144" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-144"><span>[</span>145<span>]</span></a></sup>They had become disillusioned with liberalism, especially the foreign policy of détente with the Soviet Union.</p>
<p><a href="/wiki/Irving_Kristol" title="Irving Kristol">Irving Kristol</a> and <a href="/wiki/Leo_Strauss" title="Leo Strauss">Leo Strauss</a> were founders of the movement. The magazines <i><a href="/wiki/Commentary_(magazine)" title="Commentary (magazine)">Commentary</a></i> and <i><a href="/wiki/Public_Interest" title="Public Interest" class="mw-redirect">Public Interest</a></i> were their key outlets, as well as op-ed articles for major newspapers and position papers for think tanks. Activists around Democratic senator <a href="/wiki/Henry_M._Jackson" title="Henry M. Jackson">Henry Jackson</a> became deeply involved as well. Prominent spokesmen include <a href="/wiki/Gertrude_Himmelfarb" title="Gertrude Himmelfarb">Gertrude Himmelfarb</a>, <a href="/wiki/Bill_Kristol" title="Bill Kristol" class="mw-redirect">Bill Kristol</a>, <a href="/wiki/Paul_Wolfowitz" title="Paul Wolfowitz">Paul Wolfowitz</a>, <a href="/wiki/Lewis_Libby" title="Lewis Libby" class="mw-redirect">Lewis Libby</a>, <a href="/wiki/Norman_Podhoretz" title="Norman Podhoretz">Norman Podhoretz</a>, <a href="/wiki/Richard_Pipes" title="Richard Pipes">Richard Pipes</a>, <a href="/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer" title="Charles Krauthammer">Charles Krauthammer</a>, <a href="/wiki/Richard_Perle" title="Richard Perle">Richard Perle</a>, <a href="/wiki/Robert_Kagan" title="Robert Kagan">Robert Kagan</a>, <a href="/wiki/Elliott_Abrams" title="Elliott Abrams">Elliott Abrams</a> and <a href="/wiki/Ben_Wattenberg" title="Ben Wattenberg" class="mw-redirect">Ben Wattenberg</a>. Meanwhile, Senator <a href="/wiki/Daniel_Patrick_Moynihan" title="Daniel Patrick Moynihan">Daniel Patrick Moynihan</a> was highly sympathetic but remained a Democrat. Some of Strauss' influential neoconservative disciples included Supreme Court nominee <a href="/wiki/Robert_Bork" title="Robert Bork">Robert Bork</a>, <a href="/wiki/Paul_Wolfowitz" title="Paul Wolfowitz">Paul Wolfowitz</a> (who became Deputy Secretary of Defense), <a href="/wiki/Alan_Keyes" title="Alan Keyes">Alan Keyes</a> (who became Assistant Secretary of State), <a href="/wiki/William_Bennett" title="William Bennett">William Bennett</a> (who became Secretary of Education), <i>Weekly Standard</i> editor <a href="/wiki/William_Kristol" title="William Kristol">William Kristol</a>, political philosopher <a href="/wiki/Allan_Bloom" title="Allan Bloom">Allan Bloom</a>, writer <a href="/wiki/John_Podhoretz" title="John Podhoretz">John Podhoretz</a>, college president <a href="/wiki/John_Agresto" title="John Agresto">John Agresto</a>; political scientist <a href="/wiki/Harry_V._Jaffa" title="Harry V. Jaffa">Harry V. Jaffa</a>; and novelist <a href="/wiki/Saul_Bellow" title="Saul Bellow">Saul Bellow</a>.</p>
<p>Neoconservatives generally support pro-business policies. Some went on to high policy-making or advisory positions in the Reagan, Bush I and Bush II administrations.</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=32" title="Edit section: Conservatism in the South">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Conservatism_in_the_South">Conservatism in the South</span></h3>
<p>The growth of conservatism within the Republican Party attracted white conservative <a href="/wiki/Southern_Democrats" title="Southern Democrats">Southern Democrats</a> in presidential elections. A few big names switched to the GOP, including South Carolina Senator <a href="/wiki/Strom_Thurmond" title="Strom Thurmond">Strom Thurmond</a> in 1964 and Texas Governor <a href="/wiki/John_Connally" title="John Connally">John Connally</a> in 1973. Starting in 1968 the GOP dominated most presidential elections in the South (1976 was the lone exception), but not until the 1990s did the GOP become dominant in state and local politics in the region. The Republicans built their strength among Southern Baptists and other religious Fundamentalists, among the middle class suburbs, and among migrants from the North, and Cubans in Florida. Meanwhile, starting in 1964, African American voters in the South began to show overwhelming support for the Democratic Party at both the presidential and local levels. They elected a number of Congressmen and mayors. By 1990 there were still many moderate white Democrats holding office in the South, but when they retired they were typically replaced by much more conservative Republicans, or by liberal blacks.<sup id="cite_ref-Merle_Black_2003_62-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Merle_Black_2003-62"><span>[</span>63<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=33" title="Edit section: Think tanks and foundations">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Think_tanks_and_foundations">Think tanks and foundations</span></h3>
<p>In 1971 <a href="/wiki/Lewis_F._Powell" title="Lewis F. Powell" class="mw-redirect">Lewis F. Powell</a> Jr. urged conservatives to retake command of public discourse by "financing <a href="/wiki/Think_tanks" title="Think tanks" class="mw-redirect">think tanks</a>, reshaping mass media and seeking influence in universities and the judiciary."<sup id="cite_ref-145" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-145"><span>[</span>146<span>]</span></a></sup> Aware that the <a href="/wiki/Brookings_Institution" title="Brookings Institution">Brookings Institution</a> had played an influential role for decades in promoting liberal ideas, the <a href="/wiki/American_Enterprise_Institute" title="American Enterprise Institute">American Enterprise Institute</a> and later the <a href="/wiki/Heritage_Foundation" title="Heritage Foundation" class="mw-redirect">Heritage Foundation</a> were designed as counterparts on the right. They brought in intellectuals for shorter or longer periods, financed research, and disseminated the products through conferences, publications, and systematic media campaigns. They typically focused on projects with immediate policy implications.<sup id="cite_ref-146" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-146"><span>[</span>147<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>In the following decades conservative policies once considered outside the liberal mainstream—such as abolishing welfare, privatizing <a href="/wiki/Social_Security_(United_States)" title="Social Security (United States)">Social Security</a>, <a href="/wiki/Deregulating" title="Deregulating" class="mw-redirect">deregulating</a> banking, embracing preemptive war—were taken seriously and sometimes passed into law due to the work of the <a href="/wiki/Hoover_Institution" title="Hoover Institution">Hoover Institution</a>, Heritage Foundation, the American Enterprise Institute and smaller tanks.<sup id="cite_ref-147" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-147"><span>[</span>148<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>Complaining that mainstream academe was hostile to conservatives, several foundations have been especially active in funding conservative intellectuals, notably the <a href="/wiki/Adolph_Coors_Foundation" title="Adolph Coors Foundation">Adolph Coors Foundation</a>, the <a href="/wiki/Bradley_Foundation" title="Bradley Foundation">Bradley Foundation</a>, the <a href="/wiki/Koch_Family_Foundations" title="Koch Family Foundations">Koch Family Foundations</a>, the <a href="/wiki/Scaife_Foundations" title="Scaife Foundations">Scaife Foundations</a>, and (until it closed in 2005), the <a href="/wiki/John_M._Olin_Foundation" title="John M. Olin Foundation">John M. Olin Foundation</a>. They typically have emphasized the need for market-based solutions to national problems.<sup id="cite_ref-148" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-148"><span>[</span>149<span>]</span></a></sup> The foundations often invested in conservative student publications and organizations, such as the <a href="/wiki/Intercollegiate_Studies_Institute" title="Intercollegiate Studies Institute">Intercollegiate Studies Institute</a>, and for law students the <a href="/wiki/Federalist_Society" title="Federalist Society">Federalist Society</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-149" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-149"><span>[</span>150<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=34" title="Edit section: Nixon, Ford, Carter">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Nixon.2C_Ford.2C_Carter">Nixon, Ford, Carter</span></h3>
<div class="rellink boilerplate seealso">See also: <a href="/wiki/American_liberalism#Nixon_and_the_liberal_consensus" title="American liberalism" class="mw-redirect">Nixon and the liberal consensus</a></div>
<p>The Republican administrations of President <a href="/wiki/Richard_Nixon" title="Richard Nixon">Richard Nixon</a> (1969–74) and <a href="/wiki/Gerald_Ford" title="Gerald Ford">Gerald Ford</a> (1974–77) were characterized by their emphasis on <a href="/wiki/D%C3%A9tente" title="Détente">détente</a> and on economic intervention through wage and price controls. Ford angered conservatives by continuing <a href="/wiki/Henry_Kissinger" title="Henry Kissinger">Henry Kissinger</a> as Secretary of State and pushing his policy of <a href="/wiki/D%C3%A9tente" title="Détente">détente</a> with the Soviet Union. Conservatives finally found a new champion in <a href="/wiki/Ronald_Reagan" title="Ronald Reagan">Ronald Reagan</a>, whose 8 years as governor of California had just ended in 1976, and supported his campaign for the Republican nomination. Ford narrowly won renomination but lost the White House. Following major gains by liberal Democrats in the 1974 midterm election, the American people elected <a href="/wiki/Jimmy_Carter" title="Jimmy Carter">Jimmy Carter</a>. Carter proved much too liberal for his fellow Southern Baptists (they voted for him in 1976 but not 1980), too conservative for the mainstream of the Democratic Party, and insufficiently competent in foreign affairs for many. Carter realized there was a strong national sense of malaise, for which he blamed the people, as inflation skyrocketed, interest rates soared, the economy stagnated, and prolonged humiliation resulted when <a href="/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis" title="Iran hostage crisis">Islamic militants in Tehran</a> kept American diplomats hostage for 444 days in 1979–81.<sup id="cite_ref-150" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-150"><span>[</span>151<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=35" title="Edit section: 1970s recessions">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="1970s_recessions">1970s recessions</span></h3>
<div class="rellink boilerplate seealso">See also: <a href="/wiki/1970s_recession#1970s_recession" title="1970s recession" class="mw-redirect">1970s recession</a></div>
<p>During recessions of the 1970s inflation and unemployment simultaneously soared and budget deficits were first starting to raise alarms. America was still a moderately progressive country in the early ’70s: citizens supported social programs and voted down efforts to cut taxes. But by the end of the decade, a full-fledged tax revolt had gotten under way, led by the overwhelming passage in 1978 of Proposition 13 in California, which cut property taxes sharply, and the growing Congressional support for the Kemp-Roth tax bill, which proposed cutting federal income taxes by 30 percent.<sup id="cite_ref-151" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-151"><span>[</span>152<span>]</span></a></sup> Supply-side economics developed during the 1970s in response to <a href="/wiki/Keynesian" title="Keynesian" class="mw-redirect">Keynesian</a> economic policy, and in particular the failure of <a href="/wiki/Demand_management" title="Demand management">demand management</a> to <a href="/wiki/Stabilization_policy" title="Stabilization policy">stabilize</a> Western economies during the <a href="/wiki/Stagflation" title="Stagflation">stagflation</a> of the 1970s, in the wake of the <a href="/wiki/1973_oil_crisis" title="1973 oil crisis">oil crisis in 1973</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-case_780_152-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-case_780-152"><span>[</span>153<span>]</span></a></sup> It drew on a range of non-Keynesian economic thought, particularly the <a href="/wiki/Chicago_School" title="Chicago School" class="mw-redirect">Chicago School</a> and <a href="/wiki/New_classical_macroeconomics" title="New classical macroeconomics">Neo-Classical School</a>.<sup class="Template-Fact" style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed" title="Wikipedia:Citation needed"><span title="This claim needs references to reliable sources from November 2011">citation needed</span></a></i>]</sup> The intellectual roots of supply-side economics have also been traced back to various early economic thinkers, such as <a href="/wiki/Ibn_Khaldun" title="Ibn Khaldun">Ibn Khaldun</a>, <a href="/wiki/Jonathan_Swift" title="Jonathan Swift">Jonathan Swift</a>, <a href="/wiki/David_Hume" title="David Hume">David Hume</a>, <a href="/wiki/Adam_Smith" title="Adam Smith">Adam Smith</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Alexander_Hamilton" title="Alexander Hamilton">Alexander Hamilton</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-153" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-153"><span>[</span>154<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=36" title="Edit section: Stopping the Equal Rights Amendment">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Stopping_the_Equal_Rights_Amendment">Stopping the Equal Rights Amendment</span></h3>
<p>Conservative women were mobilized in the late 1970s by <a href="/wiki/Phyllis_Schlafly" title="Phyllis Schlafly">Phyllis Schlafly</a> (1924– ) in an effort to stop ratification of the <a href="/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment" title="Equal Rights Amendment">Equal Rights Amendment</a> (ERA) to the U.S. Constitution. The ERA had seemed a noncontroversial effort to provide legal equality when it easily passed Congress in 1972 and quickly was ratified by 28 of the necessary 38 states. Schlafly denounced it as tilting the playing field against the traditional housewife in a power grab by anti-family feminists on the left. She warned it would mean women would be drafted in the Army on the same basis as men. Through her <a href="/wiki/Eagle_Forum" title="Eagle Forum">Eagle Forum</a> she organized state-by-state to block further ratification, and to have states rescind their ratification. Congress extended the time needed, and a movement among feminists tried to boycott tourist cities in states that had not ratified (such as Chicago and New Orleans). It was to no avail. The ERA never became law and Schlafly became a major spokesperson for anti-feminism in the conservative movement.<sup id="cite_ref-154" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-154"><span>[</span>155<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=37" title="Edit section: 1980s: Reagan Era">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="1980s:_Reagan_Era">1980s: Reagan Era</span></h2>
<div class="thumb tleft">
<div class="thumbinner" style="width:202px;"><a href="/wiki/File:Official_Portrait_of_President_Reagan_1981.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/16/Official_Portrait_of_President_Reagan_1981.jpg/200px-Official_Portrait_of_President_Reagan_1981.jpg" width="200" height="250" class="thumbimage" /></a>
<div class="thumbcaption">
<div class="magnify"><a href="/wiki/File:Official_Portrait_of_President_Reagan_1981.jpg" class="internal" title="Enlarge"><img src="//bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.18/common/images/magnify-clip.png" width="15" height="11" alt="" /></a></div>
<a href="/wiki/Ronald_Reagan" title="Ronald Reagan">Ronald Reagan</a>.</div>
</div>
</div>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=38" title="Edit section: Conservative ascent">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Conservative_ascent">Conservative ascent</span></h3>
<p>In Tehran, Islamic militants released the hostages at the moment <a href="/wiki/Ronald_Reagan" title="Ronald Reagan">Ronald Reagan</a> was sworn in. With its victory in <a href="/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1980" title="United States presidential election, 1980">1980</a> the modern American conservative movement took power. Republicans took control of the Senate for the first time since 1954, and conservative principles dominated Reagan's economic and foreign policies, with <a href="/wiki/Supply_side_economics" title="Supply side economics" class="mw-redirect">supply side economics</a> and strict opposition to Soviet Communism defining the Administration's philosophy. Reagan's ideas were largely espoused and supported by the conservative <a href="/wiki/The_Heritage_Foundation" title="The Heritage Foundation">Heritage Foundation</a>, which grew dramatically in its influence during the Reagan years, extended to a second term by the <a href="/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1984" title="United States presidential election, 1984">1984 presidential election</a>, as Reagan and his senior aides looked to Heritage for policy guidance.</p>
<p>An icon of the American conservative movement, Reagan is credited by his supporters with transforming the politics of the United States, galvanizing the success of the Republican Party. He brought together a coalition of economic conservatives, who supported his <a href="/wiki/Supply_side_economics" title="Supply side economics" class="mw-redirect">supply side economics</a>; foreign policy conservatives, who favored his staunch opposition to <a href="/wiki/Communism" title="Communism">Communism</a> and the <a href="/wiki/Soviet_Union" title="Soviet Union">Soviet Union</a>; and social conservatives, who identified with his religious and social ideals. Reagan labeled the former <a href="/wiki/Soviet_Union" title="Soviet Union">Soviet Union</a> the "<a href="/wiki/Evil_empire" title="Evil empire">evil empire</a>." He was attacked by liberals at the time as a dangerous warmonger, but conservative historians assert that he decisively won the <a href="/wiki/Cold_War" title="Cold War">Cold War</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-155" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-155"><span>[</span>156<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>In defining conservatism, Reagan said: "If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals—if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is."<sup id="cite_ref-156" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-156"><span>[</span>157<span>]</span></a></sup> Reagan's views on government were influenced by <a href="/wiki/Thomas_Jefferson" title="Thomas Jefferson">Thomas Jefferson</a>, especially his hostility to strong central governments.<sup id="cite_ref-157" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-157"><span>[</span>158<span>]</span></a></sup> "We're still Jefferson's children," he declared in 1987. "Freedom is not created by Government, nor is it a gift from those in political power. It is, in fact, secured, more than anything else, by limitations placed on those in Government".<sup id="cite_ref-158" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-158"><span>[</span>159<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-159" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-159"><span>[</span>160<span>]</span></a></sup> Likewise he greatly admired and often quoted <a href="/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln" title="Abraham Lincoln">Abraham Lincoln</a><sup id="cite_ref-160" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-160"><span>[</span>161<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p><a href="/wiki/Supply_side_economics" title="Supply side economics" class="mw-redirect">Supply side economics</a> dominated the Reagan Era<sup id="cite_ref-biggov_conservatives_161-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-biggov_conservatives-161"><span>[</span>162<span>]</span></a></sup> During his eight years in office the national debt more than doubled, from $907 billion in 1980 to $2.6 trillion in 1988, and consumer prices rose by more than 50%.<sup id="cite_ref-162" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-162"><span>[</span>163<span>]</span></a></sup> But despite cuts in income tax rates, federal income tax revenues grew from $244 billion in 1980 to $467 billion in 1990.<sup id="cite_ref-163" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-163"><span>[</span>164<span>]</span></a></sup> The real median family income, which had declined during the previous administration, grew by about ten percent under Reagan. The period from 1981 to 1989 was among the most prosperous in American history, with 17 million new jobs created.<sup id="cite_ref-164" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-164"><span>[</span>165<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=39" title="Edit section: Since 1990">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Since_1990">Since 1990</span></h2>
<p>In 1992 many conservatives repudiated President Bush because he violated his promise, "Read My Lips: No New Taxes." He was defeated for reelection in 1992 in a three way race, with populist <a href="/wiki/Ross_Perot" title="Ross Perot">Ross Perot</a> attracting considerable support on the right. Democrat <a href="/wiki/Bill_Clinton" title="Bill Clinton">Bill Clinton</a> was stopped in his plan for government health care, and in 1994 the GOP made sweeping gains under the leadership of <a href="/wiki/Newt_Gingrich" title="Newt Gingrich">Newt Gingrich</a>, the first Republican to become Speaker in 40 years. Gingrich overplayed his hand by cutting off funding for the Federal government, allowing Clinton to regain momentum and win reelection in 1996. The "<a href="/wiki/Contract_with_America" title="Contract with America">Contract with America</a>" promised numerous reforms, but little was accomplished beyond the ending of major New Deal welfare programs. A national movement to impose <a href="/wiki/Term_limits" title="Term limits" class="mw-redirect">term limits</a> failed to reach Congress (because the Supreme Court ruled that a constitutional amendment was needed) but did transform politics in some states, especially California.</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=40" title="Edit section: George W. Bush">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="George_W._Bush">George W. Bush</span></h3>
<p>In an extremely close race <a href="/wiki/George_W._Bush" title="George W. Bush">George W. Bush</a> was <a href="/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2000#Results" title="United States presidential election, 2000">elected president in 2000</a> after a contested recount in Florida, and brought a new generation of conservative activists to power in Washington. Bush cut taxes in a 10-year plan that was renewed in late 2010, following major debate. Bush forged a bipartisan coalition to pass "<a href="/wiki/No_Child_Left_Behind" title="No Child Left Behind" class="mw-redirect">No Child Left Behind</a>", which for the first time imposed national standards on public schools. The <a href="/wiki/9-11_Attacks" title="9-11 Attacks" class="mw-redirect">9-11 Attacks</a> unified the nation in the <a href="/wiki/War_against_Terrorism" title="War against Terrorism" class="mw-redirect">War against Terrorism</a>, with invasions of Afghanistan in 2001 (which is still underway in 2012), and Iraq in 2003 (which ended in late 2011).</p>
<p>Bush won solid support from Republicans in Congress and from conservative voters in his <a href="/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2004" title="United States presidential election, 2004">reelection bid in 2004</a>. Exit polls in 2004 showed that 34% of the voters identified themselves as "conservatives" and they voted 84% for Bush. By contrast, 21% were "liberals," of whom 13% voted for Bush; 45% were "moderates" and they voted 45% for Bush. Almost the same pattern had appeared in the 2000 exit polls.<sup id="cite_ref-CNN_2004_Exit_Poll_165-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-CNN_2004_Exit_Poll-165"><span>[</span>166<span>]</span></a></sup> As the map demonstrates, Bush carried most rural counties. The exit polls show Bush won 57% of the rural vote, 52% of the suburban vote and 45% of the urban vote.<sup id="cite_ref-CNN_2004_Exit_Poll_165-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-CNN_2004_Exit_Poll-165"><span>[</span>166<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>When the financial system verged on total collapse in 2008, Bush pushed through large scale <a href="/wiki/Emergency_Economic_Stabilization_Act_of_2008" title="Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008">rescue packages</a> for banks and auto companies that some conservatives in Congress did not support.<sup id="cite_ref-166" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-166"><span>[</span>167<span>]</span></a></sup> Some noted conservatives, including <a href="/wiki/Richard_A._Viguerie" title="Richard A. Viguerie" class="mw-redirect">Richard A. Viguerie</a> and <a href="/wiki/William_F._Buckley,_Jr." title="William F. Buckley, Jr.">William F. Buckley, Jr.</a> concluded that Bush was not a conservative, neither in foreign policy nor in domestic economic policy.<sup id="cite_ref-167" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-167"><span>[</span>168<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-168" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-168"><span>[</span>169<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=41" title="Edit section: 2008 election">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="2008_election">2008 election</span></h3>
<div class="rellink relarticle mainarticle">Main article: <a href="/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2008" title="United States presidential election, 2008">United States presidential election, 2008</a></div>
<p>The Republican contest for the nomination in 2008 was a free-for-all, with Senator <a href="/wiki/John_McCain" title="John McCain">John McCain</a> the winner, facing the first African American US presidential candidate, <a href="/wiki/Barack_Obama" title="Barack Obama">Barack Obama</a>. McCain chose Alaska Governor <a href="/wiki/Sarah_Palin" title="Sarah Palin">Sarah Palin</a> as his running mate, and while greeted by the establishment of the GOP with initial skepticism, she electrified many conservatives and has become a major political force on the Right. The economic crisis of 2008 arguably doomed McCain. Congress had already shifted to the Left in 2006.<sup id="cite_ref-169" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-169"><span>[</span>170<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>In 2009–10 the GOP in Congress was unified in almost total opposition to the programs of the Democratic majority. They tried but failed to stop a $814 billion stimulus spending program, new regulations on Wall Street investment firms, and a bill to provide health insurance for all Americans. They did keep <a href="/wiki/Emissions_trading" title="Emissions trading">"cap and trade"</a> from coming to a vote, and vow to continue to work to convince Americans that burning fossil fuel does not cause <a href="/wiki/Global_warming" title="Global warming">Global warming</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-170" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-170"><span>[</span>171<span>]</span></a></sup> The slow growth of the economy in the first two years of the Obama administration has led Republicans to call for a return to tax cuts for the richest one percent and deregulation of the oil and banking industries as the best way to solve the financial crisis. Under heavy conservative attack, Obama's popularity steadily declined in his first year in office, then leveled off at about 50-50,<sup id="cite_ref-171" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-171"><span>[</span>172<span>]</span></a></sup> as some elements of his 2008 coalition slackened in their enthusiasm, especially young voters and independents. Many conservatives, especially in the <a href="/wiki/National_Review" title="National Review">National Review</a> circle, supported his foreign policy of a surge in Afghanistan, air raids to support the insurgents in Libya, and the war on terror, especially after he ordered the killing of <a href="/wiki/Osama_bin_Laden" title="Osama bin Laden">Osama bin Laden</a> in May, 2011.<sup id="cite_ref-172" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-172"><span>[</span>173<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-173" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-173"><span>[</span>174<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=42" title="Edit section: Tea Party">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Tea_Party">Tea Party</span></h3>
<div class="rellink relarticle mainarticle">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Tea_Party_movement" title="Tea Party movement">Tea Party movement</a></div>
<div class="thumb tright">
<div class="thumbinner" style="width:252px;"><a href="/wiki/File:Conservative_Gallup_8-10.svg" class="image"><img alt="" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/74/Conservative_Gallup_8-10.svg/250px-Conservative_Gallup_8-10.svg.png" width="250" height="155" class="thumbimage" /></a>
<div class="thumbcaption">
<div class="magnify"><a href="/wiki/File:Conservative_Gallup_8-10.svg" class="internal" title="Enlarge"><img src="//bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.18/common/images/magnify-clip.png" width="15" height="11" alt="" /></a></div>
Percent of self-identified conservatives, according to Gallup, August 2010. Darker states have more conservatives. (click image for details).</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>A new element of conservatism was the <a href="/wiki/Tea_Party_movement" title="Tea Party movement">Tea Party movement</a> of 2009–present, a <a href="/wiki/Right-wing_populism" title="Right-wing populism">populist</a> grass-roots movement comprising over 600 local units angry at the government and at both major parties.<sup id="cite_ref-174" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-174"><span>[</span>175<span>]</span></a></sup> Many units have promoted activism and <a href="/wiki/Tea_Party_protests" title="Tea Party protests">protests</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-175" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-175"><span>[</span>176<span>]</span></a></sup> The stated purpose of the movement has been to stop what it views as wasteful government spending, excessive taxation, and strangulation of the economy through regulatory bureaucracies. The Tea Party attracted national attention when it propelled Republican <a href="/wiki/Scott_Brown" title="Scott Brown">Scott Brown</a> to a stunning victory in Senate election for the Massachusetts seat held by the Kennedy brothers for nearly 60 years.<sup id="cite_ref-176" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-176"><span>[</span>177<span>]</span></a></sup> In 2010 Tea Party candidates upset establishment Republicans in several primaries, such as Alaska, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Nevada, New York, South Carolina, and Utah, giving a new momentum to the conservative cause in the 2010 elections, and boosting Sarah Palin's visibility. Rasmussen and Schoen (2010) conclude that "She is the symbolic leader of the movement, and more than anyone else has helped to shape it."<sup id="cite_ref-177" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-177"><span>[</span>178<span>]</span></a></sup> In the fall 2010 elections, the <i>New York Times</i> has identified 129 House candidates with significant Tea Party support, as well as 9 running for the Senate; all are Republicans, as the Tea Party has not been active among Democrats.<sup id="cite_ref-178" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-178"><span>[</span>179<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>House Republicans, optimistic about regaining control, announced "A Pledge to America" in September 2010. It called for permanent <a href="/wiki/Bush_tax_cuts" title="Bush tax cuts">extension of the Bush tax cuts</a>, including those on the wealthy; cancellation of $250 billion in unspent <a href="/wiki/American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act_of_2009" title="American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009">stimulus money</a>, and repeal of the <a href="/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act" title="Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act">Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act</a>, replacing it with conservative proposals, including limits on malpractice lawsuits.<sup id="cite_ref-179" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-179"><span>[</span>180<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>The Tea Party itself is a conglomerate of conservatives with diverse viewpoints including libertarians and social conservatives. Most Tea Party supporters self-identify as "angry at the government".<sup id="cite_ref-Salant1_180-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Salant1-180"><span>[</span>181<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-181" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-181"><span>[</span>182<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-WPangry_182-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-WPangry-182"><span>[</span>183<span>]</span></a></sup> One survey found that Tea Party supporters in particular distinguish themselves from general Republican attitudes on social issues such as <a href="/wiki/Same-sex_marriage" title="Same-sex marriage">gay marriage</a>, abortion and immigration, as well as global warming.<sup id="cite_ref-Zernike_183-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Zernike-183"><span>[</span>184<span>]</span></a></sup> However, discussion of abortion and gay rights has also been downplayed by Tea Party leadership.<sup id="cite_ref-184" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-184"><span>[</span>185<span>]</span></a></sup> In the lead up to the 2010 election, most Tea Party candidates have focused on federal spending and deficits, with little focus on foreign policy.<sup id="cite_ref-185" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-185"><span>[</span>186<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>Noting the lack of central organization or explicit spokesmen, Matthew Continetti of <i>The Weekly Standard</i> has said: "There is no single Tea Party. The name is an umbrella that encompasses many different groups. Under this umbrella, you’ll find everyone from the woolly fringe to Ron Paul supporters, from Americans for Prosperity to religious conservatives, independents, and citizens who never have been active in politics before. The umbrella is gigantic."<sup id="cite_ref-WeekSt_186-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-WeekSt-186"><span>[</span>187<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>Gallup Poll editors noted in 2010 that "in addition to conservatives being more enthusiastic than liberals about voting in this year’s election, their relative advantage on enthusiasm is much greater than we've seen in the recent past."<sup id="cite_ref-187" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-187"><span>[</span>188<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=43" title="Edit section: Types">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Types">Types</span></h2>
<table class="metadata plainlinks ambox ambox-content ambox-Refimprove" style="">
<tr>
<td class="mbox-image">
<div style="width: 52px;"><img alt="" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/99/Question_book-new.svg/50px-Question_book-new.svg.png" width="50" height="39" /></div>
</td>
<td class="mbox-text" style="">This section <b>needs additional <a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Inline_citations" title="Wikipedia:Citing sources">citations</a> for <a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability" title="Wikipedia:Verifiability">verification</a></b>. Please help <a class="external text" href="//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit">improve this article</a> by adding citations to <a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources" title="Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources">reliable sources</a>. Unsourced material may be <a href="/wiki/Template:Citation_needed" title="Template:Citation needed">challenged</a> and <a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Burden_of_evidence" title="Wikipedia:Verifiability">removed</a>. <small><i>(September 2010)</i></small></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>In the United States today, the word "<a href="/wiki/Conservative" title="Conservative" class="mw-redirect">conservative</a>" is often used very differently from the way the word was used in the past and still is used in many parts of the world. The Americans after 1776 rejected the core ideals of European conservatism, based on the landed aristocracy, the established church, and the powerful, prestigious army.</p>
<p><a href="/wiki/Barry_Goldwater" title="Barry Goldwater">Barry Goldwater</a> in the 1960s spoke for a "<a href="/wiki/Free_enterprise" title="Free enterprise" class="mw-redirect">free enterprise</a>" conservatism. <a href="/wiki/Jerry_Falwell" title="Jerry Falwell">Jerry Falwell</a> in the 1980s preached traditional moral and religious social values. It was Reagan's challenge to form these groups into an electoral coalition.<sup class="Template-Fact" style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed" title="Wikipedia:Citation needed"><span title="This claim needs references to reliable sources from September 2010">citation needed</span></a></i>]</sup></p>
<p>In the 21st century U.S., some of the groups calling themselves "conservative" include:</p>
<ul>
<li><b><a href="/wiki/Traditionalist_conservatism" title="Traditionalist conservatism">Traditionalist conservatism</a></b>—Opposition to rapid change in governmental and societal institutions. This kind of conservatism is anti-ideological insofar as it emphasizes means (slow change) over ends (any particular form of government). To the traditionalist, whether one arrives at a right- or left-wing government is less important than whether change is effected through rule of law rather than through revolution and sudden innovation.</li>
<li><b>Christian conservatism</b>—Conservative Christians are primarily interested in <a href="/wiki/Family_values" title="Family values">family values</a>. Typical positions include the view that the United States was founded as a <a href="/wiki/Christian_nation" title="Christian nation" class="mw-redirect">Christian nation</a>, that <a href="/wiki/Abortion_debate" title="Abortion debate">abortion</a> is wrong, that there should be <a href="/wiki/School_prayer" title="School prayer">prayer in state schools</a>, and that marriage should be defined as between one man and one woman and not between two members of the same sex. Many attack the profanity and sexuality in the media and movies.</li>
<li><b><a href="/wiki/Limited_government" title="Limited government">Limited government</a> conservatism</b>—Limited government conservatives look for a decreased role of the federal government. They follow <a href="/wiki/Thomas_Jefferson" title="Thomas Jefferson">Thomas Jefferson</a> and <a href="/wiki/James_Madison" title="James Madison">James Madison</a> in their suspicion of a powerful federal government.</li>
<li><b><a href="/wiki/Neoconservatism" title="Neoconservatism">Neoconservatism</a></b>—A modern form of conservatism that supports a more assertive, <a href="/wiki/Interventionism_(politics)" title="Interventionism (politics)">interventionist</a> foreign policy, aimed at promoting <a href="/wiki/Democracy" title="Democracy">democracy</a> abroad. It is tolerant of an activist government at home, but is focused mostly on international affairs. Neoconservatism was first described by a group of disaffected liberals, and thus <a href="/wiki/Irving_Kristol" title="Irving Kristol">Irving Kristol</a>, usually credited as its intellectual progenitor, defined a <i>neoconservative</i> as "a liberal who was mugged by reality." Although originally regarded as an approach to domestic policy (the founding instrument of the movement, Kristol's <i><a href="/wiki/The_Public_Interest" title="The Public Interest">The Public Interest</a></i> periodical, did not even cover foreign affairs), through the influence of figures like <a href="/wiki/Dick_Cheney" title="Dick Cheney">Dick Cheney</a>, <a href="/wiki/Robert_Kagan" title="Robert Kagan">Robert Kagan</a>, <a href="/wiki/Richard_Perle" title="Richard Perle">Richard Perle</a>, <a href="/wiki/Kenneth_Adelman" title="Kenneth Adelman">Kenneth Adelman</a> and (Irving's son) <a href="/wiki/Bill_Kristol" title="Bill Kristol" class="mw-redirect">Bill Kristol</a>, it has become most famous for its association with the foreign policy of the <a href="/wiki/George_W._Bush" title="George W. Bush">George W. Bush</a> administration. Many of the nation's most prominent and influential conservatives during the two terms of the Bush administration were considered "neoconservative" in their ideological orientation.<sup id="cite_ref-188" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-188"><span>[</span>189<span>]</span></a></sup></li>
<li><b><a href="/wiki/Paleoconservatism" title="Paleoconservatism">Paleoconservatism</a></b>—Arising in the 1980s in reaction to neoconservatism, stresses tradition, especially <a href="/wiki/Christianity" title="Christianity">Christian</a> tradition and the importance to society of the traditional family. Some, <a href="/wiki/Samuel_P._Huntington" title="Samuel P. Huntington">Samuel P. Huntington</a> for example, argue that <a href="/wiki/Multiracial" title="Multiracial">multiracial</a>, multi-ethnic, and egalitarian states are inherently unstable.<sup id="cite_ref-189" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-189"><span>[</span>190<span>]</span></a></sup> Paleoconservatives are generally <a href="/wiki/Isolationist" title="Isolationist" class="mw-redirect">isolationist</a>, and suspicious of foreign influence. The magazines <i><a href="/wiki/Chronicles_(magazine)" title="Chronicles (magazine)">Chronicles</a></i> and <i><a href="/wiki/The_American_Conservative" title="The American Conservative">The American Conservative</a></i> are generally considered to be paleoconservative in nature.</li>
<li><b><a href="/wiki/Libertarian_conservatism" title="Libertarian conservatism">Libertarian conservatism</a></b> – A <a href="/wiki/Fusionism_(politics)" title="Fusionism (politics)" class="mw-redirect">fusion</a> with libertarianism, this type emphasizes a strict interpretation of the <a href="/wiki/United_States_Constitution" title="United States Constitution">Constitution</a>, particularly with regard to <a href="/wiki/Federalism_in_the_United_States" title="Federalism in the United States">federal power</a>. Libertarian conservatism is constituted by a broad, sometimes conflicted, coalition including pro-business social moderates, those favoring more rigid enforcement of <a href="/wiki/States%27_rights" title="States' rights">states' rights</a>, individual liberty activists, and many of those who place their socially liberal ideology ahead of their fiscal beliefs. This mode of thinking tends to espouse <i><a href="/wiki/Laissez-faire" title="Laissez-faire">laissez-faire</a></i> economics and a critical view of the federal government. Libertarian conservatives' emphasis on personal freedom often leads them to have social positions contrary to those of social conservatives. The <a href="/wiki/Libertarianism" title="Libertarianism">libertarian</a> branch of conservatism may have similar disputes that isolationist paleoconservatives would with neoconservatives. However, libertarian conservatives may be more militarily <a href="/wiki/Interventionism_(politics)" title="Interventionism (politics)">interventionist</a> or support a greater degree of <a href="/wiki/Peace_through_strength" title="Peace through strength">military strength</a> than other libertarians. Contrarily, a strong preference for local government puts libertarian conservatives in frequent opposition to <a href="/wiki/United_Nations" title="United Nations">international government</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=44" title="Edit section: Ideology and political philosophy">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Ideology_and_political_philosophy">Ideology and political philosophy</span></h3>
<p>Classical conservatives tend to be anti-ideological, and some would even say anti-philosophical,<sup id="cite_ref-190" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-190"><span>[</span>191<span>]</span></a></sup> promoting rather, as <a href="/wiki/Russell_Kirk" title="Russell Kirk">Russell Kirk</a> explains, a steady flow of "prescription and prejudice". Kirk's use of the word "prejudice" here is not intended to carry its contemporary pejorative connotation: a conservative himself, he believes that the inherited wisdom of the ages may be a better guide than apparently rational individual judgment.</p>
<p>In contrast to classical conservatism, <i>social conservatism</i> and <i>fiscal conservatism</i> are concerned with consequences.</p>
<p>There are two overlapping subgroups of social conservatives—the traditional and the religious. Traditional conservatives strongly support traditional codes of conduct, especially those they feel are threatened by social change. For example, traditional conservatives may oppose the use of female soldiers in combat. Religious conservatives focus on conducting society as prescribed by a religious authority or code. In the United States this translates into taking hard-line stances on moral issues, such as opposition to <a href="/wiki/Abortion" title="Abortion">abortion</a> and <a href="/wiki/Homosexuality" title="Homosexuality">homosexuality</a>. Religious conservatives often assert that "America is a Christian nation" and favor laws that enforce Christian morality.</p>
<p>Fiscal conservatives support limited government, limited taxation, and a balanced budget. They argue that low taxes produce more jobs and wealth for everyone, and also that, as President Grover Cleveland said, "unnecessary taxation is unjust taxation".<sup id="cite_ref-191" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-191"><span>[</span>192<span>]</span></a></sup> A recent movement against the inheritance tax labels such a tax as a <a href="/wiki/Death_tax" title="Death tax" class="mw-redirect">death tax</a>. Fiscal conservatives often argue that competition in the free market is more effective than the regulation of industry. Some make exceptions in the case of trusts or monopolies. Others, libertarians and followers of <a href="/wiki/Ludwig_von_Mises" title="Ludwig von Mises">Ludwig von Mises</a>, believe all government intervention in the economy is wasteful, corrupt, and immoral. More moderate fiscal conservatives argue that "free market economics" is the most efficient way to promote economic growth: they support it not based on some moral principle, but pragmatically, because they hold that it just "works."</p>
<p>Most modern American fiscal conservatives accept some social spending programs not specifically delineated in the Constitution. As such, fiscal conservatism today exists somewhere between classical conservatism and contemporary consequentialist political philosophies.</p>
<p>Throughout much of the 20th century, one of the primary forces uniting the occasionally disparate strands of conservatism, and uniting conservatives with their liberal and socialist opponents, was opposition to communism, which was seen not only as an enemy of the traditional order, but also the enemy of Western freedom and democracy. Thus it was the British Labour government—which embraced socialism—that pushed the Truman administration in 1945–47 to take a strong stand against Soviet Communism.<sup id="cite_ref-192" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-192"><span>[</span>193<span>]</span></a></sup> In the 1980s, the United States government spent billions of dollars arming and supporting Islamic terrorists, because these terrorists were fighting communists.<sup id="cite_ref-193" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-193"><span>[</span>194<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=45" title="Edit section: Social conservatism and tradition">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Social_conservatism_and_tradition">Social conservatism and tradition</span></h3>
<div class="rellink relarticle mainarticle">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Social_conservatism_in_the_United_States" title="Social conservatism in the United States">Social conservatism in the United States</a></div>
<p><a href="/wiki/Social_conservatism" title="Social conservatism">Social conservatism</a> in the United States is the defense of traditional social norms and Judeo-Christian values. Typically rooted in religion, modern cultural conservatives, in contrast to "small-government" conservatives and "states-rights" advocates, increasingly turn to the federal government to overrule the states in order to reverse state laws they find unacceptable, such as laws allowing gay marriage or restricting gun ownership.</p>
<p>Social conservatives tend to strongly identify with American nationalism and patriotism. They often denounce anti-war protesters and hail the police and the military. They hold that military institutions embody core values such as honor, duty, courage, loyalty, and a willingness on the part of the individual to make sacrifices for the good of the country.</p>
<p>While some conservatives denounce judges they consider too liberal, many want to use the federal courts to fight against the health care law of 2010 and to overrule laws legalizing <a href="/wiki/Legal_issues_of_cannabis" title="Legal issues of cannabis" class="mw-redirect">access to marijuana</a> or <a href="/wiki/Euthanasia" title="Euthanasia">assisted suicide</a>.</p>
<p><a href="/wiki/Richard_Hofstadter" title="Richard Hofstadter">Richard Hofstadter</a> in 1966 claimed that opposition to conservatism has been common among intellectuals since about 1890.<sup id="cite_ref-194" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-194"><span>[</span>195<span>]</span></a></sup> In the 1920s, religious <a href="/wiki/Fundamentalists" title="Fundamentalists" class="mw-redirect">fundamentalists</a> including <a href="/wiki/William_Bell_Riley" title="William Bell Riley">William Bell Riley</a> and <a href="/wiki/William_Jennings_Bryan" title="William Jennings Bryan">William Jennings Bryan</a> (a liberal Democrat) led the battle against <a href="/wiki/Darwinism" title="Darwinism">Darwinism</a> and <a href="/wiki/Evolution" title="Evolution">evolution</a>, a battle which fundamentalists are still fighting today. More recently, conservative anti-intellectualism has taken the form of attacks on elites, experts, scientists, public schools and universities.<sup id="cite_ref-195" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-195"><span>[</span>196<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>The <a href="/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)" title="Republican Party (United States)">Republican Party</a> is the largest political party with some socially conservative ideals incorporated into its platform.<sup class="Template-Fact" style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed" title="Wikipedia:Citation needed"><span title="This claim needs references to reliable sources from November 2011">citation needed</span></a></i>]</sup></p>
<p>Social conservatives are strongest in the South, and in recent years played a major role in the political coalitions of <a href="/wiki/Ronald_Reagan" title="Ronald Reagan">Ronald Reagan</a>, <a href="/wiki/George_W._Bush" title="George W. Bush">George W. Bush</a> and <a href="/wiki/Sarah_Palin" title="Sarah Palin">Sarah Palin</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-196" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-196"><span>[</span>197<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=46" title="Edit section: Fiscal conservatism">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Fiscal_conservatism">Fiscal conservatism</span></h3>
<div class="rellink relarticle mainarticle">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Fiscal_conservatism" title="Fiscal conservatism">Fiscal conservatism</a></div>
<p>Fiscal conservatism is the economic and political policy that advocates restraint of governmental taxation and expenditures. Fiscal conservatives since the 19th century have argued that debt is a device to corrupt politics; they argue that big spending ruins the morals of the people, and that a national debt creates a dangerous class of speculators. The argument in favor of <a href="/wiki/Balanced_budgets" title="Balanced budgets" class="mw-redirect">balanced budgets</a> is often coupled with a belief that government welfare programs should be narrowly tailored and that tax rates should be low, which implies relatively small government institutions.</p>
<p>This belief in small government combines with fiscal conservatism to produce a broader <i>economic liberalism</i>, which wishes to minimize government intervention in the economy or implement <i><a href="/wiki/Laissez-faire" title="Laissez-faire">laissez-faire</a></i> policies. This <i>economic liberalism</i> borrows from two schools of thought: the classical liberals' pragmatism and the libertarian's notion of "rights." The classical liberal maintains that free markets work best, while the libertarian contends that free markets are the only ethical markets.</p>
<p>The economic philosophy of conservatives in the United States tends to be more liberal allowing for more <a href="/wiki/Economic_freedom" title="Economic freedom">economic freedom</a>. <i><a href="/wiki/Economic_liberalism" title="Economic liberalism">Economic liberalism</a></i> can go well beyond <i>fiscal conservatism's</i> concern for fiscal prudence, to a belief or principle that it is not prudent for governments to intervene in markets. It is also, sometimes, extended to a broader "<a href="/wiki/Minarchism" title="Minarchism">small government</a>" philosophy. Economic liberalism is associated with <a href="/wiki/Free-market" title="Free-market" class="mw-redirect">free-market</a>, or laissez-faire economics.</p>
<p>Economic liberalism, insofar as it is <i>ideological</i>, owes its creation to the "<a href="/wiki/Classical_liberal" title="Classical liberal" class="mw-redirect">classical liberal</a>" tradition, in the vein of <a href="/wiki/Adam_Smith" title="Adam Smith">Adam Smith</a>, <a href="/wiki/Friedrich_A._Hayek" title="Friedrich A. Hayek" class="mw-redirect">Friedrich A. Hayek</a>, <a href="/wiki/Milton_Friedman" title="Milton Friedman">Milton Friedman</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Ludwig_von_Mises" title="Ludwig von Mises">Ludwig von Mises</a>.</p>
<p><i>Classical liberals</i> and <i>libertarians</i> support free markets on moral, ideological grounds: principles of individual liberty morally dictate support for free markets. Supporters of the moral grounds for free markets include <a href="/wiki/Ayn_Rand" title="Ayn Rand">Ayn Rand</a> and <a href="/wiki/Ludwig_von_Mises" title="Ludwig von Mises">Ludwig von Mises</a>. The liberal tradition is suspicious of government authority, and prefers individual choice, and hence tends to see capitalist economics as the preferable means of achieving economic ends.</p>
<p>Modern conservatives, on the other hand, derive support for free markets from practical grounds. Free markets, they argue, are the most productive markets. Thus the modern conservative supports free markets not out of necessity, but out of expedience. The support is not moral or ideological, but driven on the Burkean notion of prescription: what works best is what is right.</p>
<p>Another reason why conservatives support a smaller role for the government in the economy is the belief in the importance of the <a href="/wiki/Civil_society" title="Civil society">civil society</a>. As noted by <a href="/wiki/Alexis_de_Tocqueville" title="Alexis de Tocqueville">Alexis de Tocqueville</a>, there is a belief that a bigger role of the government in the economy will make people feel less responsible for the society. These responsibilities would then need to be taken over by the government, requiring higher taxes. In his book <a href="/wiki/Democracy_in_America" title="Democracy in America">Democracy in America</a>, De Tocqueville describes this as "soft oppression."</p>
<p>While classical liberals and modern conservatives reached free markets through different means historically, to-date the lines have blurred. Rarely will a politician claim that free markets are "simply more productive" or "simply the right thing to do" but a combination of both. This blurring is very much a product of the merging of the classical liberal and modern conservative positions under the "umbrella" of the conservative movement.</p>
<p>The archetypal free-market conservative administrations of the late 20th century—the <a href="/wiki/Margaret_Thatcher" title="Margaret Thatcher">Margaret Thatcher</a> government in Britain and the <a href="/wiki/Ronald_Reagan" title="Ronald Reagan">Ronald Reagan</a> administration in the U.S. – both held the unfettered operation of the market to be the cornerstone of contemporary modern conservatism (this philosophy is called <a href="/wiki/Neoliberalism" title="Neoliberalism">neoliberalism</a> by critics on the left). To that end, Thatcher privatized industries and public housing and Reagan cut the maximum capital gains tax from 28% to 20%, though in his second term he agreed to raise it back up to 28%. He wanted to increase defense spending and achieved that; liberal Democrats blocked his efforts to cut domestic spending.<sup id="cite_ref-197" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-197"><span>[</span>198<span>]</span></a></sup> Reagan did not control the rapid increase in federal government spending, or reduce the deficit, but his record looks better when expressed as a percent of the gross domestic product. Federal revenues as a percent of the GDP fell from 19.6% in 1981 when Reagan took office to 18.3% in 1989 when he left. Federal spending fell slightly from 22.2% of the GDP to 21.2%. This contrasts with statistics from 2004, when government spending was rising more rapidly than it had in decades.<sup id="cite_ref-198" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-198"><span>[</span>199<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=47" title="Edit section: Electoral politics">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Electoral_politics">Electoral politics</span></h2>
<p>In the United States, the <a href="/wiki/History_of_the_Republican_Party_(United_States)" title="History of the Republican Party (United States)" class="mw-redirect">Republican Party</a> has been the party of conservatism since the 1890s, although there was a strong Eastern liberal wing. Since 1964 the conservatives largely took control. Meanwhile the conservative wing of the <a href="/wiki/History_of_the_Democratic_Party_(United_States)" title="History of the Democratic Party (United States)" class="mw-redirect">Democratic Party</a>, based in the South and strongly opposed to <a href="/wiki/Civil_Rights" title="Civil Rights" class="mw-redirect">Civil Rights</a>, grew weaker. The most dramatic realignment took place within the white South, which moved from 3–1 Democratic to 3–1 Republican between 1960 and 2000.</p>
<p>In addition, some American libertarians, in the <a href="/wiki/Libertarian_Party_(United_States)" title="Libertarian Party (United States)">Libertarian Party</a> and even some in the Republican Party, see themselves as conservative, even though they advocate significant economic and social changes – for instance, further dismantling the <a href="/wiki/Welfare_(financial_aid)" title="Welfare (financial aid)" class="mw-redirect">welfare system</a> or liberalizing drug policy. They see these as conservative policies because they conform to the spirit of individual liberty that they consider to be a traditional American value. However, many Libertarian think-tanks such as the <a href="/wiki/Cato_Institute" title="Cato Institute">Cato Institute</a>, and Libertarian intellectuals such as <a href="/wiki/David_Boaz" title="David Boaz">David Boaz</a> describe Libertarianism as being "socially liberal and fiscally conservative." <sup id="cite_ref-Moseley_199-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Moseley-199"><span>[</span>200<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-200" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-200"><span>[</span>201<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>On the other end of the scale, some Americans see themselves as conservative while not being supporters of free market policies. These people generally favor <a href="/wiki/Protectionist" title="Protectionist" class="mw-redirect">protectionist</a> trade policies and government intervention in the market to preserve American jobs. Many of these conservatives were originally supporters of <a href="/wiki/Neoliberalism" title="Neoliberalism">neoliberalism</a><sup id="cite_ref-201" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-201"><span>[</span>202<span>]</span></a></sup> who changed their stance after perceiving that countries such as <a href="/wiki/China" title="China">China</a> were benefiting from that system at the expense of American production. However, despite their support for protectionism, they still tend to favor other elements of free market philosophy, such as low taxes, limited government and balanced budgets.</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=48" title="Edit section: Geography">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Geography">Geography</span></h3>
<p>Geographically the <a href="/wiki/Southern_United_States" title="Southern United States">South</a>, the <a href="/wiki/Great_Plains" title="Great Plains">Great Plains</a>, the <a href="/wiki/Mountain_States" title="Mountain States">Rocky Mountain states</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Alaska" title="Alaska">Alaska</a> are conservative strongholds. The "Left Coast" (California, Oregon, Washington) and the Northeast are liberal strongholds, albeit with some pockets of conservative strength. Conservatives are strongest in rural areas and, to a lesser extent, in the "<a href="/wiki/Commuter_town" title="Commuter town">exurbs</a>" or <a href="/wiki/Suburbs" title="Suburbs" class="mw-redirect">suburbs</a>(however, liberal cities also tend to have Democratic suburbs). Voters in the urban cores of large metropolitan areas tend to be more liberal and Democratic. Thus, within each state, there is a division between urban, suburban, exurban, and rural areas.<sup id="cite_ref-202" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-202"><span>[</span>203<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-203" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-203"><span>[</span>204<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=49" title="Edit section: Other topics">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Other_topics">Other topics</span></h2>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=50" title="Edit section: Kirk's six canons of conservatism">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Kirk.27s_six_canons_of_conservatism">Kirk's six canons of conservatism</span></h3>
<p><a href="/wiki/Russell_Kirk" title="Russell Kirk">Russell Kirk</a> developed six "canons" of conservatism, which Gerald J. Russello described as follows:</p>
<ol>
<li>A belief in a transcendent order, which Kirk described variously as based in tradition, <a href="/wiki/Divine_revelation" title="Divine revelation" class="mw-redirect">divine revelation</a>, or <a href="/wiki/Natural_law" title="Natural law">natural law</a>;</li>
<li>An affection for the "variety and mystery" of human existence;</li>
<li>A conviction that society requires orders and classes that emphasize "natural" distinctions;</li>
<li>A belief that property and freedom are closely linked;</li>
<li>A faith in custom, convention, and prescription, and</li>
<li>A recognition that innovation must be tied to existing traditions and customs, which entails a respect for the political value of prudence.<sup id="cite_ref-204" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-204"><span>[</span>205<span>]</span></a></sup></li>
</ol>
<p>Kirk said that <a href="/wiki/Christianity" title="Christianity">Christianity</a> and <a href="/wiki/Western_culture" title="Western culture">Western Civilization</a> are "unimaginable apart from one another"<sup id="cite_ref-205" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-205"><span>[</span>206<span>]</span></a></sup> and that "all culture arises out of religion. When religious faith decays, culture must decline, though often seeming to flourish for a space after the religion which has nourished it has sunk into disbelief."<sup id="cite_ref-206" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-206"><span>[</span>207<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=51" title="Edit section: Courts">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Courts">Courts</span></h3>
<p>One stream of conservatism exemplified by <a href="/wiki/William_Howard_Taft" title="William Howard Taft">William Howard Taft</a> extols independent judges as experts in fairness and the final arbiters of the Constitution. In 1910 <a href="/wiki/Theodore_Roosevelt" title="Theodore Roosevelt">Theodore Roosevelt</a> broke with most of his lawyer friends and called for popular votes that could overturn unwelcome decisions by state courts. Taft denounced his old friend and rallied conservatives to defeat him for the 1912 GOP nomination. Taft and the conservative Republicans controlled the Supreme Court until the late 1930s.<sup id="cite_ref-207" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-207"><span>[</span>208<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-208" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-208"><span>[</span>209<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>President <a href="/wiki/Franklin_D._Roosevelt" title="Franklin D. Roosevelt">Franklin D. Roosevelt</a>, a liberal Democrat, did not attack the <a href="/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States" title="Supreme Court of the United States">Supreme Court</a> directly in 1937, but ignited a firestorm of protest by a proposal to add seven new justices. Conservative Democrats immediately broke with FDR, defeated his proposal, and built up the Conservative Coalition. While the liberals did take over the Court through replacements, they lost control of Congress. That is, the Court no longer overthrew liberal laws passed by Congress, but there were very few such laws that passed in 1937–60.<sup id="cite_ref-209" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-209"><span>[</span>210<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>A recent variant of conservatism condemns "judicial activism"; that is, judges using their decisions to control policy, along the lines of the <a href="/wiki/Warren_Court" title="Warren Court">Warren Court</a> in the 1960s. It came under conservative attack for decisions regarding redistricting, desegregation, and the rights of those accused of crimes. This position goes back to Jefferson's vehement attacks on federal judges and to <a href="/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln" title="Abraham Lincoln">Abraham Lincoln</a>'s attacks on the <a href="/wiki/Dred_Scott" title="Dred Scott">Dred Scott</a> decision of 1857.<sup id="cite_ref-210" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-210"><span>[</span>211<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-211" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-211"><span>[</span>212<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h4><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=52" title="Edit section: Originalism">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Originalism">Originalism</span></h4>
<div class="rellink relarticle mainarticle">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Originalism" title="Originalism">Originalism</a></div>
<p>A more recent variant that emerged in the 1970s is "<a href="/wiki/Originalism" title="Originalism">originalism</a>", the assertion that the <a href="/wiki/United_States_Constitution" title="United States Constitution">United States Constitution</a> should be interpreted to the maximum extent possible in the light of what it meant when it was adopted. Originalism should not be confused with a similar conservative ideology, <a href="/wiki/Strict_constructionism" title="Strict constructionism">strict constructionism</a>, which deals with the interpretation of the Constitution as written, but not necessarily within the context of the time when it was adopted. In modern times, originalism has been advocated by Supreme Court justice <a href="/wiki/Antonin_Scalia" title="Antonin Scalia">Antonin Scalia</a>, former federal judge <a href="/wiki/Robert_Bork" title="Robert Bork">Robert Bork</a> and other conservative jurists.<sup id="cite_ref-212" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-212"><span>[</span>213<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=53" title="Edit section: Environmentalism">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Environmentalism">Environmentalism</span></h3>
<p>Conservatives have supported <a href="/wiki/Conservation_movement" title="Conservation movement">conservation</a> efforts, from the protection of the <a href="/wiki/Yosemite_Valley" title="Yosemite Valley">Yosemite Valley</a>, to the creation of the <a href="/wiki/Environmental_Protection_Agency" title="Environmental Protection Agency" class="mw-redirect">Environmental Protection Agency</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-213" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-213"><span>[</span>214<span>]</span></a></sup> However, it has been noted that Conservatives have opposed <a href="/wiki/Environmentalism" title="Environmentalism">environmentalism</a>; with environmentalists often ridiculed as "tree huggers", and in the 1980s President Reagan appointing Interior Secretary <a href="/wiki/James_G._Watt" title="James G. Watt">James G. Watt</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-214" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-214"><span>[</span>215<span>]</span></a></sup> Conservative think tanks in the 1990s challenged the concept of <a href="/wiki/Global_warming_controversy" title="Global warming controversy">global warming</a>; scientific evidence was challenged, benefits of global warming were stated, and warned that proposed remedies would do more harm than good.<sup id="cite_ref-215" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-215"><span>[</span>216<span>]</span></a></sup> The concept of <a href="/wiki/Anthropogenic_global_warming" title="Anthropogenic global warming" class="mw-redirect">anthropogenic global warming</a> continues to be an ongoing debate within Conservatives in the United States.</p>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=54" title="Edit section: Semantics, language, and media">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Semantics.2C_language.2C_and_media">Semantics, language, and media</span></h3>
<h4><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=55" title="Edit section: Vocabulary">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Vocabulary">Vocabulary</span></h4>
<h5><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=56" title="Edit section: Democrat Party">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Democrat_Party">Democrat Party</span></h5>
<div class="rellink relarticle mainarticle">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Democrat_Party_(phrase)" title="Democrat Party (phrase)">Democrat Party (phrase)</a></div>
<p>In the late 20th century conservatives found new ways to use language and the media to support their goals and to shape the vocabulary of political discourse. Thus the use of "Democrat" as an adjective, as in "Democrat Party" was used first in 1940 by Republicans to criticize large urban Democratic machines run in authoritarian non-democratic fashion. Republican leader <a href="/wiki/Harold_Stassen" title="Harold Stassen">Harold Stassen</a> stated in 1940, "I emphasized that the party controlled in large measure at that time by Hague in New Jersey, Pendergast in Missouri and Kelly Nash in Chicago should not be called a 'Democratic Party.' It should be called the 'Democrat party.'"<sup id="cite_ref-216" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-216"><span>[</span>217<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>In 1947 Senator <a href="/wiki/Robert_Taft" title="Robert Taft">Robert A. Taft</a> said, "Nor can we expect any other policy from any Democrat Party or any Democrat President under present day conditions. They cannot possibly win an election solely through the support of the <a href="/wiki/Solid_South" title="Solid South">solid South</a>, and yet their political strategists believe the Southern Democrat Party will not break away no matter how radical the allies imposed upon it".<sup id="cite_ref-217" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-217"><span>[</span>218<span>]</span></a></sup> The use of "Democrat" as an adjective is standard practice in Republican national platforms (since 1948), and was a standard practice in the White House in 2001–2008, for press releases and speeches.</p>
<h5><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=57" title="Edit section: Socialism">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Socialism">Socialism</span></h5>
<p>Since the late 19th century "socialism" (or "creeping socialism") is often used as an epithet by conservatives to attack liberal spending or tax programs that enlarge the role of the government. In this sense it has little to do with government ownership of the means of production, or the various Socialist parties. Thus <a href="/wiki/William_Allen_White" title="William Allen White">William Allen White</a> attacked presidential candidate <a href="/wiki/William_Jennings_Bryan" title="William Jennings Bryan">William Jennings Bryan</a> in 1896 by warning that, "The election will sustain Americanism or it will plant Socialism."<sup id="cite_ref-218" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-218"><span>[</span>219<span>]</span></a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-219" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-219"><span>[</span>220<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h4><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=58" title="Edit section: Broadcast media">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Broadcast_media">Broadcast media</span></h4>
<p>Conservatives gained a major new communications medium with the resurgence of <a href="/wiki/Talk_radio" title="Talk radio">talk radio</a> in the late 1980s. <a href="/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh" title="Rush Limbaugh">Rush Limbaugh</a> proved there was a huge nationwide audience for specific and heated discussions of current events from a conservative viewpoint. Other major hosts who describe themselves as conservative include: <a href="/wiki/Michael_Peroutka" title="Michael Peroutka">Michael Peroutka</a>, <a href="/wiki/Jim_Quinn" title="Jim Quinn">Jim Quinn</a>, <a href="/wiki/Dennis_Miller" title="Dennis Miller">Dennis Miller</a>, <a href="/wiki/Ben_Ferguson" title="Ben Ferguson">Ben Ferguson</a>, <a href="/wiki/William_Bennett" title="William Bennett">William Bennett</a>, <a href="/wiki/Lars_Larson" title="Lars Larson">Lars Larson</a>, <a href="/wiki/Sean_Hannity" title="Sean Hannity">Sean Hannity</a>, <a href="/wiki/G._Gordon_Liddy" title="G. Gordon Liddy">G. Gordon Liddy</a>, <a href="/wiki/Laura_Ingraham" title="Laura Ingraham">Laura Ingraham</a>, <a href="/wiki/Mike_Church" title="Mike Church">Mike Church</a>, <a href="/wiki/Glenn_Beck" title="Glenn Beck">Glenn Beck</a>, <a href="/wiki/Mark_Levin" title="Mark Levin">Mark Levin</a>, <a href="/wiki/Michael_Savage_(commentator)" title="Michael Savage (commentator)" class="mw-redirect">Michael Savage</a>, <a href="/wiki/Kim_Peterson" title="Kim Peterson">Kim Peterson</a>, <a href="/wiki/Michael_Reagan" title="Michael Reagan">Michael Reagan</a>, <a href="/wiki/Jason_Lewis_(radio_host)" title="Jason Lewis (radio host)">Jason Lewis</a> and <a href="/wiki/Ken_Hamblin" title="Ken Hamblin">Ken Hamblin</a>.<sup class="Template-Fact" style="white-space:nowrap;">[<i><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed" title="Wikipedia:Citation needed"><span title="This claim needs references to reliable sources from June 2010">citation needed</span></a></i>]</sup> The <a href="/wiki/Salem_Radio_Network" title="Salem Radio Network">Salem Radio Network</a> syndicates a group of religiously oriented Republican activists, including <a href="/wiki/Evangelical_Christian" title="Evangelical Christian" class="mw-redirect">Evangelical Christian</a> <a href="/wiki/Hugh_Hewitt" title="Hugh Hewitt">Hugh Hewitt</a>, and Jewish conservatives <a href="/wiki/Dennis_Prager" title="Dennis Prager">Dennis Prager</a> and <a href="/wiki/Michael_Medved" title="Michael Medved">Michael Medved</a>. One popular Jewish conservative, <a href="/wiki/Laura_Schlessinger" title="Laura Schlessinger">Laura Schlessinger</a>, offers parental and personal advice, but is outspoken on social and political issues. In 2011, the largest weekly audiences for talk radio were 15 million for Limbaugh and 14 million for Hannity, with about nine million each for Glenn Beck, Michael Savage and Mark Levin. The audiences overlap, depending on how many each listener dials into every week.<sup id="cite_ref-220" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-220"><span>[</span>221<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p><a href="/wiki/Fox_News_Channel" title="Fox News Channel">Fox News</a> features conservative hosts such as <a href="/wiki/Bill_O%27Reilly_(commentator)" title="Bill O'Reilly (commentator)" class="mw-redirect">Bill O'Reilly</a>, <a href="/wiki/Sean_Hannity" title="Sean Hannity">Sean Hannity</a>, <a href="/wiki/Greta_Van_Susteren" title="Greta Van Susteren">Greta Van Susteren</a>, <a href="/wiki/Mike_Huckabee" title="Mike Huckabee">Mike Huckabee</a>, <a href="/wiki/Shepard_Smith" title="Shepard Smith">Shepard Smith</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Neil_Cavuto" title="Neil Cavuto">Neil Cavuto</a>.<sup id="cite_ref-221" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-221"><span>[</span>222<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<p>Conservative critic <a href="/wiki/David_Frum" title="David Frum">David Frum</a> has argued that the influence of conservative talk radio and Fox News has harmed American conservatism, turning it from "a political philosophy into a market segment" for extremism and conflict making "for bad politics but great TV." Backed by the conservative book-publishing industry and think tanks, talk radio and Fox News,</p>
<blockquote>
<p>have built a whole alternative knowledge system, with its own facts, its own history, its own laws of economics. Outside this alternative reality, the United States is a country dominated by a strong <a href="/wiki/Christian" title="Christian">Christian</a> religiosity. Within it, Christians are a persecuted minority. Outside the system, President Obama—whatever his policy ­errors—is a figure of imposing intellect and dignity. Within the system, he’s a pitiful nothing, unable to speak without a teleprompter, an <a href="/wiki/Affirmative-action" title="Affirmative-action" class="mw-redirect">affirmative-action</a> ­phony doomed to inevitable defeat. Outside the system, social scientists worry that the U.S. is hardening into one of the most rigid <a href="/wiki/Social_class" title="Social class">class</a> societies in the <a href="/wiki/Western_world" title="Western world">Western world</a>, in which the children of the poor have less chance of escape than in France, Germany, or even England. Inside the system, the U.S. remains (to borrow the words of Senator <a href="/wiki/Marco_Rubio" title="Marco Rubio">Marco Rubio</a>) “the only place in the world where it doesn’t matter who your parents were or where you came from.”<sup id="cite_ref-222" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-222"><span>[</span>223<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
</blockquote>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=59" title="Edit section: Academic analysis">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Academic_analysis">Academic analysis</span></h3>
<p>Academic discussion of conservatism in the United States has been dominated by <i><a href="/wiki/American_exceptionalism" title="American exceptionalism">American exceptionalism</a></i>, the theory that British and European conservatism has little or no relevance to American traditions. This is in contrast to the view that Burkean conservatism has a set of universal principles which can be applied all societies.<sup id="cite_ref-223" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-223"><span>[</span>224<span>]</span></a></sup> According to political scientist <a href="/wiki/Louis_Hartz" title="Louis Hartz">Louis Hartz</a>, because the United States skipped the feudal stage of history, the American community was united by liberal principles, and the conflict between the "Whig" and "Democratic" parties were conflicts within a liberal framework.<sup id="cite_ref-224" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-224"><span>[</span>225<span>]</span></a></sup> In this view, what is called "conservatism" in America is not European conservatism (with its royalty, landowning aristocracy, elite officer corps, and established churches) but rather 19th century <a href="/wiki/Classical_liberalism" title="Classical liberalism">classical liberalism</a> with an emphasis on economic freedom and entrepreneurship.<sup id="cite_ref-225" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-225"><span>[</span>226<span>]</span></a></sup> Another view is found in Russell Kirk's <i>The Conservative Mind</i> who argued that the American Revolution was "a conservative reaction, in the English political tradition, against royal innovation".<sup id="cite_ref-Russell_Kirk_1953_p._6.2C_63_24-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Russell_Kirk_1953_p._6.2C_63-24"><span>[</span>25<span>]</span></a></sup> Kirk's theories were severely criticized by M. Morton Auerbach in <i>The Conservative Illusion</i>.<sup id="cite_ref-226" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-226"><span>[</span>227<span>]</span></a></sup> <a href="/wiki/Theodore_Adorno" title="Theodore Adorno" class="mw-redirect">Theodore Adorno</a> and <a href="/wiki/Richard_Hofstader" title="Richard Hofstader" class="mw-redirect">Richard Hofstader</a> referred to modern American conservatives as "pseudo-conservatives", because of their "dissatisfaction with American life, traditions and institutions" and because they had "little in common with the temperate and compromising spirit of true conservatism".<sup id="cite_ref-227" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-227"><span>[</span>228<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=60" title="Edit section: Thinkers and leaders">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Thinkers_and_leaders">Thinkers and leaders</span></h2>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=61" title="Edit section: Major American conservatives">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Major_American_conservatives">Major American conservatives</span></h3>
<h4><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=62" title="Edit section: Rossiter's giants">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Rossiter.27s_giants">Rossiter's giants</span></h4>
<p><a href="/wiki/Clinton_Rossiter" title="Clinton Rossiter">Clinton Rossiter</a>, a leading expert on American political history, published his history of <i>Conservatism in America</i> and also a summary article on "The Giants Of American Conservatism" in <i>American Heritage</i>.<sup id="cite_ref-228" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-228"><span>[</span>229<span>]</span></a></sup> His goal was to identify the "great men who did conservative deeds, thought conservative thoughts, practiced conservative virtues, and stood for conservative principles." To Rossiter, conservatism was defined by the rule of the upper class. He wrote, "The Right of these freewheeling decades was a genuine Right: it was led by the rich and well-placed; it was skeptical of popular government; it was opposed to all parties, unions, leagues, or other movements that sought to invade its positions of power and profit; it was politically, socially, and culturally anti-radical." His "giants of American conservatism" were: <a href="/wiki/John_Adams" title="John Adams">John Adams</a>, <a href="/wiki/Alexander_Hamilton" title="Alexander Hamilton">Alexander Hamilton</a>, <a href="/wiki/John_Marshall" title="John Marshall">John Marshall</a>, <a href="/wiki/Daniel_Webster" title="Daniel Webster">Daniel Webster</a>, <a href="/wiki/John_C._Calhoun" title="John C. Calhoun">John C. Calhoun</a>, <a href="/wiki/Elihu_Root" title="Elihu Root">Elihu Root</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Theodore_Roosevelt" title="Theodore Roosevelt">Theodore Roosevelt</a>. He added that Washington and Lincoln transcend the usual categories, but that conservatives "may argue with some conviction that Washington and Lincoln can also be added to his list."</p>
<p>Rossiter went to note the importance of other conservative leaders over the past two centuries. Among the fathers of the Constitution, which he calls "a triumph of conservative statesmanship", Rossiter said conservatives may "take special pride" in <a href="/wiki/James_Madison" title="James Madison">James Madison</a>, <a href="/wiki/James_Wilson" title="James Wilson">James Wilson</a>, <a href="/wiki/Roger_Sherman" title="Roger Sherman">Roger Sherman</a>, <a href="/wiki/John_Dickinson_(delegate)" title="John Dickinson (delegate)" class="mw-redirect">John Dickinson</a>, <a href="/wiki/Gouverneur_Morris" title="Gouverneur Morris">Gouverneur Morris</a> and the Pinckneys of South Carolina. For the early 19th century, Rossiter said the libertarians and constitutionalists who deserve the conservative spotlight for their fight against <a href="/wiki/Jacksonian_Democracy" title="Jacksonian Democracy" class="mw-redirect">Jacksonian Democracy</a> include <a href="/wiki/Joseph_Story" title="Joseph Story">Joseph Story</a> and <a href="/wiki/Josiah_Quincy_III" title="Josiah Quincy III">Josiah Quincy</a> in Massachusetts; Chancellor <a href="/wiki/James_Kent" title="James Kent">James Kent</a> in New York; <a href="/wiki/James_Madison" title="James Madison">James Madison</a>, <a href="/wiki/James_Monroe" title="James Monroe">James Monroe</a>, and <a href="/wiki/John_Randolph_of_Roanoke" title="John Randolph of Roanoke">John Randolph of Roanoke</a> in Virginia.</p>
<p>In the decades around 1900, Rossiter finds that <a href="/wiki/Grover_Cleveland" title="Grover Cleveland">Grover Cleveland</a>, <a href="/wiki/Elihu_Root" title="Elihu Root">Elihu Root</a>, <a href="/wiki/William_Howard_Taft" title="William Howard Taft">William Howard Taft</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Theodore_Roosevelt" title="Theodore Roosevelt">Theodore Roosevelt</a> "were most successful in shaping the old truths of conservatism to the new facts of industrialism and democracy."</p>
<p>Finally, he suggests that someday <a href="/wiki/Robert_A._Taft" title="Robert A. Taft" class="mw-redirect">Robert A. Taft</a>, <a href="/wiki/Charles_Evans_Hughes" title="Charles Evans Hughes">Charles Evans Hughes</a>, and <a href="/wiki/Dwight_D._Eisenhower" title="Dwight D. Eisenhower">Dwight D. Eisenhower</a> may be added to the list.</p>
<h4><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=63" title="Edit section: Prominent figures">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Prominent_figures">Prominent figures</span></h4>
<table class="metadata plainlinks ambox ambox-style" style="">
<tr>
<td class="mbox-image">
<div style="width: 52px;"><a href="/wiki/File:Text-x-generic.svg" class="image"><img alt="Text-x-generic.svg" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/20/Text-x-generic.svg/40px-Text-x-generic.svg.png" width="40" height="40" /></a></div>
</td>
<td class="mbox-text" style="">The <a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Embedded_lists" title="Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists">embedded lists</a> in this article <b>may contain items that are not <a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:NOT" title="Wikipedia:NOT" class="mw-redirect">encyclopedic</a></b>. Please <a class="external text" href="//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit">help out</a> by removing such elements and incorporating appropriate items into the main body of the article. <small><i>(August 2011)</i></small></td>
</tr>
</table>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class="multicol" style="background:transparent; width:100%;">
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<p><b>Politicians</b></p>
<ul>
<li>Vice-President <a href="/wiki/John_C._Calhoun" title="John C. Calhoun">John C. Calhoun</a> (1782–1850)</li>
<li>President <a href="/wiki/Grover_Cleveland" title="Grover Cleveland">Grover Cleveland</a> (1837–1908)</li>
<li>President <a href="/wiki/William_McKinley" title="William McKinley">William McKinley</a> (1843–1901)</li>
<li>Secretary of State <a href="/wiki/Elihu_Root" title="Elihu Root">Elihu Root</a> (1845–1937)</li>
<li>President <a href="/wiki/Calvin_Coolidge" title="Calvin Coolidge">Calvin Coolidge</a> (1872–1933)</li>
<li>Congressman <a href="/wiki/Howard_W._Smith" title="Howard W. Smith">Howard W. Smith</a> (1883–1976)</li>
<li>Senator <a href="/wiki/Robert_Taft" title="Robert Taft">Robert Taft</a> (1889–1953)</li>
<li>President <a href="/wiki/Dwight_Eisenhower" title="Dwight Eisenhower" class="mw-redirect">Dwight Eisenhower</a> (1890–1969)</li>
<li>Senator <a href="/wiki/Richard_Russell,_Jr." title="Richard Russell, Jr.">Richard Russell, Jr.</a> (1897–1971)</li>
<li>Senator <a href="/wiki/Strom_Thurmond" title="Strom Thurmond">Strom Thurmond</a> (1902–2003)</li>
<li>Ambassador <a href="/wiki/Clare_Boothe_Luce" title="Clare Boothe Luce">Clare Boothe Luce</a> (1903–1987)</li>
<li>Senator <a href="/wiki/Joseph_McCarthy" title="Joseph McCarthy">Joseph McCarthy</a> (1908–1957)</li>
<li>Senator <a href="/wiki/Barry_Goldwater" title="Barry Goldwater">Barry Goldwater</a> (1909–1998), 1964 GOP presidential candidate</li>
<li>President <a href="/wiki/Ronald_Reagan" title="Ronald Reagan">Ronald Reagan</a> (1911–2004)</li>
<li>President <a href="/wiki/Richard_Nixon" title="Richard Nixon">Richard Nixon</a> (1913–1994)</li>
<li>Senator <a href="/wiki/Jesse_Helms" title="Jesse Helms">Jesse Helms</a> (1921–2008)</li>
<li>Senate Majority Leader <a href="/wiki/Robert_Dole" title="Robert Dole" class="mw-redirect">Robert Dole</a> (1923–), 1996 GOP presidential candidate</li>
<li>Secretary of State <a href="/wiki/Henry_Kissinger" title="Henry Kissinger">Henry Kissinger</a> (1923-)</li>
<li>UN Ambassador <a href="/wiki/Jeane_Kirkpatrick" title="Jeane Kirkpatrick">Jeane Kirkpatrick</a> (1926–2006)</li>
<li>Secretary of Defense <a href="/wiki/Donald_Rumsfeld" title="Donald Rumsfeld">Donald Rumsfeld</a> (1932–)</li>
<li>Senator <a href="/wiki/James_Inhofe" title="James Inhofe" class="mw-redirect">James Inhofe</a> (1934–)</li>
<li>Congressman <a href="/wiki/Larry_McDonald" title="Larry McDonald">Larry McDonald</a> (1935–1983)</li>
<li>Congressman <a href="/wiki/Jack_Kemp" title="Jack Kemp">Jack Kemp</a> (1935–2009)</li>
<li>Congressman <a href="/wiki/Ron_Paul" title="Ron Paul">Ron Paul</a> (1935–)</li>
<li>Senator <a href="/wiki/John_McCain" title="John McCain">John McCain</a> (1939–), 2008 GOP presidential candidate</li>
<li>House Majority Leader <a href="/wiki/Dick_Armey" title="Dick Armey">Dick Armey</a> (1940-)</li>
<li>Vice President <a href="/wiki/Dick_Cheney" title="Dick Cheney">Dick Cheney</a> (1941–)</li>
<li>Attorney General <a href="/wiki/John_Ashcroft" title="John Ashcroft">John Ashcroft</a> (1942–)</li>
<li>Senate Minority Leader <a href="/wiki/Mitch_McConnell" title="Mitch McConnell">Mitch McConnell</a> (1942–)</li>
<li>Speaker of the House <a href="/wiki/Newt_Gingrich" title="Newt Gingrich">Newt Gingrich</a> (1943–)</li>
<li>President <a href="/wiki/George_W._Bush" title="George W. Bush">George W. Bush</a> (1946–)</li>
<li>Governor <a href="/wiki/Mitt_Romney" title="Mitt Romney">Mitt Romney</a> (1947–)</li>
<li>House Majority Leader <a href="/wiki/Tom_DeLay" title="Tom DeLay">Tom DeLay</a> (1947-)</li>
<li>UN Ambassador <a href="/wiki/John_R._Bolton" title="John R. Bolton">John Bolton</a> (1948–)</li>
<li>Speaker of the House <a href="/wiki/John_Boehner" title="John Boehner">John Boehner</a> (1949–)</li>
<li>Governor <a href="/wiki/Rick_Perry" title="Rick Perry">Rick Perry</a> (1950–)</li>
<li>Senator <a href="/wiki/Jim_DeMint" title="Jim DeMint">Jim DeMint</a> (1951–)</li>
<li>Governor <a href="/wiki/Bob_McDonnell" title="Bob McDonnell">Bob McDonnell</a> (1954–)</li>
<li>Secretary of State <a href="/wiki/Condoleezza_Rice" title="Condoleezza Rice">Condoleezza Rice</a> (1954–)</li>
<li>Governor <a href="/wiki/Mike_Huckabee" title="Mike Huckabee">Mike Huckabee</a> (1955–)</li>
<li>Attorney General <a href="/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales" title="Alberto Gonzales">Alberto Gonzales</a> (1955–)</li>
<li>Congresswoman <a href="/wiki/Michele_Bachmann" title="Michele Bachmann">Michele Bachmann</a> (1956–)</li>
<li>Senator <a href="/wiki/Rick_Santorum" title="Rick Santorum">Rick Santorum</a> (1958–)</li>
<li>RNC Chairman <a href="/wiki/Michael_Steele" title="Michael Steele">Michael Steele</a> (1958–)</li>
<li>Governor <a href="/wiki/Luis_Fortu%C3%B1o" title="Luis Fortuño">Luis Fortuño</a> (1960–)</li>
<li>Congressman <a href="/wiki/Allen_West_(politician)" title="Allen West (politician)">Allen West</a> (1961–)</li>
<li>Governor <a href="/wiki/Chris_Christie" title="Chris Christie">Chris Christie</a> (1962–)</li>
<li>House Majority Leader <a href="/wiki/Eric_Cantor" title="Eric Cantor">Eric Cantor</a> (1963–)</li>
<li>Senator <a href="/wiki/Rand_Paul" title="Rand Paul">Rand Paul</a> (1963–)</li>
<li>Governor <a href="/wiki/Sarah_Palin" title="Sarah Palin">Sarah Palin</a> (1964–)</li>
<li>Governor <a href="/wiki/Scott_Walker_(politician)" title="Scott Walker (politician)">Scott Walker</a> (1967-)</li>
<li>Congressman <a href="/wiki/Paul_Ryan" title="Paul Ryan">Paul Ryan</a> (1970–)</li>
<li>Governor <a href="/wiki/Bobby_Jindal" title="Bobby Jindal">Bobby Jindal</a> (1971–)</li>
<li>Senator <a href="/wiki/Marco_Rubio" title="Marco Rubio">Marco Rubio</a> (1971–)</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Jurists</b></p>
<ul>
<li>Chief Justice and President <a href="/wiki/William_Howard_Taft" title="William Howard Taft">William Howard Taft</a> (1857–1930)</li>
<li>Chief Justice <a href="/wiki/Charles_Evans_Hughes" title="Charles Evans Hughes">Charles Evans Hughes</a> (1868–1948)</li>
<li>Chief Justice <a href="/wiki/William_Rehnquist" title="William Rehnquist">William Rehnquist</a> (1924–2005)</li>
<li>Chief Justice <a href="/wiki/John_Roberts" title="John Roberts">John Roberts</a> (1955–)</li>
<li>Justice <a href="/wiki/Antonin_Scalia" title="Antonin Scalia">Antonin Scalia</a> (1936–)</li>
<li>Justice <a href="/wiki/Clarence_Thomas" title="Clarence Thomas">Clarence Thomas</a> (1948–)</li>
<li>Justice <a href="/wiki/Samuel_Alito" title="Samuel Alito">Samuel Alito</a> (1950–)</li>
<li>Judge <a href="/wiki/Robert_Bork" title="Robert Bork">Robert Bork</a> (1927–)</li>
<li>Judge <a href="/wiki/Richard_Posner" title="Richard Posner">Richard Posner</a> (1939–)</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Intellectuals and activists</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/William_Graham_Sumner" title="William Graham Sumner">William Graham Sumner</a> (1840–1910)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Albert_Jay_Nock" title="Albert Jay Nock">Albert Jay Nock</a> (1873–1945)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/F._A._Hayek" title="F. A. Hayek" class="mw-redirect">F. A. Hayek</a> (1899–1992)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Leo_Strauss" title="Leo Strauss">Leo Strauss</a> (1899–1973)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Robert_W._Welch" title="Robert W. Welch" class="mw-redirect">Robert W. Welch</a> (1900–1985)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Whittaker_Chambers" title="Whittaker Chambers">Whittaker Chambers</a> (1901–1961)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Ayn_Rand" title="Ayn Rand">Ayn Rand</a> (1905–1982)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Richard_M._Weaver" title="Richard M. Weaver">Richard M. Weaver</a> (1910–1963)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/George_J._Stigler" title="George J. Stigler" class="mw-redirect">George J. Stigler</a> (1911–1991)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Milton_Friedman" title="Milton Friedman">Milton Friedman</a> (1912–2006)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Robert_A._Nisbet" title="Robert A. Nisbet" class="mw-redirect">Robert A. Nisbet</a> (1913–1996)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Russell_Kirk" title="Russell Kirk">Russell Kirk</a> (1918–1994)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Irving_Kristol" title="Irving Kristol">Irving Kristol</a> (1920–2009)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Phyllis_Schlafly" title="Phyllis Schlafly">Phyllis Schlafly</a> (1924–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/William_F._Buckley,_Jr." title="William F. Buckley, Jr.">William F. Buckley, Jr.</a> (1925–2008)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Samuel_P._Huntington" title="Samuel P. Huntington">Samuel P. Huntington</a> (1927–2008)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Norman_Podhoretz" title="Norman Podhoretz">Norman Podhoretz</a> (1930–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Thomas_Sowell" title="Thomas Sowell">Thomas Sowell</a> (1930–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/James_Q._Wilson" title="James Q. Wilson">James Q. Wilson</a> (1931–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Robert_Novak" title="Robert Novak">Robert Novak</a> (1931–2009)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Walter_E._Williams" title="Walter E. Williams">Walter Williams</a> (1936–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Pat_Buchanan" title="Pat Buchanan">Pat Buchanan</a> (1938–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Paul_Gottfried" title="Paul Gottfried">Paul Gottfried</a> (1941-)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/George_Will" title="George Will">George Will</a> (1941–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Cal_Thomas" title="Cal Thomas">Cal Thomas</a> (1942–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Peggy_Noonan" title="Peggy Noonan">Peggy Noonan</a> (1950–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer" title="Charles Krauthammer">Charles Krauthammer</a> (1950–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Karl_Rove" title="Karl Rove">Karl Rove</a> (1950–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Lee_Atwater" title="Lee Atwater">Lee Atwater</a> (1951–1991)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/William_Kristol" title="William Kristol">Bill Kristol</a> (1952–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Mary_Matalin" title="Mary Matalin">Mary Matalin</a> (1953-)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/L._Brent_Bozell_III" title="L. Brent Bozell III">Brent Bozell</a> (1955–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Pamela_Geller" title="Pamela Geller">Pamela Geller</a> (1958–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Ann_Coulter" title="Ann Coulter">Ann Coulter</a> (1961–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Elizabeth_Cheney" title="Elizabeth Cheney">Elizabeth Cheney</a> (1966–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Jonah_Goldberg" title="Jonah Goldberg">Jonah Goldberg</a> (1969–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Michelle_Malkin" title="Michelle Malkin">Michelle Malkin</a> (1970–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Erick_Erickson" title="Erick Erickson">Erick Erickson</a> (1975-)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/S._E._Cupp" title="S. E. Cupp">S. E. Cupp</a> (1979–)</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">
<p><b>Foundations</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/Adolph_Coors_Foundation" title="Adolph Coors Foundation">Adolph Coors Foundation</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Bradley_Foundation" title="Bradley Foundation">Bradley Foundation</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Koch_Family_Foundations" title="Koch Family Foundations">Koch Family Foundations</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Scaife_Foundations" title="Scaife Foundations">Scaife Foundations</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/John_M._Olin_Foundation" title="John M. Olin Foundation">John M. Olin Foundation</a>, closed in 2005</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Media personalities, radio hosts, and bloggers</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/Bob_Grant_(radio)" title="Bob Grant (radio)">Bob Grant</a> (1929–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Roger_Ailes" title="Roger Ailes">Roger Ailes</a> (1940–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Michael_Savage_(commentator)" title="Michael Savage (commentator)" class="mw-redirect">Michael Savage</a> (1942–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/William_Bennett" title="William Bennett">William Bennett</a> (1943–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Neal_Boortz" title="Neal Boortz">Neal Boortz</a> (1945–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Herman_Cain" title="Herman Cain">Herman Cain</a> (1945–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Lou_Dobbs" title="Lou Dobbs">Lou Dobbs</a> (1945–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/John_Gibson_(political_commentator)" title="John Gibson (political commentator)">John Gibson</a> (1946–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Donald_Trump" title="Donald Trump">Donald Trump</a> (1946-)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Bill_Cunningham" title="Bill Cunningham">Bill Cunningham</a> (1947–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Laura_Schlessinger" title="Laura Schlessinger">Laura Schlessinger</a> (1947-)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Michael_Medved" title="Michael Medved">Michael Medved</a> (1948–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Dennis_Prager" title="Dennis Prager">Dennis Prager</a> (1948–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Jesse_Lee_Peterson" title="Jesse Lee Peterson">Jesse Lee Peterson</a> (1949–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Bill_O%27Reilly_(political_commentator)" title="Bill O'Reilly (political commentator)">Bill O'Reilly</a> (1949–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Alan_Keyes" title="Alan Keyes">Alan Keyes</a> (1950–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Sandy_Rios" title="Sandy Rios">Sandy Rios</a> (1951–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh" title="Rush Limbaugh">Rush Limbaugh</a> (1951–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Larry_Elder" title="Larry Elder">Larry Elder</a> (1952–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Joseph_Farah" title="Joseph Farah">Joseph Farah</a> (1954–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Tony_Snow" title="Tony Snow">Tony Snow</a> (1955–2008)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Hugh_Hewitt" title="Hugh Hewitt">Hugh Hewitt</a> (1956–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Mark_Levin" title="Mark Levin">Mark Levin</a> (1957–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Neil_Cavuto" title="Neil Cavuto">Neil Cavuto</a> (1958–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Dave_Ramsey" title="Dave Ramsey">Dave Ramsey</a> (1960–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Sean_Hannity" title="Sean Hannity">Sean Hannity</a> (1961–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Glenn_Beck" title="Glenn Beck">Glenn Beck</a> (1964–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Laura_Ingraham" title="Laura Ingraham">Laura Ingraham</a> (1964–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Matt_Drudge" title="Matt Drudge">Matt Drudge</a> (1966–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Monica_Crowley" title="Monica Crowley">Monica Crowley</a> (1968–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Andrew_Breitbart" title="Andrew Breitbart">Andrew Breitbart</a> (1969–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Tucker_Carlson" title="Tucker Carlson">Tucker Carlson</a> (1969–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Dana_Perino" title="Dana Perino">Dana Perino</a> (1972–)</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Think-tanks</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/Acton_Institute" title="Acton Institute">Acton Institute</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/American_Enterprise_Institute" title="American Enterprise Institute">American Enterprise Institute</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Cato_Institute" title="Cato Institute">Cato Institute</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Freedomworks" title="Freedomworks" class="mw-redirect">Freedomworks</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/The_Heritage_Foundation" title="The Heritage Foundation">Heritage Foundation</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Hoover_Institution" title="Hoover Institution">Hoover Institution</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Manhattan_Institute" title="Manhattan Institute" class="mw-redirect">Manhattan Institute</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Project_for_a_New_American_Century" title="Project for a New American Century" class="mw-redirect">Project for a New American Century</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Rockford_Institute" title="Rockford Institute">Rockford Institute</a></li>
</ul>
<p><b>Magazines and media</b></p>
<ul>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/Commentary_(magazine)" title="Commentary (magazine)">Commentary</a></i></li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/National_Review" title="National Review">National Review</a></i></li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/The_American_Spectator" title="The American Spectator">The American Spectator</a></i></li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/Policy_Review" title="Policy Review">Policy Review</a></i></li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/The_Weekly_Standard" title="The Weekly Standard">The Weekly Standard</a></i></li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/The_American_Conservative" title="The American Conservative">The American Conservative</a></i></li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/Humanitas_(journal)" title="Humanitas (journal)">Humanitas</a></i></li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/Modern_Age" title="Modern Age" class="mw-redirect">Modern Age</a></i></li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/First_Things" title="First Things">First Things</a></i></li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/Chronicles_magazine" title="Chronicles magazine" class="mw-redirect">Chronicles magazine</a></i></li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/Human_Events" title="Human Events">Human Events</a></i></li>
</ul>
<p><b>Organizations</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/Eagle_Forum" title="Eagle Forum">Eagle Forum</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Federalist_Society" title="Federalist Society">Federalist Society</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Focus_on_the_Family" title="Focus on the Family">Focus on the Family</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Intercollegiate_Studies_Institute" title="Intercollegiate Studies Institute">Intercollegiate Studies Institute</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/National_Rifle_Association" title="National Rifle Association">National Rifle Association</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/United_States_Chamber_of_Commerce" title="United States Chamber of Commerce">United States Chamber of Commerce</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Americans_for_Prosperity" title="Americans for Prosperity">Americans for Prosperity</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/American_Solutions_for_Winning_the_Future" title="American Solutions for Winning the Future">American Solutions for Winning the Future</a>, closed in 2011</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/John_Birch_Society" title="John Birch Society">John Birch Society</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Council_of_Conservative_Citizens" title="Council of Conservative Citizens">Council of Conservative Citizens</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Tea_Party_movement" title="Tea Party movement">Tea Party movement</a></li>
</ul>
<p><b>Religious leaders active in conservative politics</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/Hal_Lindsey" title="Hal Lindsey">Hal Lindsey</a> (1929–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Pat_Robertson" title="Pat Robertson">Pat Robertson</a> (1930–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Jack_Van_Impe" title="Jack Van Impe">Jack Van Impe</a> (1931–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Jerry_Falwell" title="Jerry Falwell">Jerry Falwell</a> (1933–2007)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/James_Dobson" title="James Dobson">James Dobson</a> (1936–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/John_Hagee" title="John Hagee">John Hagee</a> (1940–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Richard_D._Land" title="Richard D. Land" class="mw-redirect">Richard D. Land</a> (1946–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Bill_Donohue" title="Bill Donohue" class="mw-redirect">Bill Donohue</a> (1947–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Ralph_E._Reed,_Jr." title="Ralph E. Reed, Jr.">Ralph E. Reed, Jr.</a> (1961–)</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Tony_Perkins_(politician)" title="Tony Perkins (politician)">Tony Perkins</a> (1963–)</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=64" title="Edit section: See also">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="See_also">See also</span></h2>
<div class="noprint tright portal" style="border:solid #aaa 1px; margin:0.5em 0 0.5em 0.5em;">
<table style="background:#f9f9f9; font-size:85%; line-height:110%; max-width:175px;">
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="/wiki/File:Flag_of_the_United_States.svg" class="image"><img alt="Portal icon" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a4/Flag_of_the_United_States.svg/32px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png" width="32" height="17" /></a></td>
<td style="padding: 0 0.2em; vertical-align: middle"><i><b><a href="/wiki/Portal:United_States" title="Portal:United States">United States  portal</a></b></i></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="/wiki/File:A_coloured_voting_box.svg" class="image"><img alt="Portal icon" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/01/A_coloured_voting_box.svg/28px-A_coloured_voting_box.svg.png" width="28" height="28" /></a></td>
<td style="padding: 0 0.2em; vertical-align: middle"><i><b><a href="/wiki/Portal:Politics" title="Portal:Politics">Politics  portal</a></b></i></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td style="text-align: center;"><a href="/wiki/File:DodgerBlue_flag_waving.svg" class="image"><img alt="Portal icon" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/DodgerBlue_flag_waving.svg/26px-DodgerBlue_flag_waving.svg.png" width="26" height="28" /></a></td>
<td style="padding: 0 0.2em; vertical-align: middle"><i><b><a href="/wiki/Portal:Conservatism" title="Portal:Conservatism">Conservatism  portal</a></b></i></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/Bibliography_of_conservatism_in_the_United_States" title="Bibliography of conservatism in the United States">Bibliography of conservatism in the United States</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Compassionate_conservatism" title="Compassionate conservatism">Compassionate conservatism</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Common_sense_conservative" title="Common sense conservative">Common sense conservative</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Conservative_talk" title="Conservative talk" class="mw-redirect">Conservative talk</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Constitution_Party_(United_States)" title="Constitution Party (United States)">Constitution Party</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Neoconservatism" title="Neoconservatism">Neoconservatism</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Neoconservatism_and_paleoconservatism" title="Neoconservatism and paleoconservatism">Neoconservatism and paleoconservatism</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/New_Right" title="New Right">New Right</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Old_Right_(United_States)" title="Old Right (United States)">Old Right</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Paleoconservatism" title="Paleoconservatism">Paleoconservatism</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Reactionary" title="Reactionary">Reactionary</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Reagan_Doctrine" title="Reagan Doctrine">Reagan Doctrine</a> foreign policy</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Christian_right" title="Christian right">Religious right</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Tea_Party_movement" title="Tea Party movement">Tea Party movement</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Traditionalist_conservatism" title="Traditionalist conservatism">Traditionalist conservatism</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Timeline_of_modern_American_conservatism" title="Timeline of modern American conservatism">Timeline of modern American conservatism</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/United_States_Republican_Party" title="United States Republican Party" class="mw-redirect">United States Republican Party</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Differences_between_conservative_and_liberal_brain" title="Differences between conservative and liberal brain" class="mw-redirect">Differences between conservative and liberal brain</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Category:Conservative_parties_in_the_United_States" title="Category:Conservative parties in the United States">Category:Conservative parties in the United States</a></li>
</ul>
<p><b>Other ideologies:</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/Libertarianism" title="Libertarianism">Libertarianism</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Liberalism_in_the_United_States" title="Liberalism in the United States">Liberalism in the United States</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Progressivism_in_the_United_States" title="Progressivism in the United States">Progressivism in the United States</a></li>
</ul>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=65" title="Edit section: Organizations and publications">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Organizations_and_publications">Organizations and publications</span></h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/American_Enterprise_Institute" title="American Enterprise Institute">American Enterprise Institute</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Cato_Institute" title="Cato Institute">Cato Institute</a>, a libertarian think tank.</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/First_Things" title="First Things">First Things</a>, a theoconservative publication.</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/FreedomWorks" title="FreedomWorks">FreedomWorks</a>, a conservative activist group.</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Independence_Institute" title="Independence Institute">Independence Institute</a>, a conservative think tank</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Intercollegiate_Studies_Institute" title="Intercollegiate Studies Institute">Intercollegiate Studies Institute</a>, a traditionalist conservative academic organization.</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Leadership_Institute" title="Leadership Institute">Leadership Institute</a>, an organization for conservative activists.</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Manhattan_Institute_for_Policy_Research" title="Manhattan Institute for Policy Research">Manhattan Institute for Policy Research</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Project_for_a_New_American_Century" title="Project for a New American Century" class="mw-redirect">Project for a New American Century</a>, a neoconservative think tank.</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/The_Heritage_Foundation" title="The Heritage Foundation">The Heritage Foundation</a>, a conservative think tank.</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Clare_Boothe_Luce_Policy_Institute" title="Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute" class="mw-redirect">Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute</a>, home to conservative women leaders. Focused on advancing women through conservative ideas.</li>
</ul>
<h3><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=66" title="Edit section: Media">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Media">Media</span></h3>
<ul>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/The_American_Spectator" title="The American Spectator">The American Spectator</a></i> magazine, a conservative political magazine.</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Chronicles_(magazine)" title="Chronicles (magazine)"><i>Chronicles</i> magazine</a>, a paleoconservative publication.</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/City_Journal_(New_York)" title="City Journal (New York)">City Journal</a>, official publication of the <a href="/wiki/Manhattan_Institute" title="Manhattan Institute" class="mw-redirect">Manhattan Institute</a>.</li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/Humanitas_(journal)" title="Humanitas (journal)">Humanitas</a></i>, a traditionalist conservative publication.</li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/Modern_Age_(periodical)" title="Modern Age (periodical)">Modern Age</a></i>, a traditionalist conservative intellectual journal.</li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/National_Review" title="National Review">National Review</a></i> magazine, a conservative political magazine.</li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/Policy_Review" title="Policy Review">Policy Review</a></i> magazine, a conservative academic magazine.</li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/The_American_Conservative" title="The American Conservative">The American Conservative</a></i>, a paleoconservative publication.</li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/The_Weekly_Standard" title="The Weekly Standard">The Weekly Standard</a></i> magazine, a neoconservative publication.</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Townhall.com" title="Townhall.com">Townhall.com</a>, conservative news, information, and commentary.</li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/Breitbart.com" title="Breitbart.com" class="mw-redirect">Breitbart.com</a></i> online news network started by <a href="/wiki/Andrew_Breitbart" title="Andrew Breitbart">Andrew Breitbart</a>, conservative publisher.</li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/Human_Events" title="Human Events">Human Events</a></i>, a weekly American conservative magazine.</li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/FrontPage_Magazine" title="FrontPage Magazine">FrontPage Magazine</a></i>, a conservative pro-Israel website promoting <a href="/wiki/Western_culture" title="Western culture">western culture</a> founded by <a href="/wiki/David_Horowitz" title="David Horowitz">David Horowitz</a>.</li>
<li><i><a href="/wiki/VDARE" title="VDARE">VDARE</a></i>, an immigration focused, anti-multicultural website with conservative articles by <a href="/wiki/Alien_Nation" title="Alien Nation">Alien Nation</a> author <a href="/wiki/Peter_Brimelow" title="Peter Brimelow">Peter Brimelow</a></li>
</ul>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=67" title="Edit section: References">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="References">References</span></h2>
<div class="reflist references-column-count references-column-count-2" style="-moz-column-count: 2; -webkit-column-count: 2; column-count: 2; list-style-type: decimal;">
<ol class="references">
<li id="cite_note-0"><b><a href="#cite_ref-0">^</a></b> Patrick Allitt, <i>The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities Throughout American History</i>, p. "before the 1950s there was no such thing as a conservative <i>movement</i> in the United States.", Yale University Press, 2009, <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780300164183" class="internal mw-magiclink-isbn">ISBN 9780300164183</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-1"><b><a href="#cite_ref-1">^</a></b> Gregory Schneider, <i>The Conservative Century: From Reaction to Revolution</i> (Rowman &amp; Littlefield. 2009) p. xii</li>
<li id="cite_note-Social-2"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Social_2-0">^</a></b> <span class="citation book">Cal Jillson (22 February 2011). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://books.google.com/books?id=fQFZCrbc9mIC&amp;pg=PA87&amp;dq=social+conservatism+abortion+marriage&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=njIXT9f-KILb0QGehoXIAg&amp;ved=0CD0Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&amp;q=social%20conservatism%20abortion%20marriage&amp;f=false"><i>Texas Politics: Governing the Lone Star State</i></a>. <a href="/wiki/Taylor_%26_Francis" title="Taylor &amp; Francis">Taylor &amp; Francis</a><span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://books.google.com/books?id=fQFZCrbc9mIC&amp;pg=PA87&amp;dq=social+conservatism+abortion+marriage&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=njIXT9f-KILb0QGehoXIAg&amp;ved=0CD0Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&amp;q=social%20conservatism%20abortion%20marriage&amp;f=false">http://books.google.com/books?id=fQFZCrbc9mIC&amp;pg=PA87&amp;dq=social+conservatism+abortion+marriage&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=njIXT9f-KILb0QGehoXIAg&amp;ved=0CD0Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&amp;q=social%20conservatism%20abortion%20marriage&amp;f=false</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 19 January 2012</span>. "Social conservatives focus on moral or values issues, such as abortion, marriage, school prayer, and judicial appointments."</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Texas+Politics%3A+Governing+the+Lone+Star+State&amp;rft.aulast=Cal+Jillson&amp;rft.au=Cal+Jillson&amp;rft.date=22+February+2011&amp;rft.pub=%5B%5BTaylor+%26+Francis%5D%5D&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DfQFZCrbc9mIC%26pg%3DPA87%26dq%3Dsocial%2Bconservatism%2Babortion%2Bmarriage%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26ei%3DnjIXT9f-KILb0QGehoXIAg%26ved%3D0CD0Q6AEwAQ%23v%3Donepage%26q%3Dsocial%2520conservatism%2520abortion%2520marriage%26f%3Dfalse&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-3"><b><a href="#cite_ref-3">^</a></b> Bruce Frohnen, ed. <i>American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia</i> (2006) pp ix to xiv</li>
<li id="cite_note-Paleoconservative2-4"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Paleoconservative2_4-0">^</a></b> <span class="citation book">Michael Foley (25 October 2007). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://books.google.com/books?id=hqbHa_AJrtMC&amp;pg=PA318&amp;dq=paleoconservative+immigration&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=kDQXT5PzLMbg0QGfuo3tAg&amp;ved=0CEoQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&amp;q=paleoconservative%20immigration&amp;f=false"><i>American credo: the place of ideas in US politics</i></a>. <a href="/wiki/Oxford_University_Press" title="Oxford University Press">Oxford University Press</a><span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://books.google.com/books?id=hqbHa_AJrtMC&amp;pg=PA318&amp;dq=paleoconservative+immigration&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=kDQXT5PzLMbg0QGfuo3tAg&amp;ved=0CEoQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&amp;q=paleoconservative%20immigration&amp;f=false">http://books.google.com/books?id=hqbHa_AJrtMC&amp;pg=PA318&amp;dq=paleoconservative+immigration&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=kDQXT5PzLMbg0QGfuo3tAg&amp;ved=0CEoQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&amp;q=paleoconservative%20immigration&amp;f=false</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 18 January 2012</span>. "Against accusations of being pre-modern or even anti-modern in outlook, paleoconservatives press for restrictions on immigration, a rollback of multicultural programmes, the decentralization of the federal polity, the restoration of controls upon free trade, a greater emphasis upon economic nationalism and isolationism in the conduct of American foreign policy, and a generally <i>revanchist</i> outlook upon a social order in need of recovering old lines of distinction and in particular the assignment of roles in accordance with traditional categories of gender, ethnicity, and race."</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=American+credo%3A+the+place+of+ideas+in+US+politics&amp;rft.aulast=Michael+Foley&amp;rft.au=Michael+Foley&amp;rft.date=25+October+2007&amp;rft.pub=%5B%5BOxford+University+Press%5D%5D&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DhqbHa_AJrtMC%26pg%3DPA318%26dq%3Dpaleoconservative%2Bimmigration%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26ei%3DkDQXT5PzLMbg0QGfuo3tAg%26ved%3D0CEoQ6AEwAw%23v%3Donepage%26q%3Dpaleoconservative%2520immigration%26f%3Dfalse&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-5"><b><a href="#cite_ref-5">^</a></b> Paul Edward Gottfried, <i>Conservatism in America: Making Sense of the American Right</i>, p. 9, "Postwar conservatives set about creating their own synthesis of free-market capitalism, Christian morality, and the global struggle against Communism." (2009); Gottfried, <i>Theologies and moral concern</i> (1995) p. 12</li>
<li id="cite_note-Buckley-6"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Buckley_6-0">^</a></b> <i>Founding Statement of <a href="/wiki/National_Review" title="National Review">National Review</a></i>. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/223549/our-mission-statement/william-f-buckley-jr">http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/223549/our-mission-statement/william-f-buckley-jr</a>.</li>
<li id="cite_note-7"><b><a href="#cite_ref-7">^</a></b> Sean Wilentz, <i>The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974–2008</i> (2009); John Ehrman, <i>The Eighties: America in the Age of Reagan</i> (2008)</li>
<li id="cite_note-8"><b><a href="#cite_ref-8">^</a></b> William Safire, <i>Safire's Political Dictionary</i>, Oxford University Press, 2008, <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780195340617" class="internal mw-magiclink-isbn">ISBN 9780195340617</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-9"><b><a href="#cite_ref-9">^</a></b> <span class="citation web">Ahoura Afsha. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://projects.essex.ac.uk/ehrr/V3N1/Afshar.pdf">"The Anti-gay Rights Movement in the United States: The Framing of Religion"</a>. <a href="/wiki/University_of_Essex" title="University of Essex">University of Essex</a><span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://projects.essex.ac.uk/ehrr/V3N1/Afshar.pdf">http://projects.essex.ac.uk/ehrr/V3N1/Afshar.pdf</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 10 July 2011</span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.btitle=The+Anti-gay+Rights+Movement+in+the+United+States%3A++The+Framing+of+Religion&amp;rft.atitle=&amp;rft.aulast=Ahoura+Afsha&amp;rft.au=Ahoura+Afsha&amp;rft.pub=%5B%5BUniversity+of+Essex%5D%5D&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fprojects.essex.ac.uk%2Fehrr%2FV3N1%2FAfshar.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-10"><b><a href="#cite_ref-10">^</a></b> Julian E. Zelizer, ed. <i>The Presidency of George W. Bush: A First Historical Assessment</i> (2010) ch 6</li>
<li id="cite_note-11"><b><a href="#cite_ref-11">^</a></b> Jim Mann, <i>Rise Of The Vulcans: The History of Bush's War Cabinet</i>(2004)</li>
<li id="cite_note-12"><b><a href="#cite_ref-12">^</a></b> Peter J. Jacques; Riley E. Dunlap; Mark Freeman, <i>The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism</i>, Environmental Politics. v12 m3 (2008), Pages 349 – 385</li>
<li id="cite_note-13"><b><a href="#cite_ref-13">^</a></b> Benjamin Balint, <i>Running Commentary: The Contentious Magazine That Transformed the Jewish Left Into the Neoconservative Right</i> (2010)</li>
<li id="cite_note-14"><b><a href="#cite_ref-14">^</a></b> Donald T. Critchlow, <i>Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism: a Woman's Crusade</i>, p. 217, Princeton University Press, 2007, <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780691136240" class="internal mw-magiclink-isbn">ISBN 978-0691136240</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-15"><b><a href="#cite_ref-15">^</a></b> George H. Nash, <i>Reappraising the Right: The Past and Future of American Conservatism</i> (2009) says, "abortion, school prayer, pornography, drug use, sexual deviancy ... In a very real sense the Religious Right was closest in its concerns to traditionalist conservatism." p. 325</li>
<li id="cite_note-16"><b><a href="#cite_ref-16">^</a></b> Glenn Utter and Robert J. Spitzer, <i>Encyclopedia of Gun Control &amp; Gun Rights</i> (2nd ed. 2011)</li>
<li id="cite_note-17"><b><a href="#cite_ref-17">^</a></b> The "law and order" issue was a major factor weakening liberalism in the 1960s, argues Michael W. Flamm, <i>Law and Order: Street Crime, Civil Unrest, and the Crisis of Liberalism in the 1960s</i> (2005)</li>
<li id="cite_note-18"><b><a href="#cite_ref-18">^</a></b> Gallup, "U.S. Political Ideology Stable With Conservatives Leading" <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/148745/Political-Ideology-Stable-Conservatives-Leading.aspx">Gallup, August 1, 2011, online</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-19"><b><a href="#cite_ref-19">^</a></b> Juliana Horowitz, "Winds of Political Change Haven’t Shifted Public’s Ideology Balance," <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1042/winds-of-political-change-havent--shifted-publics-ideology-balance">Pew Research Center for the People &amp; the Press, press release November 25, 2008</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-20"><b><a href="#cite_ref-20">^</a></b> Leo P. Ribuffo, "20 Suggestions for Studying the Right now that Studying the Right is Trendy," <i>Historically Speaking</i> Jan 2011 v.12#1 pp 2–6, quote on p. 6</li>
<li id="cite_note-21"><b><a href="#cite_ref-21">^</a></b> For example, Arthur Aughey, Greta Jones, W. T. M. Riches, <i>The Conservative Political Tradition in Britain and the United States</i> (1992), p. 1: "...there are those who advance the thesis that American exceptionalism means...there can be no American conservatism precisely because the American Revolution created a universally <i>liberal</i> society."</li>
<li id="cite_note-22"><b><a href="#cite_ref-22">^</a></b> <i>The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities Throughout American History</i> (Yale U.P. 2009), p. 278</li>
<li id="cite_note-23"><b><a href="#cite_ref-23">^</a></b> Iain McLean and Alistair McMillan, <i>Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics</i>, p. 114, "Conservative ideas are, thus, more genuine and profound than many critics suggest, but such unity as they have is purely negative, definable only by its opposition and rejection of abstract, universal, and ideal principles..."</li>
<li id="cite_note-Russell_Kirk_1953_p._6.2C_63-24">^ <a href="#cite_ref-Russell_Kirk_1953_p._6.2C_63_24-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Russell_Kirk_1953_p._6.2C_63_24-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> Russell Kirk, <i>The Conservative Mind</i> (1950), p. 6, 63.</li>
<li id="cite_note-25"><b><a href="#cite_ref-25">^</a></b> Joyce Appleby, <i>Thomas Jefferson</i> (Times Books, 2003) ch 7</li>
<li id="cite_note-26"><b><a href="#cite_ref-26">^</a></b> Allitt, <i>The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities</i> (2009), p. 65</li>
<li id="cite_note-27"><b><a href="#cite_ref-27">^</a></b> Patrick Allitt, <i>The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities</i>, p. 67</li>
<li id="cite_note-28"><b><a href="#cite_ref-28">^</a></b> George Brown Tindall &amp; David Emory Shi, <i>America: A narrative History</i>, pp. 665, W. W. Norton, <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780393927320" class="internal mw-magiclink-isbn">ISBN 9780393927320</a>.</li>
<li id="cite_note-29"><b><a href="#cite_ref-29">^</a></b> These churches were much weaker, poorer, and less central to American politics and society than established churches in Europe or Latin America.</li>
<li id="cite_note-30"><b><a href="#cite_ref-30">^</a></b> Robin W. Winks, ed. <i>The Oxford history of the British Empire: Historiography</i>, Volume V (2001) p107</li>
<li id="cite_note-31"><b><a href="#cite_ref-31">^</a></b> Leonard Woods Labaree, <i>Conservatism in Early American History</i> (1948) ch 1–2</li>
<li id="cite_note-32"><b><a href="#cite_ref-32">^</a></b> Richard Hofstadter, <i>America at 1750: A Social Portrait</i> (1971) ch 5</li>
<li id="cite_note-33"><b><a href="#cite_ref-33">^</a></b> Robert E. Brown and B. Katherine Brown, <i>Virginia 1705–1786: Democracy or Aristocracy?</i> (1964) pp 307–8</li>
<li id="cite_note-34"><b><a href="#cite_ref-34">^</a></b> Edward Countryman, <i>American Revolution</i> (1996) pp 36–44</li>
<li id="cite_note-35"><b><a href="#cite_ref-35">^</a></b> Norman Risjord, <i>Jefferson's America, 1760–1815</i> (2002) p 129</li>
<li id="cite_note-36"><b><a href="#cite_ref-36">^</a></b> Bernard Bailyn, <i>The Ordeal of Thomas Hutchinson: Loyalism and the Destruction of the First British Empire</i> (1974)</li>
<li id="cite_note-37"><b><a href="#cite_ref-37">^</a></b> David F. Burg, <i>A World History of Tax Rebellions: An Encyclopedia of Tax Rebels, Revolts, and Riots from Antiquity to the Present</i> (Routledge, 2003) p 253</li>
<li id="cite_note-38"><b><a href="#cite_ref-38">^</a></b> Labaree, <i>Conservatism</i> pp 164–65</li>
<li id="cite_note-39"><b><a href="#cite_ref-39">^</a></b> See also N. E. H. Hull, Peter C. Hoffer and Steven L. Allen, "Choosing Sides: A Quantitative Study of the Personality Determinants of Loyalist and Revolutionary Political Affiliation in New York," <i>Journal of American History,</i> Vol. 65, No. 2 (Sep., 1978), pp. 344–366 <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/1894084">in JSTOR</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-40"><b><a href="#cite_ref-40">^</a></b> Edwin G. Burrows and Michael Wallace, "The American Revolution: The Ideology and Psychology of National Liberation," <i>Perspectives in American History,</i> (1972) vol. 6 pp 167–306</li>
<li id="cite_note-41"><b><a href="#cite_ref-41">^</a></b> Gordon Wood, <i>The Radicalism of the American Revolution</i> (1991) pp. 176–77; quote on p 177.</li>
<li id="cite_note-42"><b><a href="#cite_ref-42">^</a></b> Ross N. Hebb, <i>Samuel Seabury and Charles Inglis: Two Bishops, Two Churches</i> (2010) p 82</li>
<li id="cite_note-43"><b><a href="#cite_ref-43">^</a></b> Patrick Allitt, <i>The Conservatives</i> (2009) pp 6–26</li>
<li id="cite_note-44"><b><a href="#cite_ref-44">^</a></b> Samuel Eliot Morison, <i>Harrison Gray Otis, 1765–1848: the urbane Federalist</i> (2nd ed. 1969) pages x–xi</li>
<li id="cite_note-45"><b><a href="#cite_ref-45">^</a></b> Patrick Allitt, <i>The Conservatives</i> (2009) p 26</li>
<li id="cite_note-46"><b><a href="#cite_ref-46">^</a></b> Chernow (2004)</li>
<li id="cite_note-47"><b><a href="#cite_ref-47">^</a></b> Calhoun at this stage was a leader of the nationalists. He later turned 180 degrees.</li>
<li id="cite_note-48"><b><a href="#cite_ref-48">^</a></b> See Norman K Risjord, <i>The Old Republicans: Southern conservatism in the age of Jefferson</i> (1965)</li>
<li id="cite_note-49"><b><a href="#cite_ref-49">^</a></b> Abraham Lincoln, <i>Abraham Lincoln: Speeches and Writings 1859-1865</i> (Library of America, 1989) <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://books.google.com/books?id=Ji9HvH_WW1sC&amp;pg=PA35&amp;dq=%22+nothing+save+and+except+to+restore+this+government%22&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=fwVRTo21KoLmiAKewMGuDg&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=8&amp;ved=0CFIQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&amp;q=%22%20nothing%20save%20and%20except%20to%20restore%20this%20government%22&amp;f=false">p. 35 online</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-50"><b><a href="#cite_ref-50">^</a></b> Harold Holzer, <i>Lincoln at Cooper Union: The Speech That Made Abraham Lincoln President</i> (2006) pp 134, 139, 144, 212, 306</li>
<li id="cite_note-51"><b><a href="#cite_ref-51">^</a></b> T. Harry Williams, <i>Lincoln and the Radicals</i> (1972)</li>
<li id="cite_note-52"><b><a href="#cite_ref-52">^</a></b> Boritt, <i>Lincoln and the Economics of the American Dream</i> (1994) pp 238, 257</li>
<li id="cite_note-53"><b><a href="#cite_ref-53">^</a></b> William C. Harris, <i>With Charity for All: Lincoln and the Restoration of the Union</i> (1998)</li>
<li id="cite_note-54"><b><a href="#cite_ref-54">^</a></b> Gabor S. Boritt, <i>Lincoln and the Economics of the American Dream</i> (1994)</li>
<li id="cite_note-55"><b><a href="#cite_ref-55">^</a></b> Norman Graeber, Lincoln the conservative statesman; In:The enduring Lincoln: Lincoln sesquicentennial lectures at the University of Illinois. University of Illinois Press, 1959,</li>
<li id="cite_note-56"><b><a href="#cite_ref-56">^</a></b> Randall, <i>Lincoln the Liberal Statesman</i> (1947) p 175. In: <i>The enduring Lincoln: Lincoln sesquicentennial lectures at the University of Illinois</i>. University of Illinois Press, 1959,</li>
<li id="cite_note-57"><b><a href="#cite_ref-57">^</a></b> J. David Greenstone, <i>The Lincoln Persuasion: Remaking American Liberalism</i> Princeton University Press, 1994. 26, 276–85.</li>
<li id="cite_note-58"><b><a href="#cite_ref-58">^</a></b> Dewey W. Grantham, <i>The Life and Death of the Solid South: A Political History</i> (1992)</li>
<li id="cite_note-59"><b><a href="#cite_ref-59">^</a></b> Jeff Woods, <i>Black struggle, red scare: segregation and anti-communism in the South</i> LSU Press, 2004.</li>
<li id="cite_note-60"><b><a href="#cite_ref-60">^</a></b> George B. Tindall, <i>The emergence of the new South, 1913–1945</i> pp 216–7, 425, 632–7, 718</li>
<li id="cite_note-61"><b><a href="#cite_ref-61">^</a></b> Alfred O. Hero, <i>The southerner and world affairs</i> (1965)</li>
<li id="cite_note-Merle_Black_2003-62">^ <a href="#cite_ref-Merle_Black_2003_62-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-Merle_Black_2003_62-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> Earl Black and Merle Black, <i>The Rise of Southern Republicans</i> (2003)</li>
<li id="cite_note-63"><b><a href="#cite_ref-63">^</a></b> Oran P. Smith, <i>The Rise of Baptist Republicanism</i> (2000)</li>
<li id="cite_note-64"><b><a href="#cite_ref-64">^</a></b> Allitt, <i>The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities</i> (2009), ch 5</li>
<li id="cite_note-65"><b><a href="#cite_ref-65">^</a></b> quoted in: David T. Beito and Linda Royster Beito, "Gold Democrats and the Decline of Classical Liberalism, 1896–1900, p. 559" <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=22&amp;articleID=261"><i>Independent Review</i> 4 (Spring 2000), 555–75 online</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-66"><b><a href="#cite_ref-66">^</a></b> Ronald Lora, ed. <i>The Conservative Press in Eighteenth-and Nineteenth-Century America</i> (1999) part 4 and 5.</li>
<li id="cite_note-67"><b><a href="#cite_ref-67">^</a></b> Robert Green McCloskey, <i>American conservatism in the age of enterprise, 1865–1910: a study of William Graham Sumner, Stephen J. Field, and Andrew Carnegie</i> (1964)</li>
<li id="cite_note-68"><b><a href="#cite_ref-68">^</a></b> Late in life Sumner wrote an essay focused on the dangers of monopoly. His unpublished essay of 1909, "On the Concentration of Wealth" shows his concern that pervasive corporate monopoly could be a grave threat to social equality and democratic government. Bruce Curtis, "William Graham Sumner 'On the Concentration of Wealth,'" <i>Journal of American History</i> 1969 55(4): 823–832.</li>
<li id="cite_note-69"><b><a href="#cite_ref-69">^</a></b> R. Hal Williams, <i>Realigning America: McKinley, Bryan, and the Remarkable Election of 1896</i> (2010)</li>
<li id="cite_note-70"><b><a href="#cite_ref-70">^</a></b> Frank Nincovich, "Theodore Roosevelt: Civilization as Ideology," <i>Diplomatic History</i> (summer 1986) 10:222-30</li>
<li id="cite_note-71"><b><a href="#cite_ref-71">^</a></b> Kenton J. Clymer, <i>John Hay: The Gentleman as Diplomat</i> (1975)</li>
<li id="cite_note-72"><b><a href="#cite_ref-72">^</a></b> Richard Leopold, <i>Elihu Root and the Conservative Tradition</i> (1954)</li>
<li id="cite_note-73"><b><a href="#cite_ref-73">^</a></b> Frederick W. Marks III, <i>Velvet on Iron: The Diplomacy of Theodore Roosevelt</i> (1979)</li>
<li id="cite_note-74"><b><a href="#cite_ref-74">^</a></b> Walter LaFeber, <i>The Cambridge History of American Foreign Relations: The American Search for Opportunity, 1865–1913, vol. 2</i> (1995)</li>
<li id="cite_note-75"><b><a href="#cite_ref-75">^</a></b> Elmus Wicker, <i>Great Debate On Banking Reform: Nelson Aldrich and the Origins of the Fed</i> (2005)</li>
<li id="cite_note-76"><b><a href="#cite_ref-76">^</a></b> William Letwin, <i>Law and Economic Policy in America: The Evolution of the Sherman Antitrust Act</i> (1965)</li>
<li id="cite_note-77"><b><a href="#cite_ref-77">^</a></b> George W. Ruiz, "The Ideological Convergence of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson," <i>Presidential Studies Quarterly,</i> Mar 1989, Vol. 19 Issue 1, pp 159–177</li>
<li id="cite_note-78"><b><a href="#cite_ref-78">^</a></b> William Henry Harbaugh, <i>Power and Responsibility: The Life and Times of Theodore Roosevelt</i> (1975)</li>
<li id="cite_note-79"><b><a href="#cite_ref-79">^</a></b> Norman M. Wilensky, <i>Conservatives in the Progressive era: The Taft Republicans of 1912</i> (1965)</li>
<li id="cite_note-80"><b><a href="#cite_ref-80">^</a></b> H. W. Brands, <i>T.R.: The Last Romantic</i> (1997) p. 753</li>
<li id="cite_note-81"><b><a href="#cite_ref-81">^</a></b> Seward W. Livermore, <i>Politics is Adjourned Woodrow Wilson and the War Congress, 1916–1918</i> (1966)</li>
<li id="cite_note-82"><b><a href="#cite_ref-82">^</a></b> Garland S. Tucker III, <i>The High Tide of American Conservatism: Davis, Coolidge and the 1924 Election</i> (2010)</li>
<li id="cite_note-83"><b><a href="#cite_ref-83">^</a></b> Morton Keller, <i>In Defense of Yesterday: James M. Beck and the Politics of Conservatism, 1861–1936</i> (1958)</li>
<li id="cite_note-84"><b><a href="#cite_ref-84">^</a></b> Dorothy Healey and Maurice Isserman, <i>Dorothy Healey Remembers: A Life in the American Communist Party</i>, Oxford University Press, 1990, <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780195038194" class="internal mw-magiclink-isbn">ISBN 978-0195038194</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-85"><b><a href="#cite_ref-85">^</a></b> Richard Gid Powers, <i>Not Without Honor: The History of American Anticommunism</i> (1996)</li>
<li id="cite_note-86"><b><a href="#cite_ref-86">^</a></b> David A. Hallman, "The Southern Voice in the Conservative Complaint of Modernist Literature," <i>Continuity,</i> 1984, Issue 9, pp 169–185</li>
<li id="cite_note-87"><b><a href="#cite_ref-87">^</a></b> Joseph M. Flora, Lucinda Hardwick MacKethan, and Todd W. Taylor, <i>The Companion to Southern Literature: Themes, Genres, Places, People, Movements, and Motifs</i> (2001)</li>
<li id="cite_note-88"><b><a href="#cite_ref-88">^</a></b> See John P. Diggins, <i>Up from Communism: Conservative Odysseys in American Intellectual History</i> (1976)</li>
<li id="cite_note-89"><b><a href="#cite_ref-89">^</a></b> For a detailed analysis of 65 of these magazines see Ronald Lora, <i>The Conservative Press in Twentieth-Century America</i> (Greenwood Press, 1999)</li>
<li id="cite_note-90"><b><a href="#cite_ref-90">^</a></b> <a href="/wiki/William_Randolph_Hearst" title="William Randolph Hearst">William Randolph Hearst</a> supported Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1932 for president, but broke decisively in late 1933. David Nasaw, <i>The Chief: The Life of William Randolph Hearst</i> (2001) pp 458, 469, 480</li>
<li id="cite_note-91"><b><a href="#cite_ref-91">^</a></b> Richard Norton Smith, <i>The Colonel: The Life and Legend of Robert R. McCormick</i> (2003) ch. 11</li>
<li id="cite_note-92"><b><a href="#cite_ref-92">^</a></b> Dennis McDougal, <i>Privileged Son: Otis Chandler and the Rise and Fall of the L.A. Times Dynasty</i> (2002) pp 65, 158, 191–92; the paper became less conservative after 1952.</li>
<li id="cite_note-93"><b><a href="#cite_ref-93">^</a></b> Brinkley, <i>The Publisher: Henry Luce and His American Century</i> (2010) pp. ix–x, 165, 197; Luce opposed Taft in 1952 and promoted Eisenhower. p. 370</li>
<li id="cite_note-94"><b><a href="#cite_ref-94">^</a></b> Larry N. Gerston and Terry Christensen, <i>California Politics and Government</i> (2008) p 40</li>
<li id="cite_note-95"><b><a href="#cite_ref-95">^</a></b> Charles W. Smith Jr.. <i>Public Opinion in a Democracy</i> (1939), pp. 85–86.</li>
<li id="cite_note-96"><b><a href="#cite_ref-96">^</a></b> Douglas B. Craig, <i>Fireside Politics: Radio and Political Culture in the United States, 1920–1940</i> (2005) p 163</li>
<li id="cite_note-97"><b><a href="#cite_ref-97">^</a></b> A study of 1,500 newspapers in 1976, 1980, and 1984 showed they supported Gerald Ford and Reagan 80% of the time. J.C. Busterna, and K.A. Hansen, "Presidential Endorsement Patterns by Chain-Owned Papers, 1976–84," <i>Journalism Quarterly</i>, Summer 1990, Vol. 67 Issue 2, pp 286–294</li>
<li id="cite_note-98"><b><a href="#cite_ref-98">^</a></b> Richard Vetter, "Wall Street Journal," in Frohnen, ed. <i>American Conservatism</i> pp 898–99</li>
<li id="cite_note-Kicker-99"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Kicker_99-0">^</a></b> Troy Kicker, "The Conservative Manifesto", <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.northcarolinahistory.org/encyclopedia/12/entry">North Carolina History project</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-100"><b><a href="#cite_ref-100">^</a></b> Merrill D. Peterson, <i>The Jefferson image in the American mind</i> (1960) pp 355–79</li>
<li id="cite_note-101"><b><a href="#cite_ref-101">^</a></b> William McGurn, "The Witness of Whittaker Chambers: A Bitter Hope," <i>Modern Age, Spring/Summer 1984, Vol. 28 Issue 2/3, pp 203–207</i></li>
<li id="cite_note-102"><b><a href="#cite_ref-102">^</a></b> Robert A. Divine, "The Cold War and the Election of 1948," <i>Journal of American History,</i> June 1972, Vol. 59 Issue 1, pp 90–110 <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.jstor.org/pss/1888388">in JSTOR</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-103"><b><a href="#cite_ref-103">^</a></b> Martin Halpern, "Taft-Hartley and the Defeat of the Progressive Alternative in the United Auto Workers," <i>Labor History,</i> Spring 1986, Vol. 27 Issue 2, pp 204–26</li>
<li id="cite_note-104"><b><a href="#cite_ref-104">^</a></b> Lou Cannon, <i>President Reagan: the role of a lifetime</i> (2000) p. 245</li>
<li id="cite_note-105"><b><a href="#cite_ref-105">^</a></b> Jack A. Samosky, "Congressman Noah Morgan Mason: Illinois' Conservative Spokesman," <i>Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society,</i> March 1983, Vol. 76 Issue 1, pp 35-48</li>
<li id="cite_note-106"><b><a href="#cite_ref-106">^</a></b> Most analysts agreed that war without Congressional approval was a "costly mistake." Robert J. Donovan, <i>Tumultuous Years: The Presidency of Harry S. Truman, 1949–1953</i> (1982), ch 23; Taft quote on p. 220</li>
<li id="cite_note-107"><b><a href="#cite_ref-107">^</a></b> William F. Buckley and L. Brent Bozell, <i>Mccarthy and His Enemies: The Record and Its Meaning</i> (1954)</li>
<li id="cite_note-108"><b><a href="#cite_ref-108">^</a></b> Arthur Herman, <i>Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator</i> (1999) p 324</li>
<li id="cite_note-109"><b><a href="#cite_ref-109">^</a></b> Roger Chapman, ed. <i>Culture wars: an encyclopedia of issues, viewpoints, and voices</i> (2010) Volume 1 p. 112</li>
<li id="cite_note-110"><b><a href="#cite_ref-110">^</a></b> Kim Phillips-Fein, "Conservatism: A State of the Field," <i>Journal of American History,</i> (Dec. 2011) 98#3 pp 723-743, quote p. 729</li>
<li id="cite_note-111"><b><a href="#cite_ref-111">^</a></b> George H. Nash, <i>The Conservative Intellectual Tradition since 1945</i> (1976)</li>
<li id="cite_note-112"><b><a href="#cite_ref-112">^</a></b> James Patterson, <i>Grand Expectations: The United States, 1945–1974</i> (1997) pp 271–73</li>
<li id="cite_note-113"><b><a href="#cite_ref-113">^</a></b> David W. Reinhard, <i>Republican Right since 1945</i> (1983) p 110</li>
<li id="cite_note-114"><b><a href="#cite_ref-114">^</a></b> Russell Kirk, <i>The Conservative Mind</i> (1950), pp 423–424.</li>
<li id="cite_note-115"><b><a href="#cite_ref-115">^</a></b> Russell Kirk, <i>Libertarians: the Chirping Sectaries</i> in <i>The Essential Russell Kirk</i>, ISI Books, 2007, <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/9781933859026" class="internal mw-magiclink-isbn">ISBN 978-1-933859-02-6</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-116"><b><a href="#cite_ref-116">^</a></b> John B. Judis, <i>William F. Buckley, Jr.: Patron Saint of the Conservatives</i> (1990) full-scale biography by liberal journalist.</li>
<li id="cite_note-117"><b><a href="#cite_ref-117">^</a></b> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/flashback/flashback200501030730.asp">Our Mission Statement</a>, <i>National Review Online</i>, November 19, 1955.</li>
<li id="cite_note-118"><b><a href="#cite_ref-118">^</a></b> Bruce J. Caldwell, <i>Hayek's Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F.A. Hayek</i> (2005) p 297</li>
<li id="cite_note-119"><b><a href="#cite_ref-119">^</a></b> Martha Derthick and Paul J. Quirk, <i>The Politics of Deregulation</i> (1985)</li>
<li id="cite_note-120"><b><a href="#cite_ref-120">^</a></b> Gordon, John Steele. "A Short History Of DEBT." <i>American History</i> 46.4 (Oct. 2011): 58-63. <i>Academic Search Premier.</i> Web. 29 Dec. 2011.</li>
<li id="cite_note-121"><b><a href="#cite_ref-121">^</a></b> Johan van Overtveldt, <i>The Chicago School: How the University of Chicago assembled the Thinkers Who Revolutionized Economics and Business</i> (2007) p 85</li>
<li id="cite_note-122"><b><a href="#cite_ref-122">^</a></b> Alan O. Ebenstein, <i>Milton Friedman: A Biography</i> (2009) p 181</li>
<li id="cite_note-123"><b><a href="#cite_ref-123">^</a></b> Allitt, <i>The Conservatives</i> pp 183–87</li>
<li id="cite_note-124"><b><a href="#cite_ref-124">^</a></b> Patrick Minford, ed. <i>Money matters</i> (2004) p 125</li>
<li id="cite_note-125"><b><a href="#cite_ref-125">^</a></b> Ross B. Emmett, <i>Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics</i> (2010) p 95</li>
<li id="cite_note-126"><b><a href="#cite_ref-126">^</a></b> David Wessel, <i>In Fed We Trust: Ben Bernanke's War on the Great Panic</i> (2010) ch 14</li>
<li id="cite_note-127"><b><a href="#cite_ref-127">^</a></b> Schoenwald, (2001) pp. 83–91. Some chapters without Welch's approval did organize opposition to fluoridation of local water supplies or pushed a slate for election to local school boards.</li>
<li id="cite_note-128"><b><a href="#cite_ref-128">^</a></b> Jody Carlson, <i>George C. Wallace and the politics of powerlessness: the Wallace campaigns for the Presidency, 1964-1976</i> (1981) p 237</li>
<li id="cite_note-129"><b><a href="#cite_ref-129">^</a></b> Dan T. Carter. <i>The politics of rage: George Wallace, the origins of the new conservatism, and the transformation of American politics</i>, LSU Press, 2000. pg. 12.</li>
<li id="cite_note-130"><b><a href="#cite_ref-130">^</a></b> Linda Bridges and John R. Coyne, <i>Strictly Right: William F. Buckley, Jr. and the American conservative movement</i> (2007) p 115</li>
<li id="cite_note-131"><b><a href="#cite_ref-131">^</a></b> Lloyd Earl Rohler <i>George Wallace: conservative populist</i> Greenwood Publishing Group, (2004) pg. 60.</li>
<li id="cite_note-132"><b><a href="#cite_ref-132">^</a></b> Stephan Lesher, <i>George Wallace: American Populist</i> (1995) p 15</li>
<li id="cite_note-133"><b><a href="#cite_ref-133">^</a></b> Jeff Frederick, <i>Stand Up for Alabama: Governor George C. Wallace</i> (2007)</li>
<li id="cite_note-134"><b><a href="#cite_ref-134">^</a></b> "Governor George Wallace," <i>Playboy</i>, November 1964</li>
<li id="cite_note-135"><b><a href="#cite_ref-135">^</a></b> Rossiter, <i>Conservatism in America</i> (1968) p. 268</li>
<li id="cite_note-136"><b><a href="#cite_ref-136">^</a></b> Barry Morris Goldwater. <i>With no apologies</i> (1979)</li>
<li id="cite_note-137"><b><a href="#cite_ref-137">^</a></b> John Kenneth White, <i>Still seeing red: how the Cold War shapes the new American politics</i> (1998) p 138</li>
<li id="cite_note-138"><b><a href="#cite_ref-138">^</a></b> Lisa McGirr, <i>Suburban Warriors: The Origins of the New American Right</i> (2002) p. 173</li>
<li id="cite_note-139"><b><a href="#cite_ref-139">^</a></b> Douglas Hartmann, et al., "One (Multicultural) Nation Under God? Changing Uses and Meanings of the Term "Judeo-Christian" in the American Media," <i>Journal of Media &amp; Religion,</i> 2005, Vol. 4 Issue 4, pp 207–234</li>
<li id="cite_note-140"><b><a href="#cite_ref-140">^</a></b> Axel R. Schafer, <i>Countercultural Conservatives: American Evangelicalism From the Postwar Revival to the New Christian Right</i> (University of Wisconsin Press; 2011).</li>
<li id="cite_note-141"><b><a href="#cite_ref-141">^</a></b> Clyde Wilcox and Carin Robinson, <i>Onward Christian Soldiers?: The Religious Right in American Politics</i> (2010) p. 13</li>
<li id="cite_note-142"><b><a href="#cite_ref-142">^</a></b> Donald T. Critchlow, ed. <i>The politics of abortion and birth control in historical perspective</i> (1996)</li>
<li id="cite_note-143"><b><a href="#cite_ref-143">^</a></b> Laurie Goodstein, "Bishops Say Rules on Gay Parents Limit Freedom of Religion," <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/us/for-bishops-a-battle-over-whose-rights-prevail.html?hpw"><i>New York Times</i> Dec. 28, 2011 online</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-144"><b><a href="#cite_ref-144">^</a></b> Wald, Alan M. 1987. The New York Intellectuals. The Rise and Decline of the Anti-Stalinist Left from the 1930s to the 1980s. The University of North Carolina Press <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://books.google.com/books?id=mzlsL5s0GXYC&amp;dq=1934+new+york+hotel+strike+field&amp;q=fieldites#v=onepage&amp;q=fieldites&amp;f=false">http://books.google.com/books?id=mzlsL5s0GXYC&amp;dq=1934+new+york+hotel+strike+field&amp;q=fieldites#v=onepage&amp;q=fieldites&amp;f=false</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-145"><b><a href="#cite_ref-145">^</a></b> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://reclaimdemocracy.org/corporate_accountability/powell_memo_lewis.html">Powell, Lewis F., "Attack on the American Free Enterprise System."</a> 1971 memorandum to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce,</li>
<li id="cite_note-146"><b><a href="#cite_ref-146">^</a></b> Niels Bjerre-Poulsen, "The Heritage Foundation: A Second-Generation Think Tank," <i>Journal of Policy History,</i> Apr 1991, Vol. 3 Issue 2, pp 152-172</li>
<li id="cite_note-147"><b><a href="#cite_ref-147">^</a></b> Murray L. Weidenbaum, <i>The Competition of Ideas: The World of the Washington Think Tanks</i> (2011)</li>
<li id="cite_note-148"><b><a href="#cite_ref-148">^</a></b> Alice O'Connor, "Bringing the Market Back In: Philanthropic Activism and Conservative Reform," Clemens, Elisabeth S., and Doug Guthrie, eds., <i>Politics and Partnerships: The Role of Voluntary Associations in America's Political Past and Present</i> (University of Chicago Press, 2010) pp. 121-50</li>
<li id="cite_note-149"><b><a href="#cite_ref-149">^</a></b> Jennifer DeForest, "Conservatism Goes to College: The Role of Philanthropic Foundations in the Rise of Conservative Student Networks," <i>Perspectives on the History of Higher Education,</i> 2007, Vol. 26, p103-127,</li>
<li id="cite_note-150"><b><a href="#cite_ref-150">^</a></b> Laura Kalman, <i>Right Star Rising: A New Politics, 1974–1980</i> (2010) details the collapse one by one of alternatives to Reagan.</li>
<li id="cite_note-151"><b><a href="#cite_ref-151">^</a></b> <span class="citation news">Madrick, Jeff (2011-12-09). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/11/books/review/back-to-work-why-we-need-smart-government-for-a-strong-economy-by-bill-clinton-book-review.html?pagewanted=all">"What Bill Clinton Would Do"</a>. <i>New York Times</i><span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/11/books/review/back-to-work-why-we-need-smart-government-for-a-strong-economy-by-bill-clinton-book-review.html?pagewanted=all">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/11/books/review/back-to-work-why-we-need-smart-government-for-a-strong-economy-by-bill-clinton-book-review.html?pagewanted=all</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 2012-01-26</span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.atitle=What+Bill+Clinton+Would+Do&amp;rft.jtitle=New+York+Times&amp;rft.aulast=Madrick&amp;rft.aufirst=Jeff&amp;rft.au=Madrick%2C%26%2332%3BJeff&amp;rft.date=2011-12-09&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2011%2F12%2F11%2Fbooks%2Freview%2Fback-to-work-why-we-need-smart-government-for-a-strong-economy-by-bill-clinton-book-review.html%3Fpagewanted%3Dall&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-case_780-152"><b><a href="#cite_ref-case_780_152-0">^</a></b> Case, Karl E. &amp; Fair, Ray C. (1999). <i>Principles of Economics</i> (5th ed.), p. 780. Prentice-Hall. <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/0139619054" class="internal mw-magiclink-isbn">ISBN 0-13-961905-4</a>.</li>
<li id="cite_note-153"><b><a href="#cite_ref-153">^</a></b> <span class="citation Journal">Bartlett, Bruce. <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://web.uconn.edu/cunningham/econ309/lafferpdf.pdf">"Supply-Side Economics: "Voodoo Economics" or Lasting Contribution?"</a> (PDF). <i>Laffer Associates</i> (November 11, 2003)<span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://web.uconn.edu/cunningham/econ309/lafferpdf.pdf">http://web.uconn.edu/cunningham/econ309/lafferpdf.pdf</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 2008-11-17</span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.atitle=Supply-Side+Economics%3A+%22Voodoo+Economics%22+or+Lasting+Contribution%3F&amp;rft.jtitle=Laffer+Associates&amp;rft.aulast=Bartlett&amp;rft.aufirst=Bruce&amp;rft.au=Bartlett%2C%26%2332%3BBruce&amp;rft.issue=November+11%2C+2003&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.uconn.edu%2Fcunningham%2Fecon309%2Flafferpdf.pdf&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-154"><b><a href="#cite_ref-154">^</a></b> Donald T. Critchlow, <i>Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism: A Woman's Crusade</i> (2005)</li>
<li id="cite_note-155"><b><a href="#cite_ref-155">^</a></b> Steven F. Hayward, <i>The Age of Reagan: The Conservative Counterrevolution 1980–1989</i> (2009), 625–32. Liberals say that Gorbachev ended the Cold War as the Soviet Union collapsed. Conservatives counter that Reagan's heavy pressure (such as "Star Wars") caused the collapse. Stephen G. Brooks, and William Wohlforth, "Clarifying the End of Cold War Debate," <i>Cold War History</i> 2007 7(3): 447–454</li>
<li id="cite_note-156"><b><a href="#cite_ref-156">^</a></b> Reason Magazine, 1975-07-01</li>
<li id="cite_note-157"><b><a href="#cite_ref-157">^</a></b> Ronald Reagan, <i>Reagan in His Own Hand</i> (2001), p. 14, 232, 359</li>
<li id="cite_note-158"><b><a href="#cite_ref-158">^</a></b> Quoted in <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,964979,00.html#ixzz0nMC1PLmF"><i>Time</i> July 13, 1987</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-159"><b><a href="#cite_ref-159">^</a></b> Hayward, <i>The Age of Reagan</i> p.52</li>
<li id="cite_note-160"><b><a href="#cite_ref-160">^</a></b> Hayward, <i>The Age of Reagan</i> pp. 26, 52–54; Lou Cannon. <i>President Reagan: TheRole of a Lifetime</i> (1991) 118, 480–1.</li>
<li id="cite_note-biggov_conservatives-161"><b><a href="#cite_ref-biggov_conservatives_161-0">^</a></b> <span class="citation book">Tanner, Michael (2007). <i>Leviathan on the Right: how big-government conservatism brought down the Republican revolution</i>. Cato Institute. <a href="/wiki/International_Standard_Book_Number" title="International Standard Book Number">ISBN</a>&#160;<a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-1-933-99500-7" title="Special:BookSources/978-1-933-99500-7">978-1-933-99500-7</a>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Leviathan+on+the+Right%3A+how+big-government+conservatism+brought+down+the+Republican+revolution&amp;rft.aulast=Tanner&amp;rft.aufirst=Michael&amp;rft.au=Tanner%2C%26%2332%3BMichael&amp;rft.date=2007&amp;rft.pub=Cato+Institute&amp;rft.isbn=978-1-933-99500-7&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-162"><b><a href="#cite_ref-162">^</a></b> The World Almanac and Book of Facts, 2009, <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/1600571050" class="internal mw-magiclink-isbn">ISBN 1600571050</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-163"><b><a href="#cite_ref-163">^</a></b> The Real Reagan Economic Record, 2001, <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2001/03/the-real-reagan-economic-record">http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2001/03/the-real-reagan-economic-record</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-164"><b><a href="#cite_ref-164">^</a></b> Supply Side Tax Cuts and The Truth About the Reagan Record, 1996, <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-261.html">https://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-261.html</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-CNN_2004_Exit_Poll-165">^ <a href="#cite_ref-CNN_2004_Exit_Poll_165-0"><sup><i><b>a</b></i></sup></a> <a href="#cite_ref-CNN_2004_Exit_Poll_165-1"><sup><i><b>b</b></i></sup></a> See <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html">CNN 2004 Exit Poll</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-166"><b><a href="#cite_ref-166">^</a></b> <span class="citation news">Carl Hulse (26 September 2008). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/business/27repubs.html?ref=business">"Conservatives Viewed Bailout Plan as Last Straw"</a>. <i><a href="/wiki/New_York_Times" title="New York Times" class="mw-redirect">New York Times</a></i><span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/business/27repubs.html?ref=business">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/business/27repubs.html?ref=business</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 17 January 2012</span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.atitle=Conservatives+Viewed+Bailout+Plan+as+Last+Straw&amp;rft.jtitle=%5B%5BNew+York+Times%5D%5D&amp;rft.aulast=Carl+Hulse&amp;rft.au=Carl+Hulse&amp;rft.date=26+September+2008&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2008%2F09%2F27%2Fbusiness%2F27repubs.html%3Fref%3Dbusiness&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-167"><b><a href="#cite_ref-167">^</a></b> <a href="/wiki/William_F._Buckley" title="William F. Buckley" class="mw-redirect">William F. Buckley</a>, <i><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/22/eveningnews/main1826838.shtml">Buckley: Bush Not a True Conservative</a></i>, July 22, 2006, Retrieved from cbsnews.com August 25, 2009.</li>
<li id="cite_note-168"><b><a href="#cite_ref-168">^</a></b> Carl M. Cannon, <i>Reagan's Disciple</i> (PublicAffairs, 2008) p xii.</li>
<li id="cite_note-169"><b><a href="#cite_ref-169">^</a></b> Daniel J. Balz and Haynes Johnson, <i>The Battle for America 2008: The Story of an Extraordinary Election</i> (2009); ch 26 is "Palinmania"; ch 27, on the economy is "Collapse"</li>
<li id="cite_note-170"><b><a href="#cite_ref-170">^</a></b> Jonathan Alter, <i>The Promise: President Obama, Year One</i> (2010)</li>
<li id="cite_note-171"><b><a href="#cite_ref-171">^</a></b> see <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html#polls">RealClear Politics summary</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-172"><b><a href="#cite_ref-172">^</a></b> Rich Lowry, "A Victory for America," <i>National Review Online</i> May 3, 2011</li>
<li id="cite_note-173"><b><a href="#cite_ref-173">^</a></b> Michael Barone, "To Get Bin Laden, Obama Relied on Policies He Decried" <i>National Review Online</i> May 5, 2011</li>
<li id="cite_note-174"><b><a href="#cite_ref-174">^</a></b> See <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/23/AR2010102304000.html?wpisrc=nl_cuzhead">online Amy Gardner, "Gauging the scope of the tea party movement in America," <i>Washington Post</i> Oct. 24, 2010</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-175"><b><a href="#cite_ref-175">^</a></b> Kate Zernike, <i>Boiling Mad: Inside Tea Party America</i> (2010), by a <i>New York Times</i> reporter</li>
<li id="cite_note-176"><b><a href="#cite_ref-176">^</a></b> Scott Rasmussen and Doug Schoen, <i>Mad As Hell: How the Tea Party Movement Is Fundamentally Remaking Our Two-Party System</i> (2010) pp 169–82</li>
<li id="cite_note-177"><b><a href="#cite_ref-177">^</a></b> Scott Rasmussen and Doug Schoen. <i>Mad As Hell: How the Tea Party Movement Is Fundamentally Remaking Our Two-Party System</i> (2010) pp 154</li>
<li id="cite_note-178"><b><a href="#cite_ref-178">^</a></b> Kate Zernike, "Tea Party Set to Win Enough Races for Wide Influence," <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/15/us/politics/15teaparty.html?_r=1&amp;hp"><i>New York Times</i> Oct. 14, 2010</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-179"><b><a href="#cite_ref-179">^</a></b> Jonathan Karl and Gregory Simmons, "'Contract' 2.0: House Republicans Roll Out 'A Pledge to America'" <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/contract-20-house-republicans-roll-pledge-america/story?id=11702807">ABC News Sept. 23, 2010</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-Salant1-180"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Salant1_180-0">^</a></b> "Americans who describe themselves as Tea Party supporters are largely Republican, conservative and angry at the government, a New York Times/CBS News poll shows."<span class="citation news">Salant, Jonathan D. (April 15, 2010). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-15/tea-party-backers-conservative-angry-at-washington-poll-shows.html">"Tea Party Backers Conservative, Angry at Washington, Poll Shows"</a>. <i><a href="/wiki/Bloomberg_Businessweek" title="Bloomberg Businessweek">Bloomberg Businessweek</a></i><span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-15/tea-party-backers-conservative-angry-at-washington-poll-shows.html">http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-15/tea-party-backers-conservative-angry-at-washington-poll-shows.html</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 2 November 2010</span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.atitle=Tea+Party+Backers+Conservative%2C+Angry+at+Washington%2C+Poll+Shows&amp;rft.jtitle=%5B%5BBloomberg+Businessweek%5D%5D&amp;rft.aulast=Salant&amp;rft.aufirst=Jonathan+D.&amp;rft.au=Salant%2C%26%2332%3BJonathan+D.&amp;rft.date=April+15%2C+2010&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessweek.com%2Fnews%2F2010-04-15%2Ftea-party-backers-conservative-angry-at-washington-poll-shows.html&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-181"><b><a href="#cite_ref-181">^</a></b> "On most of these topics, supporters of the Tea Party movement are angrier than any of the other groups," according to the BBC World News America/Harris Poll of Oct. 2010. "What Are We Most Angry About? The Economy, Unemployment, the Government, Taxes and Immigration: Tea Party supporters are angrier than Republicans, who are angrier than Democrats", Harris Interactive, <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.harrisinteractive.com/NewsRoom/HarrisPolls/tabid/447/mid/1508/articleId/592/ctl/ReadCustom%20Default/Default.aspx">Oct. 21, 2010</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-WPangry-182"><b><a href="#cite_ref-WPangry_182-0">^</a></b> "Marketing consultants say the ad [for <a href="/wiki/Dodge" title="Dodge">Dodge</a> cars using tea-party style patriotic symbolism] is one indication that the movement's anger and energy have become part of the cultural conversation, making it a natural target for admakers."<span class="citation news">Gardner, Amy (July 6, 2010). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/05/AR2010070502843.html">"Tea party movement's energy, anger make it target for admakers"</a>. <i><a href="/wiki/Washington_Post" title="Washington Post" class="mw-redirect">Washington Post</a></i><span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/05/AR2010070502843.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/05/AR2010070502843.html</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 2 November 2010</span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.atitle=Tea+party+movement%27s+energy%2C+anger+make+it+target+for+admakers&amp;rft.jtitle=%5B%5BWashington+Post%5D%5D&amp;rft.aulast=Gardner&amp;rft.aufirst=Amy&amp;rft.au=Gardner%2C%26%2332%3BAmy&amp;rft.date=July+6%2C+2010&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2010%2F07%2F05%2FAR2010070502843.html&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-Zernike-183"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Zernike_183-0">^</a></b> "The widest gulfs between Tea Party supporters and others—Republicans and the public in general—are in their responses to questions about social issues, from gay marriage to abortion to immigration to global warming."<span class="citation news">Zernike, Kate (April 17, 2010). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/18/weekinreview/18zernike.html">"Tea Party Supporters Doing Fine, but Angry Nonetheless"</a>. <i><a href="/wiki/New_York_Times" title="New York Times" class="mw-redirect">New York Times</a></i><span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/18/weekinreview/18zernike.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/18/weekinreview/18zernike.html</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 2 November 2010</span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.atitle=Tea+Party+Supporters+Doing+Fine%2C+but+Angry+Nonetheless&amp;rft.jtitle=%5B%5BNew+York+Times%5D%5D&amp;rft.aulast=Zernike&amp;rft.aufirst=Kate&amp;rft.au=Zernike%2C%26%2332%3BKate&amp;rft.date=April+17%2C+2010&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2010%2F04%2F18%2Fweekinreview%2F18zernike.html&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-184"><b><a href="#cite_ref-184">^</a></b> the <i>New York Times</i> says, "But as the Tea Party infuses conservatism with new energy, its leaders deliberately avoid discussion of issues like gay marriage or abortion." Kate Zernike, <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/us/politics/13tea.html">"Tea Party Avoids Divisive Social Issues," <i>New York Times</i> March 12, 2010</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-185"><b><a href="#cite_ref-185">^</a></b> According to the <i>New York Times,</i> "a review of the Web sites of many Tea Party candidates suggests that they have not spent much time exploring foreign policy specifics. Many do little more than offer blanket promises to keep America safe." Michael D. Shear, "Tea Party Foreign Policy a Bit Cloudy" <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/21/tea-party-foreign-policy-a-bit-cloudy/"><i>New York Times</i> Oct. 21, 2010</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-WeekSt-186"><b><a href="#cite_ref-WeekSt_186-0">^</a></b> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/print/articles/two-faces-tea-party">The Two Faces of the Tea Party</a> by <a href="/wiki/Matthew_Continetti" title="Matthew Continetti">Matthew Continetti</a>, <i><a href="/wiki/The_Weekly_Standard" title="The Weekly Standard">The Weekly Standard</a></i>, Vol. 15, No. 39, June 28, 2010</li>
<li id="cite_note-187"><b><a href="#cite_ref-187">^</a></b> "Conservative Enthusiasm Surging Compared to Previous Midterms" <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://2010central.gallup.com/2010/04/conservative-enthusiasm-surging.html"><i>Gallup: 2010 Central</i> April 23, 2010</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-188"><b><a href="#cite_ref-188">^</a></b> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Neo-conservatives/list">"List of prominent neoconservatives,"</a> Sourcewatch.org.</li>
<li id="cite_note-189"><b><a href="#cite_ref-189">^</a></b> Samuel P. Huntington, "The Clash of Civilizations," <i>Foreign Affairs</i> Summer 1993, v72, n3, p22-50, <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.alamut.com/subj/economics/misc/clash.html">online version</a>.</li>
<li id="cite_note-190"><b><a href="#cite_ref-190">^</a></b> <span class="citation web"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.nhinet.org/burke.htm">"The Value-Centered Historicism of Edmund Burke"</a>. <a href="/wiki/National_Humanities_Institute" title="National Humanities Institute">National Humanities Institute</a>. 2010-07-29<span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.nhinet.org/burke.htm">http://www.nhinet.org/burke.htm</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 2012-01-06</span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.btitle=The+Value-Centered+Historicism+of+Edmund+Burke&amp;rft.atitle=&amp;rft.date=2010-07-29&amp;rft.pub=%5B%5BNational+Humanities+Institute%5D%5D&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nhinet.org%2Fburke.htm&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-191"><b><a href="#cite_ref-191">^</a></b> Grover Cleveland, "The President's message, 1887" (1887) <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://books.google.com/books?id=4cApAAAAYAAJ&amp;pg=PA37&amp;dq=%22unnecessary+taxation+is+unjust+taxation%22+Grover+OR+Cleveland&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=wQnkTePyOOfeiAKJ0Y2TBg&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=6&amp;ved=0CEAQ6AEwBTgK">online p 37</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-192"><b><a href="#cite_ref-192">^</a></b> John Callaghan, <i>The Cold War and the March of Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy</i>, <i>Contemporary British History,</i> Autumn 2001, Vol. 15 Issue 3, pp 1–25</li>
<li id="cite_note-193"><b><a href="#cite_ref-193">^</a></b> National Geographic, September 2007.</li>
<li id="cite_note-194"><b><a href="#cite_ref-194">^</a></b> Richard Hofstadter, <i>Anti-Intellectualism in American Life</i>, p. 407, Vintage, 1966, <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780394703176" class="internal mw-magiclink-isbn">ISBN 978-0394703176</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-195"><b><a href="#cite_ref-195">^</a></b> Schuman and Zelizer, eds. <i>Rightward Bound</i> (2008) p 158; Allitt, <i>Conservatives,</i> pp 178, 241</li>
<li id="cite_note-196"><b><a href="#cite_ref-196">^</a></b> Darren Dochuk, <i>From Bible Belt to Sun Belt: Plain-Folk Religion, Grassroots Politics, and the Rise of Evangelical Conservatism</i> (W.W. Norton &amp; Company; 2010) shows how migrants to Southern California from Oklahoma, Texas, and Arkansas provided evangelical support for social conservatism.</li>
<li id="cite_note-197"><b><a href="#cite_ref-197">^</a></b> Steven F. Hayward, <i>The Age of Reagan: The Conservative Counterrevolution 1980–1989</i> (2009), pp. 477</li>
<li id="cite_note-198"><b><a href="#cite_ref-198">^</a></b> Chris Edwards, "Reagan's Budget Legacy," <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.cato.org/research/articles/edwards-040608.html"><i>CATO Institute</i> June 8, 2004</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-Moseley-199"><b><a href="#cite_ref-Moseley_199-0">^</a></b> <span class="citation Journal">Moseley, Daniel (June 25, 2011). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1872578">"What is Libertarianism?"</a>. <i>Basic Income Studies</i> <b>6</b> (2): 2<span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=1872578">http://ssrn.com/abstract=1872578</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 15 November 2011</span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.atitle=What+is+Libertarianism%3F&amp;rft.jtitle=Basic+Income+Studies&amp;rft.aulast=Moseley&amp;rft.aufirst=Daniel&amp;rft.au=Moseley%2C%26%2332%3BDaniel&amp;rft.date=June+25%2C+2011&amp;rft.volume=6&amp;rft.issue=2&amp;rft.pages=2&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fssrn.com%2Fabstract%3D1872578&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-200"><b><a href="#cite_ref-200">^</a></b> <span class="citation web">Boaz, David; David Kirby (January 21, 2010). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/libertarian-vote-age-obama">"The Libertarian Vote in the Age of Obama"</a>. <i>Policy Analysis</i>. Cato Institute<span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/libertarian-vote-age-obama">http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/libertarian-vote-age-obama</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 24 February 2012</span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.btitle=The+Libertarian+Vote+in+the+Age+of+Obama&amp;rft.atitle=Policy+Analysis&amp;rft.aulast=Boaz&amp;rft.aufirst=David&amp;rft.au=Boaz%2C%26%2332%3BDavid&amp;rft.date=January+21%2C+2010&amp;rft.pub=Cato+Institute&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cato.org%2Fpublications%2Fpolicy-analysis%2Flibertarian-vote-age-obama&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-201"><b><a href="#cite_ref-201">^</a></b> The term "neoliberalism" is usually used by the left in negative fashion to attack free market policies.</li>
<li id="cite_note-202"><b><a href="#cite_ref-202">^</a></b> <span class="citation web"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.princeton.edu/~rvdb/JAVA/election2004/">"The changing colors of America (1960–2004)"</a>. 2004-11-10<span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.princeton.edu/~rvdb/JAVA/election2004/">http://www.princeton.edu/~rvdb/JAVA/election2004/</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 2012-01-06</span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.btitle=The+changing+colors+of+America+%281960%E2%80%932004%29&amp;rft.atitle=&amp;rft.date=2004-11-10&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.princeton.edu%2F%7Ervdb%2FJAVA%2Felection2004%2F&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-203"><b><a href="#cite_ref-203">^</a></b> <span class="citation web"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.burntorangereport.com/archives/001449.html">"The Self-Segregation of America into Red and Blue"</a>. Burntorangereport.com. 2004-04-27<span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.burntorangereport.com/archives/001449.html">http://www.burntorangereport.com/archives/001449.html</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 2012-01-06</span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.btitle=The+Self-Segregation+of+America+into+Red+and+Blue&amp;rft.atitle=&amp;rft.date=2004-04-27&amp;rft.pub=Burntorangereport.com&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.burntorangereport.com%2Farchives%2F001449.html&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-204"><b><a href="#cite_ref-204">^</a></b> Russello, Gerald J., 1996, "The Jurisprudence of Russell Kirk," <i>Modern Age</i> 38: 354–63. Issn: 0026-7457</li>
<li id="cite_note-205"><b><a href="#cite_ref-205">^</a></b> <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.robertsgriffin.com/ConservBookshelf.pdf">Book Review</a> by Robert S. Griffin of Chilton Williamson, Jr., <i>The Conservative Bookshelf: Essential Works That Impact Today’s Conservative Thinkers</i>, <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://robertsgriffin.com">robertsgriffin.com</a>.</li>
<li id="cite_note-206"><b><a href="#cite_ref-206">^</a></b> Stephen Goode, <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.thomasaquinas.edu/news/pressroom/inthenews/other/books_faith.html">Higher Education: Uniting the Great Books and Faith</a> (August 2, 2004), Thomas Aquinas College.</li>
<li id="cite_note-207"><b><a href="#cite_ref-207">^</a></b> Lewis L. Gould, <i>The William Howard Taft Presidency</i> (2009) p 175</li>
<li id="cite_note-208"><b><a href="#cite_ref-208">^</a></b> Mark A. Graber and Michael Perhac, <i>Marbury versus Madison: documents and commentary</i> (2002) p 111</li>
<li id="cite_note-209"><b><a href="#cite_ref-209">^</a></b> Jeff Shesol, <i>Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court</i> (2010) p 525</li>
<li id="cite_note-210"><b><a href="#cite_ref-210">^</a></b> Graber and Perhac, <i>Marbury versus Madison: documents and commentary</i> (2002) p114</li>
<li id="cite_note-211"><b><a href="#cite_ref-211">^</a></b> Mark V. Tushnet, <i>A Court Divided: The Rehnquist Court and the Future of Constitutional Law</i> (2005) p 338</li>
<li id="cite_note-212"><b><a href="#cite_ref-212">^</a></b> Johnathan O'Neill, <i>Originalism in American law and politics: a constitutional history</i> (2005) pp 7–11, 208</li>
<li id="cite_note-213"><b><a href="#cite_ref-213">^</a></b> <span class="citation news">Tom Zeller Jr. (20 October 2011). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/20/republican-environment_n_1020633.html">"Republican Environmental Group Seeks To Put Conservation Back On The Conservative Agenda"</a>. <i>Huffington Post</i><span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/20/republican-environment_n_1020633.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/20/republican-environment_n_1020633.html</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 24 December 2011</span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.genre=article&amp;rft.atitle=Republican+Environmental+Group+Seeks+To+Put+Conservation+Back+On+The+Conservative+Agenda&amp;rft.jtitle=Huffington+Post&amp;rft.aulast=Tom+Zeller+Jr.&amp;rft.au=Tom+Zeller+Jr.&amp;rft.date=20+October+2011&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffingtonpost.com%2F2011%2F10%2F20%2Frepublican-environment_n_1020633.html&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-214"><b><a href="#cite_ref-214">^</a></b> Robert Paehlke, <i>Conservation and environmentalism: an encyclopedia</i> (1995) p. 675</li>
<li id="cite_note-215"><b><a href="#cite_ref-215">^</a></b> Aaron M. McCright and Riley E. Dunlap, "Challenging Global Warming as a Social Problem: An Analysis of the Conservative Movement's Counter-Claims," <i>Social Problems,</i> Nov 2000, Vol. 47 Issue 4, pp 499-522 <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.jstor.org/pss/3097132">in JSTOR</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-216"><b><a href="#cite_ref-216">^</a></b> William Safire, <i>Safire's political dictionary</i> (2008) pp. 175–76</li>
<li id="cite_note-217"><b><a href="#cite_ref-217">^</a></b> Robert Taft, <i>The Papers of Robert A. Taft,</i> edited by Clarence E. Wunderlin, Jr., (2003), 3:313.</li>
<li id="cite_note-218"><b><a href="#cite_ref-218">^</a></b> William Safire, <i>Safire's political dictionary</i> (2008) pp. 18, 157</li>
<li id="cite_note-219"><b><a href="#cite_ref-219">^</a></b> Donald T. Critchlow, <i>The conservative ascendancy: how the GOP right made political history</i> (2007) p. 43</li>
<li id="cite_note-220"><b><a href="#cite_ref-220">^</a></b> Jeremy M. Peters, "'Anybody but Mitt,'" <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/20/sunday-review/can-conservative-media-stop-mitt-romney.html?_r=1&amp;ref=politics"><i>New York Times</i> Nov. 19, 2011</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-221"><b><a href="#cite_ref-221">^</a></b> <span class="citation web"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/23/house-republicans-defend-conservative-commentators-decry-white-house-feud/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%25253A+foxnews%25252Fpolitics+%28Text+-+Politics%29">"House Republicans Defend Conservative Commentators, Decry White House Feud"</a>. Fox News. 2010-04-07<span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/23/house-republicans-defend-conservative-commentators-decry-white-house-feud/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%25253A+foxnews%25252Fpolitics+%28Text+-+Politics%29">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/23/house-republicans-defend-conservative-commentators-decry-white-house-feud/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%25253A+foxnews%25252Fpolitics+%28Text+-+Politics%29</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 2012-01-06</span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.btitle=House+Republicans+Defend+Conservative+Commentators%2C+Decry+White+House+Feud&amp;rft.atitle=&amp;rft.date=2010-04-07&amp;rft.pub=Fox+News&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fpolitics%2F2009%2F10%2F23%2Fhouse-republicans-defend-conservative-commentators-decry-white-house-feud%2F%3Futm_source%3Dfeedburner%26utm_medium%3Dfeed%26utm_campaign%3DFeed%2525253A%2Bfoxnews%2525252Fpolitics%2B%2528Text%2B-%2BPolitics%2529&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-222"><b><a href="#cite_ref-222">^</a></b> <span class="citation web">Frum, David (November 20, 2011). <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://nymag.com/print/?/news/politics/conservatives-david-frum-2011-11/index2.html">"When Did the GOP Lose Touch With Reality?"</a>. <i><a href="/wiki/New_York_(magazine)" title="New York (magazine)">New York</a></i><span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://nymag.com/print/?/news/politics/conservatives-david-frum-2011-11/index2.html">http://nymag.com/print/?/news/politics/conservatives-david-frum-2011-11/index2.html</a></span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=bookitem&amp;rft.btitle=When+Did+the+GOP+Lose+Touch+With+Reality%3F&amp;rft.atitle=%5B%5BNew+York+%28magazine%29%7CNew+York%5D%5D&amp;rft.aulast=Frum&amp;rft.aufirst=David&amp;rft.au=Frum%2C%26%2332%3BDavid&amp;rft.date=November+20%2C+2011&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fnymag.com%2Fprint%2F%3F%2Fnews%2Fpolitics%2Fconservatives-david-frum-2011-11%2Findex2.html&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-223"><b><a href="#cite_ref-223">^</a></b> <span class="citation book"><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://books.google.com/books?id=GWgdn-U_kRcC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;pg=PA1#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false"><i>Arthur Aughey, et al., ''The conservative political tradition in Britain and the United States'' (1992), pp. 1–2</i></a>. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press<span class="printonly">. <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://books.google.com/books?id=GWgdn-U_kRcC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;pg=PA1#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false">http://books.google.com/books?id=GWgdn-U_kRcC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;pg=PA1#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false</a></span><span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved 2012-01-06</span>.</span><span class="Z3988" title="ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&amp;rft.genre=book&amp;rft.btitle=Arthur+Aughey%2C+et+al.%2C+%27%26%2339%3BThe+conservative+political+tradition+in+Britain+and+the+United+States%27%26%2339%3B+%281992%29%2C+pp.+1%E2%80%932&amp;rft.pub=Fairleigh+Dickinson+Univ+Press&amp;rft_id=http%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DGWgdn-U_kRcC%26lpg%3DPP1%26pg%3DPA1%23v%3Donepage%26q%3D%26f%3Dfalse&amp;rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"><span style="display: none;">&#160;</span></span></li>
<li id="cite_note-224"><b><a href="#cite_ref-224">^</a></b> Louis Hartz, <i>The Liberal Tradition in America</i> (1955), p. 17</li>
<li id="cite_note-225"><b><a href="#cite_ref-225">^</a></b> Rainer-Olaf Schultze et al., <i>Conservative parties and right-wing politics in North America</i> (2003), <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://books.google.com/books?id=9bkFRFdl4bQC&amp;pg=PA5&amp;dq=intitle:Conservative+intitle:parties+intitle:and+intitle:right-wing+intitle:politics+intitle:in+intitle:North&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=yydJToz0C_H_sQLt-OWSCA&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false">p. 15 online</a></li>
<li id="cite_note-226"><b><a href="#cite_ref-226">^</a></b> <i>The Conservative Illusion</i> (1959), M. Morton Auerbach</li>
<li id="cite_note-227"><b><a href="#cite_ref-227">^</a></b> <i>The radical right</i>, (2000–2002) ed. Daniel Bell, p. 75</li>
<li id="cite_note-228"><b><a href="#cite_ref-228">^</a></b> <a rel="nofollow" class="external autonumber" href="http://www.americanheritage.com/content/giants-american-conservatism">[1]</a>, Clinton Rossiter, "The Giants of American Conservatism," <i>American Heritage</i> 1955 6(6): 56–59, 94–96]</li>
</ol>
</div>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=68" title="Edit section: Further reading">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="Further_reading">Further reading</span></h2>
<div class="rellink relarticle mainarticle">Main article: <a href="/wiki/Bibliography_of_conservatism_in_the_United_States" title="Bibliography of conservatism in the United States">Bibliography of conservatism in the United States</a></div>
<ul>
<li>Allitt, Patrick. <i>The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities Throughout American History</i> (2010) <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0300164181">excerpt and text search</a></li>
<li>Critchlow, Donald T. <i>The Conservative Ascendancy: How the Republican Right Rose to Power in Modern America</i> (2nd ed. 2011)</li>
<li>Filler, Louis. <i>Dictionary of American Conservatism</i> (<a href="/wiki/Philosophical_Library" title="Philosophical Library">Philosophical Library</a>, 1987)</li>
<li>Frohnen, Bruce et al. eds. <i>American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia</i> (2006) <a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/1932236449" class="internal mw-magiclink-isbn">ISBN 1-932236-44-9</a>, the most detailed reference</li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Paul_Gottfried" title="Paul Gottfried">Gottfried, Paul</a>. <i>The Conservative Movement</i> Twayne, 1993.</li>
<li>Guttman, Allan. <i>The Conservative Tradition in America</i> Oxford University Press, 1967.</li>
<li>Hayward, Steven F. <i>The Age of Reagan: The Conservative Counterrevolution 1980–1989 (2009) <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1400053579">excerpt and text search</a></i></li>
<li>Lora, Ronald.; <i>The Conservative Press in Twentieth-Century America</i> Greenwood Press, 1999 <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;d=26257429">online edition</a></li>
<li>Lyons, Paul. <i>American Conservatism: Thinking It, Teaching It.</i> (Vanderbilt University Press, 2009). 202 pp.&#160;<a href="/wiki/Special:BookSources/9780826516268" class="internal mw-magiclink-isbn">ISBN 978-0-8265-1626-8</a></li>
<li>Nash, George. <i>The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945</i> (2006; 1st ed. 1978) influential history</li>
<li>Phillips-Fein, Kim. "Conservatism: A State of the Field," <i>Journal of American History,</i> (Dec. 2011) 98#3 pp 723-743</li>
<li>Schneider, Gregory. <i>The Conservative Century: From Reaction to Revolution</i> (2009)</li>
<li>Thorne, Melvin J. <i>American Conservative Thought since World War II: The Core Ideas</i> (1990) <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.questia.com/read/27255773">online edition</a></li>
</ul>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit&amp;section=69" title="Edit section: External links">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="External_links">External links</span></h2>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.heritage.org/research/lecture/the-origins-of-the-modern-american-conservative-movement">"The Origins of the Modern American Conservative Movement,"</a> <a href="/wiki/Heritage_Foundation" title="Heritage Foundation" class="mw-redirect">Heritage Foundation</a>.</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.cerium.ca/article2211.html">"Conservative Predominance in the U.S.: A Moment or an Era?"</a>, 21 experts from the U.S. and abroad, ponder the future of conservatism.</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/cgi-local/DHI/dhi.cgi?id=dv1-60"><i>Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Conservatism</i> at the University of Virginia</a>.</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.oah.org/pubs/magazine/conservatism/dickson.html">"Comparative Decades: Conservatism in the 1920s and 1980s" Lesson plans</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://markriebling.blogs.com/sources_and_methods/a-cr.html">Mark Riebling, "Prospectus for a Critique of Conservative Reason."</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://www.vdare.com/gottfried/041104_kirk.htm">Paul Gottfried, "How Russell Kirk (And The Right) Went Wrong"</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://photo.newsweek.com/2010/4/conservative-reactionary-movements.html">A History of Conservative Movements</a> – slideshow by <i><a href="/wiki/Newsweek_magazine" title="Newsweek magazine" class="mw-redirect">Newsweek magazine</a></i></li>
</ul>
<table cellspacing="0" class="navbox" style="border-spacing:0;;">
<tr>
<td style="padding:2px;">
<table cellspacing="0" class="nowraplinks collapsible expand navbox-inner" style="border-spacing:0;background:transparent;color:inherit;;">
<tr>
<th scope="col" style=";" class="navbox-title" colspan="2">
<div class="noprint plainlinks hlist navbar mini" style="">
<ul>
<li class="nv-view"><a href="/wiki/Template:North_America_topic" title="Template:North America topic"><span title="View this template" style=";;background:none transparent;border:none;">v</span></a></li>
<li class="nv-talk"><a href="/wiki/Template_talk:North_America_topic" title="Template talk:North America topic"><span title="Discuss this template" style=";;background:none transparent;border:none;">t</span></a></li>
<li class="nv-edit"><a class="external text" href="//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:North_America_topic&amp;action=edit"><span title="Edit this template" style=";;background:none transparent;border:none;">e</span></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="" style="font-size:110%;"><a href="/wiki/Conservatism_in_North_America" title="Conservatism in North America">Conservatism in North America</a></div>
</th>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px;">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style=";padding:0.35em 1.0em; line-height:1.1em;;">Sovereign states</th>
<td style="text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;width:100%;padding:0px;font-size:0.95em;;;" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist">
<div style="padding:0em 0.25em">
<ul>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Antigua_and_Barbuda&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Antigua and Barbuda (page does not exist)">Antigua and Barbuda</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_Bahamas&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in the Bahamas (page does not exist)">Bahamas</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Barbados&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Barbados (page does not exist)">Barbados</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Conservatism_in_Belize" title="Conservatism in Belize" class="mw-redirect">Belize</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Conservatism_in_Canada" title="Conservatism in Canada">Canada</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Costa_Rica&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Costa Rica (page does not exist)">Costa Rica</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Conservatism_in_Cuba" title="Conservatism in Cuba" class="mw-redirect">Cuba</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Dominica&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Dominica (page does not exist)">Dominica</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_Dominican_Republic&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in the Dominican Republic (page does not exist)">Dominican Republic</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_El_Salvador&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in El Salvador (page does not exist)">El Salvador</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Grenada&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Grenada (page does not exist)">Grenada</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Conservatism_in_Guatemala" title="Conservatism in Guatemala" class="mw-redirect">Guatemala</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Haiti&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Haiti (page does not exist)">Haiti</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Honduras&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Honduras (page does not exist)">Honduras</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Jamaica&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Jamaica (page does not exist)">Jamaica</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Conservatism_in_Mexico" title="Conservatism in Mexico" class="mw-redirect">Mexico</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Nicaragua&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Nicaragua (page does not exist)">Nicaragua</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Conservatism_in_Panama" title="Conservatism in Panama" class="mw-redirect">Panama</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Saint_Kitts_and_Nevis&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Saint Kitts and Nevis (page does not exist)">Saint Kitts and Nevis</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Saint_Lucia&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Saint Lucia (page does not exist)">Saint Lucia</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Saint_Vincent_and_the_Grenadines&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (page does not exist)">Saint Vincent and the Grenadines</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Trinidad_and_Tobago&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Trinidad and Tobago (page does not exist)">Trinidad and Tobago</a></li>
<li><strong class="selflink">United States</strong></li>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style=";padding:0.35em 1.0em; line-height:1.1em;;">Dependencies and<br />
other territories</th>
<td style="text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;width:100%;padding:0px;font-size:0.95em;;;" class="navbox-list navbox-even hlist">
<div style="padding:0em 0.25em">
<ul>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Anguilla&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Anguilla (page does not exist)">Anguilla</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Aruba&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Aruba (page does not exist)">Aruba</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Bermuda&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Bermuda (page does not exist)">Bermuda</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Bonaire&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Bonaire (page does not exist)">Bonaire</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_British_Virgin_Islands&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in the British Virgin Islands (page does not exist)">British Virgin Islands</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_Cayman_Islands&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in the Cayman Islands (page does not exist)">Cayman Islands</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Cura%C3%A7ao&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Curaçao (page does not exist)">Curaçao</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Greenland&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Greenland (page does not exist)">Greenland</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Guadeloupe&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Guadeloupe (page does not exist)">Guadeloupe</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Martinique&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Martinique (page does not exist)">Martinique</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Montserrat&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Montserrat (page does not exist)">Montserrat</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Puerto_Rico&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Puerto Rico (page does not exist)">Puerto Rico</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Saint_Barth%C3%A9lemy&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Saint Barthélemy (page does not exist)">Saint Barthélemy</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_Collectivity_of_Saint_Martin&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in the Collectivity of Saint Martin (page does not exist)">Saint Martin</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Saint_Pierre_and_Miquelon&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Saint Pierre and Miquelon (page does not exist)">Saint Pierre and Miquelon</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Saba&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Saba (page does not exist)">Saba</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Sint_Eustatius&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Sint Eustatius (page does not exist)">Sint Eustatius</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_Sint_Maarten&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in Sint Maarten (page does not exist)">Sint Maarten</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_Turks_and_Caicos_Islands&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in the Turks and Caicos Islands (page does not exist)">Turks and Caicos Islands</a></li>
<li><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States_Virgin_Islands&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" class="new" title="Conservatism in the United States Virgin Islands (page does not exist)">United States Virgin Islands</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table cellspacing="0" class="navbox" style="border-spacing:0;;">
<tr>
<td style="padding:2px;">
<table cellspacing="0" class="nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner" style="border-spacing:0;background:transparent;color:inherit;;">
<tr>
<th scope="col" style=";background:#3A5FCD; padding-bottom:0; font-weight:normal; color:white;" class="navbox-title" colspan="3">
<div class="noprint plainlinks hlist navbar mini" style="">
<ul>
<li class="nv-view"><a href="/wiki/Template:Conservatism" title="Template:Conservatism"><span title="View this template" style=";background:#3A5FCD; padding-bottom:0; font-weight:normal; color:white;;background:none transparent;border:none;">v</span></a></li>
<li class="nv-talk"><a href="/wiki/Template_talk:Conservatism" title="Template talk:Conservatism"><span title="Discuss this template" style=";background:#3A5FCD; padding-bottom:0; font-weight:normal; color:white;;background:none transparent;border:none;">t</span></a></li>
<li class="nv-edit"><a class="external text" href="//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Conservatism&amp;action=edit"><span title="Edit this template" style=";background:#3A5FCD; padding-bottom:0; font-weight:normal; color:white;;background:none transparent;border:none;">e</span></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="" style="font-size:110%;"><a href="/wiki/Conservatism" title="Conservatism"><span style="color:white">Conservatism</span></a></div>
</th>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px;">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style=";padding:0.35em 1.0em; line-height:1.1em; background:white;;">Schools</th>
<td style="text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;width:100%;padding:0px;padding:0.25em 0; line-height:1.4em;;;" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist">
<div style="padding:0em 0.25em">
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/Cultural_conservatism" title="Cultural conservatism">Cultural</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Fiscal_conservatism" title="Fiscal conservatism">Fiscal</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Green_conservatism" title="Green conservatism">Green</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Liberal_conservatism" title="Liberal conservatism">Liberal</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Libertarian_conservatism" title="Libertarian conservatism">Libertarian</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/National_conservatism" title="National conservatism">National</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Neoconservatism" title="Neoconservatism">Neoconservatism</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Paleoconservatism" title="Paleoconservatism">Paleoconservatism</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Progressive_conservatism" title="Progressive conservatism">Progressive</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Social_conservatism" title="Social conservatism">Social</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Traditionalist_conservatism" title="Traditionalist conservatism">Traditionalist</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
<td class="navbox-image" style="width:0%;padding:0px 0px 0px 2px;padding:0.4em 0 0.4em;" rowspan="13">
<div><a href="/wiki/File:DodgerBlue_flag_waving.svg" class="image" title="Blue flag"><img alt="Blue flag" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/DodgerBlue_flag_waving.svg/70px-DodgerBlue_flag_waving.svg.png" width="70" height="75" /></a></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style=";padding:0.35em 1.0em; line-height:1.1em; background:white;;">Concepts</th>
<td style="text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;width:100%;padding:0px;padding:0.25em 0; line-height:1.4em;;;" class="navbox-list navbox-even hlist">
<div style="padding:0em 0.25em">
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/Tradition" title="Tradition">Tradition</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Norm_(social)" title="Norm (social)">Social norm</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Natural_Law" title="Natural Law" class="mw-redirect">Natural Law</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Family_values" title="Family values">Family Values</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Social_order" title="Social order">Social Order</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Social_stratification" title="Social stratification">Social Hierarchy</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Private_property" title="Private property">Private Property</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style=";padding:0.35em 1.0em; line-height:1.1em; background:white;;">History</th>
<td style="text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;width:100%;padding:0px;padding:0.25em 0; line-height:1.4em;;;" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist">
<div style="padding:0em 0.25em">
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/Timeline_of_conservatism" title="Timeline of conservatism" class="mw-redirect">Timeline</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style=";padding:0.35em 1.0em; line-height:1.1em; background:white;;">People</th>
<td style="text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;width:100%;padding:0px;padding:0.25em 0; line-height:1.4em;;;" class="navbox-list navbox-even hlist">
<div style="padding:0em 0.25em">
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/Edmund_Burke" title="Edmund Burke">Edmund Burke</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Joseph_de_Maistre" title="Joseph de Maistre">Joseph de Maistre</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Louis_Gabriel_Ambroise_de_Bonald" title="Louis Gabriel Ambroise de Bonald">Louis Bonald</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois-Ren%C3%A9_de_Chateaubriand" title="François-René de Chateaubriand">François Chateaubriand</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Klemens_von_Metternich" title="Klemens von Metternich">Klemens von Metternich</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Adam_M%C3%BCller" title="Adam Müller">Adam Müller</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Juan_Donoso_Cort%C3%A9s" title="Juan Donoso Cortés">Juan Donoso Cortés</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Hippolyte_Taine" title="Hippolyte Taine">Hippolyte Taine</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Benjamin_Disraeli" title="Benjamin Disraeli">Benjamin Disraeli</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Konstantin_Leontiev" title="Konstantin Leontiev">Konstantin Leontiev</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Winston_Churchill" title="Winston Churchill">Winston Churchill</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Oswald_Spengler" title="Oswald Spengler">Oswald Spengler</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/George_Santayana" title="George Santayana">George Santayana</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Carl_Schmitt" title="Carl Schmitt">Carl Schmitt</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Peter_Viereck" title="Peter Viereck">Peter Viereck</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Michael_Oakeshott" title="Michael Oakeshott">Michael Oakeshott</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Roger_Scruton" title="Roger Scruton">Roger Scruton</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Russell_Kirk" title="Russell Kirk">Russell Kirk</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Ronald_Reagan" title="Ronald Reagan">Ronald Reagan</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style=";padding:0.35em 1.0em; line-height:1.1em; background:white;;">Organizations</th>
<td style="text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;width:100%;padding:0px;padding:0.25em 0; line-height:1.4em;;;" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist">
<div style="padding:0em 0.25em">
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/International_Democrat_Union" title="International Democrat Union">International Democrat Union</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/International_Young_Democrat_Union" title="International Young Democrat Union">International Young Democrat Union</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Asia_Pacific_Democrat_Union" title="Asia Pacific Democrat Union">Asia Pacific Democrat Union</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Alliance_of_European_Conservatives_and_Reformists" title="Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists">Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/European_Democrats" title="European Democrats">European Democrats</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/European_People%27s_Party" title="European People's Party">European People's Party</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/List_of_conservative_parties" title="List of conservative parties">List of conservative parties</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style=";padding:0.35em 1.0em; line-height:1.1em; background:white;;">Religious</th>
<td style="text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;width:100%;padding:0px;padding:0.25em 0; line-height:1.4em;;;" class="navbox-list navbox-even hlist">
<div style="padding:0em 0.25em">
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/Christian_Right" title="Christian Right" class="mw-redirect">Christian Right</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Jewish_Right" title="Jewish Right" class="mw-redirect">Jewish Right</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Hindu_Nationalism" title="Hindu Nationalism" class="mw-redirect">Hindu Nationalism</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Islamism" title="Islamism">Islamism</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Traditionalist_Catholics" title="Traditionalist Catholics" class="mw-redirect">Traditionalist Catholics</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style=";padding:0.35em 1.0em; line-height:1.1em; background:white;;">Related topics</th>
<td style="text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;width:100%;padding:0px;padding:0.25em 0; line-height:1.4em;;;" class="navbox-list navbox-odd hlist">
<div style="padding:0em 0.25em">
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/Reactionary" title="Reactionary">Reactionary</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Counter-revolutionary" title="Counter-revolutionary">Counter-revolutionary</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Centre-right" title="Centre-right">Centre-right</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Right-wing_politics" title="Right-wing politics">Right-wing politics</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Tory" title="Tory">Toryism</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Carlism" title="Carlism">Carlism</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Aristocracy" title="Aristocracy">Aristocracy</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Capitalism" title="Capitalism">Capitalism</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/New_Right" title="New Right">New Right</a></li>
<li><a href="/wiki/Neo-liberalism" title="Neo-liberalism" class="mw-redirect">Neo-liberalism</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px;">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="navbox-abovebelow hlist" style=";background: white; font-weight: bold" colspan="3">
<div>
<ul>
<li><a href="/wiki/Portal:Conservatism" title="Portal:Conservatism"><img alt="DodgerBlue flag waving.svg" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/DodgerBlue_flag_waving.svg/16px-DodgerBlue_flag_waving.svg.png" width="16" height="17" /></a> <a href="/wiki/Portal:Conservatism" title="Portal:Conservatism">Conservatism Portal</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table cellspacing="0" class="navbox" style="border-spacing:0;;">
<tr>
<td style="padding:2px;">
<table cellspacing="0" class="nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner" style="border-spacing:0;background:transparent;color:inherit;;">
<tr>
<th scope="col" style=";" class="navbox-title" colspan="3">
<div class="noprint plainlinks hlist navbar mini" style="">
<ul>
<li class="nv-view"><a href="/wiki/Template:American_social_conservatism" title="Template:American social conservatism"><span title="View this template" style=";;background:none transparent;border:none;">v</span></a></li>
<li class="nv-talk"><a href="/wiki/Template_talk:American_social_conservatism" title="Template talk:American social conservatism"><span title="Discuss this template" style=";;background:none transparent;border:none;">t</span></a></li>
<li class="nv-edit"><a class="external text" href="//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:American_social_conservatism&amp;action=edit"><span title="Edit this template" style=";;background:none transparent;border:none;">e</span></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="" style="font-size:110%;"><a href="/wiki/Social_conservatism_in_the_United_States" title="Social conservatism in the United States">Social conservatism in the United States</a></div>
</th>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px;">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style=";;">Issues</th>
<td style="text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;width:100%;padding:0px;padding:0.25em 0; line-height:1.4em;;;" class="navbox-list navbox-odd">
<div style="padding:0em 0.25em"><span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Pro-life" title="Pro-life" class="mw-redirect">Pro-life</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Family_values" title="Family values">Family values</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Anti-pornography_movement_in_the_United_States" title="Anti-pornography movement in the United States">Anti-pornography movement</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/School_prayer" title="School prayer">School prayer</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Homosexual_agenda" title="Homosexual agenda">Homosexual agenda</a> &#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Drug_prohibition" title="Drug prohibition" class="mw-redirect">Drug prohibition</a></span></div>
</td>
<td class="navbox-image" style="width:0%;padding:0px 0px 0px 2px;" rowspan="11">
<div><a href="/wiki/File:P_social_sciences.png" class="image"><img alt="P social sciences.png" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5e/P_social_sciences.png" width="100" height="88" /></a></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style=";;">People</th>
<td style="text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;width:100%;padding:0px;padding:0.25em 0; line-height:1.4em;;;" class="navbox-list navbox-even">
<div style="padding:0em 0.25em"><span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Mike_Huckabee" title="Mike Huckabee">Mike Huckabee</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Jerry_Falwell" title="Jerry Falwell">Jerry Falwell</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Pat_Buchanan" title="Pat Buchanan">Pat Buchanan</a> &#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/William_Bennett" title="William Bennett">William Bennett</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/William_F._Buckley,_Jr." title="William F. Buckley, Jr.">William F. Buckley, Jr.</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Robert_P._George" title="Robert P. George">Robert P. George</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Sarah_Palin" title="Sarah Palin">Sarah Palin</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh" title="Rush Limbaugh">Rush Limbaugh</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/James_Dobson" title="James Dobson">James Dobson</a></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style=";;">Organizations</th>
<td style="text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;width:100%;padding:0px;padding:0.25em 0; line-height:1.4em;;;" class="navbox-list navbox-odd">
<div style="padding:0em 0.25em"><span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/American_Family_Association" title="American Family Association">American Family Association</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Moral_Majority" title="Moral Majority">Moral Majority</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Morality_in_Media" title="Morality in Media">Morality in Media</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/National_Right_to_Life_Committee" title="National Right to Life Committee">National Right to Life Committee</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Concerned_Women_for_America" title="Concerned Women for America">Concerned Women for America</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/American_Life_League" title="American Life League">American Life League</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Alliance_Defense_Fund" title="Alliance Defense Fund">Alliance Defense Fund</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Focus_on_the_Family" title="Focus on the Family">Focus on the Family</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/American_Decency_Association" title="American Decency Association">American Decency Association</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/National_Organization_for_Marriage" title="National Organization for Marriage">National Organization for Marriage</a></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style=";;">Think tanks</th>
<td style="text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;width:100%;padding:0px;padding:0.25em 0; line-height:1.4em;;;" class="navbox-list navbox-even">
<div style="padding:0em 0.25em"><span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Family_Research_Council" title="Family Research Council">Family Research Council</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Eagle_Forum" title="Eagle Forum">Eagle Forum</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Heritage_Foundation" title="Heritage Foundation" class="mw-redirect">Heritage Foundation</a></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style=";;">Political parties</th>
<td style="text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;width:100%;padding:0px;padding:0.25em 0; line-height:1.4em;;;" class="navbox-list navbox-odd">
<div style="padding:0em 0.25em"><span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)" title="Republican Party (United States)">Republican Party</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Constitution_Party_(United_States)" title="Constitution Party (United States)">Constitution Party</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Prohibition_Party" title="Prohibition Party">Prohibition Party</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/America_First_Party_(2002)" title="America First Party (2002)">America First Party</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/America%27s_Independent_Party" title="America's Independent Party" class="mw-redirect">America's Independent Party</a></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row" class="navbox-group" style=";;">See also</th>
<td style="text-align:left;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;width:100%;padding:0px;padding:0.25em 0; line-height:1.4em;;;" class="navbox-list navbox-even">
<div style="padding:0em 0.25em"><span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Paleoconservatism" title="Paleoconservatism">Paleoconservatism</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Christian_Right" title="Christian Right" class="mw-redirect">Christian Right</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Manhattan_Declaration:_A_Call_of_Christian_Conscience" title="Manhattan Declaration: A Call of Christian Conscience">Manhattan Declaration</a>&#160;<b>·</b></span> <span class="nowrap"><a href="/wiki/Culture_War" title="Culture War" class="mw-redirect">Culture War</a></span></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:2px;">
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="navbox-abovebelow" style=";" colspan="3">
<div><b><a href="/wiki/Portal:Conservatism" title="Portal:Conservatism"><img alt="DodgerBlue flag waving.svg" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/DodgerBlue_flag_waving.svg/16px-DodgerBlue_flag_waving.svg.png" width="16" height="17" /></a> <a href="/wiki/Portal:Conservatism" title="Portal:Conservatism">Conservatism Portal</a></b></div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>


<!-- 
NewPP limit report
Preprocessor node count: 23252/1000000
Post-expand include size: 235451/2048000 bytes
Template argument size: 102114/2048000 bytes
Expensive parser function count: 14/500
-->

<!-- Saved in parser cache with key enwiki:pcache:idhash:2298740-0!*!0!!en!4!* and timestamp 20120227230104 generated by mw24 -->
</div>				<!-- /bodycontent -->
								<!-- printfooter -->
				<div class="printfooter">
				Retrieved from "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;oldid=478771784">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;oldid=478771784</a>"				</div>
				<!-- /printfooter -->
												<!-- catlinks -->
				<div id='catlinks' class='catlinks'><div id="mw-normal-catlinks"><a href="/wiki/Special:Categories" title="Special:Categories">Categories</a>: <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Category:Conservatism_in_the_United_States" title="Category:Conservatism in the United States">Conservatism in the United States</a></li></ul></div><div id="mw-hidden-catlinks" class="mw-hidden-cats-hidden">Hidden categories: <ul><li><a href="/wiki/Category:All_pages_needing_factual_verification" title="Category:All pages needing factual verification">All pages needing factual verification</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_factual_verification_from_September_2011" title="Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification from September 2011">Wikipedia articles needing factual verification from September 2011</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:All_articles_with_unsourced_statements" title="Category:All articles with unsourced statements">All articles with unsourced statements</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:Articles_with_unsourced_statements_from_November_2011" title="Category:Articles with unsourced statements from November 2011">Articles with unsourced statements from November 2011</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:Articles_needing_additional_references_from_September_2010" title="Category:Articles needing additional references from September 2010">Articles needing additional references from September 2010</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:All_articles_needing_additional_references" title="Category:All articles needing additional references">All articles needing additional references</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:Articles_with_unsourced_statements_from_September_2010" title="Category:Articles with unsourced statements from September 2010">Articles with unsourced statements from September 2010</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:Articles_with_unsourced_statements_from_June_2010" title="Category:Articles with unsourced statements from June 2010">Articles with unsourced statements from June 2010</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:Articles_needing_cleanup_from_August_2011" title="Category:Articles needing cleanup from August 2011">Articles needing cleanup from August 2011</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:All_pages_needing_cleanup" title="Category:All pages needing cleanup">All pages needing cleanup</a></li><li><a href="/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_laundry_list_cleanup_from_August_2011" title="Category:Wikipedia laundry list cleanup from August 2011">Wikipedia laundry list cleanup from August 2011</a></li></ul></div></div>				<!-- /catlinks -->
												<div class="visualClear"></div>
				<!-- debughtml -->
								<!-- /debughtml -->
			</div>
			<!-- /bodyContent -->
		</div>
		<!-- /content -->
		<!-- header -->
		<div id="mw-head" class="noprint">
			
<!-- 0 -->
<div id="p-personal" class="">
	<h5>Personal tools</h5>
	<ul>
		<li id="pt-login"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&amp;returnto=Conservatism+in+the+United+States" title="You are encouraged to log in; however, it is not mandatory. [o]" accesskey="o">Log in / create account</a></li>
	</ul>
</div>

<!-- /0 -->
			<div id="left-navigation">
				
<!-- 0 -->
<div id="p-namespaces" class="vectorTabs">
	<h5>Namespaces</h5>
	<ul>
					<li  id="ca-nstab-main" class="selected"><span><a href="/wiki/Conservatism_in_the_United_States"  title="View the content page [c]" accesskey="c">Article</a></span></li>
					<li  id="ca-talk"><span><a href="/wiki/Talk:Conservatism_in_the_United_States"  title="Discussion about the content page [t]" accesskey="t">Talk</a></span></li>
			</ul>
</div>

<!-- /0 -->

<!-- 1 -->
<div id="p-variants" class="vectorMenu emptyPortlet">
		<h5><span>Variants</span><a href="#"></a></h5>
	<div class="menu">
		<ul>
					</ul>
	</div>
</div>

<!-- /1 -->
			</div>
			<div id="right-navigation">
				
<!-- 0 -->
<div id="p-views" class="vectorTabs">
	<h5>Views</h5>
	<ul>
					<li id="ca-view" class="selected"><span><a href="/wiki/Conservatism_in_the_United_States" >Read</a></span></li>
					<li id="ca-edit"><span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=edit"  title="You can edit this page. &#10;Please use the preview button before saving. [e]" accesskey="e">Edit</a></span></li>
					<li id="ca-history" class="collapsible"><span><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;action=history"  title="Past versions of this page [h]" accesskey="h">View history</a></span></li>
			</ul>
</div>

<!-- /0 -->

<!-- 1 -->
<div id="p-cactions" class="vectorMenu emptyPortlet">
	<h5><span>Actions</span><a href="#"></a></h5>
	<div class="menu">
		<ul>
					</ul>
	</div>
</div>

<!-- /1 -->

<!-- 2 -->
<div id="p-search">
	<h5><label for="searchInput">Search</label></h5>
	<form action="/w/index.php" id="searchform">
		<input type='hidden' name="title" value="Special:Search"/>
				<div id="simpleSearch">
						<input type="text" name="search" value="" title="Search Wikipedia [f]" accesskey="f" id="searchInput" />						<button type="submit" name="button" title="Search Wikipedia for this text" id="searchButton"><img src="//bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.18/vector/images/search-ltr.png?303-4" alt="Search" /></button>					</div>
			</form>
</div>

<!-- /2 -->
			</div>
		</div>
		<!-- /header -->
		<!-- panel -->
			<div id="mw-panel" class="noprint">
				<!-- logo -->
					<div id="p-logo"><a style="background-image: url(//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/bc/Wiki.png);" href="/wiki/Main_Page"  title="Visit the main page"></a></div>
				<!-- /logo -->
				
<!-- navigation -->
<div class="portal" id='p-navigation'>
	<h5>Navigation</h5>
	<div class="body">
		<ul>
			<li id="n-mainpage-description"><a href="/wiki/Main_Page" title="Visit the main page [z]" accesskey="z">Main page</a></li>
			<li id="n-contents"><a href="/wiki/Portal:Contents" title="Guides to browsing Wikipedia">Contents</a></li>
			<li id="n-featuredcontent"><a href="/wiki/Portal:Featured_content" title="Featured content – the best of Wikipedia">Featured content</a></li>
			<li id="n-currentevents"><a href="/wiki/Portal:Current_events" title="Find background information on current events">Current events</a></li>
			<li id="n-randompage"><a href="/wiki/Special:Random" title="Load a random article [x]" accesskey="x">Random article</a></li>
			<li id="n-sitesupport"><a href="//wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Special:Landingcheck?landing_page=WMFJA085&amp;language=en&amp;utm_source=donate&amp;utm_medium=sidebar&amp;utm_campaign=20101204SB002" title="Support us">Donate to Wikipedia</a></li>
		</ul>
	</div>
</div>

<!-- /navigation -->

<!-- SEARCH -->

<!-- /SEARCH -->

<!-- interaction -->
<div class="portal" id='p-interaction'>
	<h5>Interaction</h5>
	<div class="body">
		<ul>
			<li id="n-help"><a href="/wiki/Help:Contents" title="Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia">Help</a></li>
			<li id="n-aboutsite"><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:About" title="Find out about Wikipedia">About Wikipedia</a></li>
			<li id="n-portal"><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_portal" title="About the project, what you can do, where to find things">Community portal</a></li>
			<li id="n-recentchanges"><a href="/wiki/Special:RecentChanges" title="A list of recent changes in the wiki [r]" accesskey="r">Recent changes</a></li>
			<li id="n-contact"><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us" title="How to contact Wikipedia">Contact Wikipedia</a></li>
		</ul>
	</div>
</div>

<!-- /interaction -->

<!-- TOOLBOX -->
<div class="portal" id='p-tb'>
	<h5>Toolbox</h5>
	<div class="body">
		<ul>
			<li id="t-whatlinkshere"><a href="/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Conservatism_in_the_United_States" title="List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [j]" accesskey="j">What links here</a></li>
			<li id="t-recentchangeslinked"><a href="/wiki/Special:RecentChangesLinked/Conservatism_in_the_United_States" title="Recent changes in pages linked from this page [k]" accesskey="k">Related changes</a></li>
			<li id="t-upload"><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:Upload" title="Upload files [u]" accesskey="u">Upload file</a></li>
			<li id="t-specialpages"><a href="/wiki/Special:SpecialPages" title="A list of all special pages [q]" accesskey="q">Special pages</a></li>
			<li id="t-permalink"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;oldid=478771784" title="Permanent link to this revision of the page">Permanent link</a></li>
<li id="t-cite"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Special:Cite&amp;page=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;id=478771784" title="Information on how to cite this page">Cite this page</a></li>		</ul>
	</div>
</div>

<!-- /TOOLBOX -->

<!-- coll-print_export -->
<div class="portal" id='p-coll-print_export'>
	<h5>Print/export</h5>
	<div class="body">
		<ul id="collectionPortletList"><li id="coll-create_a_book"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Special:Book&amp;bookcmd=book_creator&amp;referer=Conservatism+in+the+United+States" title="Create a book or page collection" rel="nofollow">Create a book</a></li><li id="coll-download-as-rl"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Special:Book&amp;bookcmd=render_article&amp;arttitle=Conservatism+in+the+United+States&amp;oldid=478771784&amp;writer=rl" title="Download a PDF version of this wiki page" rel="nofollow">Download as PDF</a></li><li id="t-print"><a href="/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;printable=yes" title="Printable version of this page [p]" accesskey="p">Printable version</a></li></ul>	</div>
</div>

<!-- /coll-print_export -->

<!-- LANGUAGES -->
<div class="portal" id='p-lang'>
	<h5>Languages</h5>
	<div class="body">
		<ul>
			<li class="interwiki-es"><a href="//es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservadurismo_en_los_Estados_Unidos">Español</a></li>
			<li class="interwiki-it"><a href="//it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservatorismo_negli_Stati_Uniti_d%27America">Italiano</a></li>
			<li class="interwiki-nl"><a href="//nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amerikaans_conservatisme">Nederlands</a></li>
			<li class="interwiki-no"><a href="//no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amerikansk_konservatisme">‪Norsk (bokmål)‬</a></li>
			<li class="interwiki-simple"><a href="//simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservatives_in_the_United_States">Simple English</a></li>
			<li class="interwiki-yi"><a href="//yi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%A7%D7%90%D7%A0%D7%A1%D7%A2%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%95%D7%90%D7%98%D7%99%D7%96%D7%9D_%D7%90%D7%99%D7%9F_%D7%93%D7%99_%D7%A4%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%99%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%92%D7%98%D7%A2_%D7%A9%D7%98%D7%90%D7%98%D7%9F">ייִדיש</a></li>
		</ul>
	</div>
</div>

<!-- /LANGUAGES -->
			</div>
		<!-- /panel -->
		<!-- footer -->
		<div id="footer">
							<ul id="footer-info">
											<li id="footer-info-lastmod"> This page was last modified on 25 February 2012 at 13:39.<br /></li>
											<li id="footer-info-copyright">Text is available under the <a rel="license" href="//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License</a><a rel="license" href="//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/" style="display:none;"></a>;
additional terms may apply.
See <a href="//wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_use">Terms of use</a> for details.<br/>
Wikipedia&reg; is a registered trademark of the <a href="//www.wikimediafoundation.org/">Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.</a>, a non-profit organization.<br /></li><li class="noprint"><a class='internal' href="//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us">Contact us</a></li>
									</ul>
							<ul id="footer-places">
											<li id="footer-places-privacy"><a href="//wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Privacy_policy" title="wikimedia:Privacy policy">Privacy policy</a></li>
											<li id="footer-places-about"><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:About" title="Wikipedia:About">About Wikipedia</a></li>
											<li id="footer-places-disclaimer"><a href="/wiki/Wikipedia:General_disclaimer" title="Wikipedia:General disclaimer">Disclaimers</a></li>
											<li id="footer-places-mobileview"><a href='/w/index.php?title=Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;useformat=mobile' class='noprint'>Mobile view</a></li>
									</ul>
										<ul id="footer-icons" class="noprint">
					<li id="footer-copyrightico">
						<a href="//wikimediafoundation.org/"><img src="//bits.wikimedia.org/images/wikimedia-button.png" width="88" height="31" alt="Wikimedia Foundation"/></a>
					</li>
					<li id="footer-poweredbyico">
						<a href="//www.mediawiki.org/"><img src="//bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.18/common/images/poweredby_mediawiki_88x31.png" alt="Powered by MediaWiki" width="88" height="31" /></a>
					</li>
				</ul>
						<div style="clear:both"></div>
		</div>
		<!-- /footer -->
		<!-- fixalpha -->
		<script type="text/javascript"> if ( window.isMSIE55 ) fixalpha(); </script>
		<!-- /fixalpha -->
		<script src="//bits.wikimedia.org/en.wikipedia.org/load.php?debug=false&amp;lang=en&amp;modules=skins.vector&amp;only=scripts&amp;skin=vector&amp;*" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">if ( window.mediaWiki ) {
	mw.loader.load(["mediawiki.user", "mediawiki.util", "mediawiki.page.ready", "mediawiki.legacy.wikibits", "mediawiki.legacy.ajax", "mediawiki.legacy.mwsuggest", "ext.gadget.teahouse", "ext.gadget.wmfFR2011Style", "ext.vector.collapsibleNav", "ext.vector.collapsibleTabs", "ext.vector.editWarning", "ext.vector.simpleSearch", "ext.UserBuckets", "ext.articleFeedback.startup", "ext.articleFeedbackv5.startup", "ext.markAsHelpful"]);
}
</script>
<script src="/w/index.php?title=Special:BannerController&amp;cache=/cn.js&amp;303-4" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="//bits.wikimedia.org/en.wikipedia.org/load.php?debug=false&amp;lang=en&amp;modules=site&amp;only=scripts&amp;skin=vector&amp;*" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">if ( window.mediaWiki ) {
	mw.user.options.set({"ccmeonemails":0,"cols":80,"date":"default","diffonly":0,"disablemail":0,"disablesuggest":0,"editfont":"default","editondblclick":0,"editsection":1,"editsectiononrightclick":0,"enotifminoredits":0,"enotifrevealaddr":0,"enotifusertalkpages":1,"enotifwatchlistpages":0,"extendwatchlist":0,"externaldiff":0,"externaleditor":0,"fancysig":0,"forceeditsummary":0,"gender":"unknown","hideminor":0,"hidepatrolled":0,"highlightbroken":1,"imagesize":2,"justify":0,"math":1,"minordefault":0,"newpageshidepatrolled":0,"nocache":0,"noconvertlink":0,"norollbackdiff":0,"numberheadings":0,"previewonfirst":0,"previewontop":1,"quickbar":5,"rcdays":7,"rclimit":50,"rememberpassword":0,"rows":25,"searchlimit":20,"showhiddencats":false,"showjumplinks":1,"shownumberswatching":1,"showtoc":1,"showtoolbar":1,"skin":"vector","stubthreshold":0,"thumbsize":4,"underline":2,"uselivepreview":0,"usenewrc":0,"watchcreations":1,"watchdefault":0,"watchdeletion":0,"watchlistdays":3,"watchlisthideanons":0,
	"watchlisthidebots":0,"watchlisthideliu":0,"watchlisthideminor":0,"watchlisthideown":0,"watchlisthidepatrolled":0,"watchmoves":0,"wllimit":250,"flaggedrevssimpleui":1,"flaggedrevsstable":0,"flaggedrevseditdiffs":true,"flaggedrevsviewdiffs":false,"vector-simplesearch":1,"useeditwarning":1,"vector-collapsiblenav":1,"usebetatoolbar":1,"usebetatoolbar-cgd":1,"wikilove-enabled":1,"variant":"en","language":"en","searchNs0":true,"searchNs1":false,"searchNs2":false,"searchNs3":false,"searchNs4":false,"searchNs5":false,"searchNs6":false,"searchNs7":false,"searchNs8":false,"searchNs9":false,"searchNs10":false,"searchNs11":false,"searchNs12":false,"searchNs13":false,"searchNs14":false,"searchNs15":false,"searchNs100":false,"searchNs101":false,"searchNs108":false,"searchNs109":false,"gadget-teahouse":1,"gadget-mySandbox":1,"gadget-wmfFR2011Style":1});;mw.user.tokens.set({"editToken":"+\\","watchToken":false});;mw.loader.state({"user.options":"ready","user.tokens":"ready"});
	
	/* cache key: enwiki:resourceloader:filter:minify-js:4:592424c258259744d97ac0a8c844c34b */
}
</script><script src="//geoiplookup.wikimedia.org/" type="text/javascript"></script><!-- Served by mw52 in 0.075 secs. -->
	</body>
</html>
