HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:37:44 GMT
Server: .V04 Apache
Filter-Revision: 1.217
Last-Modified: Tue Sep  1 23:09:26 2009 GMT
Content-length: 18066
Keep-Alive: timeout=999999, max=999999
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Type: text/html
X-Pad: avoid browser bug

<html>
<head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"><meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0"><meta name="ProgId" content="FrontPage.Editor.Document">
<title>LawSchool.com, LawTV's site for law students, lawyers, future lawyers, law profs, college students studying for the LSAT, and law school graduates taking the bar exam. </title>
<meta name="keywords" content="top law schools,lawschool,law school ranking,mpre,mbe,uniform bar exam,uniform bar review,online law school,prelaw,qltt,news,Manhattan Law School,LSAT,legal education,lawschool.com,law lists,free legal research,bar review course,best law schools,top law schools">
<meta name="description" content="Law School Online. LawSchool.com is where law students, future law students, lawyers, and other legal professionals begin their legal search.">
<base target="_blank">
</head>
<body background="dotted.bmp">

<p align="center"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5038485920097963";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
//2007-11-01: Law School
google_ad_channel = "5695871906";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>

<p align="center"><font face="Arial" size="5">
 <a href="http://www.ChessLaw.com"><b>ChessLaw</b></a> | <font color="#0000FF"><b>LawDictionary</b>.com</font>
| </font><a href="http://www.FreeLegalResearch.com"><font face="Arial" size="5"><b>FreeLegalResearch</b>.com</font></a><font face="Arial" size="5">
<br>
 <a href="http://www.FreeMPRE.com"><b>FreeMPRE</b>.com</a> | <a href="http://www.FreeBarReview.com"><b>FreeBarReview</b>.com</a>
| <a href="http://www.buyingpower.com"><b>BuyingPower</b>.com</a>&nbsp;|
<a href="http://www.LawTV.com"><b>LawTV</b></a>&nbsp; <a href="http://www.FreeBarReview.com"><br>
</a><a href="http://www.ManhattanLawSchool.com"><b>Manhattan Law School</b></a>&nbsp;|
<b><a href="http://www.lawfirm250.com"><font color="#FF0000">Law Firm 250</font></a></b>
| <a href="http://www.EnPassant.com"><b>EnPassant</b>.com</a>
 | <a href="http://www.tvtoday.com"><b>TVToday</b>.com</a>
<br>
<a href="http://www.LawSchool100.com"><b>Law School 100</b></a>
 | <a href="http://www.LawCentral.com"><b>Law Central</b></a> | <a href="http://www.BarPlus.com"><b>BarPlus
Bar Review</b></a>&nbsp;| <a href="http://www.ExpertWitnesses.com"><b>ExpertWitnesses.com</b></a></font></p>
<p align="center"><!-- SiteSearch Google -->
<form method="get" action="http://www.google.com/custom" target="google_window">
<table border="0" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<tr><td nowrap="nowrap" valign="top" align="left" height="32">
<a href="http://www.google.com/">
<img src="http://www.google.com/logos/Logo_25wht.gif" border="0" alt="Google" align="middle"></img></a>
</td>
<td nowrap="nowrap">
<input type="hidden" name="domains" value="www.LawSchool.com"></input>
<label for="sbi" style="display: none">Enter your search terms</label>
<input type="text" name="q" size="31" maxlength="255" value="" id="sbi"></input>
<label for="sbb" style="display: none">Submit search form</label>
<input type="submit" name="sa" value="Search" id="sbb"></input>
</td></tr>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td nowrap="nowrap">
<table>
<tr>
<td>
<input type="radio" name="sitesearch" value="" checked id="ss0"></input>
<label for="ss0" title="Search the Web"><font size="-1" color="#000000">Web</font></label></td>
<td>
<input type="radio" name="sitesearch" value="www.LawSchool.com" id="ss1">
<label for="ss1" title="Search www.LawSchool.com"><font size="-1" color="#000000"><a href="http://www.LawSchool.com">www.LawSchool.com</a></font></label></td>
</tr>
</table>
<input type="hidden" name="client" value="pub-5038485920097963">
<input type="hidden" name="forid" value="1">
<input type="hidden" name="channel" value="9385155236">
<input type="hidden" name="ie" value="ISO-8859-1">
<input type="hidden" name="oe" value="ISO-8859-1">
<input type="hidden" name="safe" value="active">
<input type="hidden" name="flav" value="0000">
<input type="hidden" name="sig" value="Sg4CHkGcWh8ieULg">
<input type="hidden" name="cof" value="GALT:#008000;GL:1;DIV:#336699;VLC:663399;AH:center;BGC:FFFFFF;LBGC:336699;ALC:0000FF;LC:0000FF;T:000000;GFNT:0000FF;GIMP:0000FF;FORID:1">
<input type="hidden" name="hl" value="en">
</td></tr></table>
</form>
<p align="left">
<!-- SiteSearch Google --><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<p class="dateline">August 31, 2009</p>
<h1>They're Back, and They're Bad: Campus-Gossip Web Sites</h1>
<div class="image landscape-large">
  <img alt="They're Back, and They're Bad: Campus Gossip Web Sites 1" src="photo_1495_landscape_large.jpg" width="300" height="200">
  <p class="caption">&quot;What's the dirt?&quot; asks a query on the Campus
  Gossip Web site, one of several new sites publishing nasty comments about
  students. The site's owners are not legally required to remove malicious
  material at a student's request, a spokesman said.
</div>
<div class="article-body">
  <p class="byline">By Jeffrey R. Young</p>
  <p class="byline">Chronicle of Higher Education</p>
  <p>Students have more ways than ever to post anonymous attacks on classmates,
  thanks (or rather, no thanks) to new and expanded online forums promising to
  be bigger and juicier than the infamous JuicyCampus, which drew fierce
  protests from harassed students before it shut down earlier this year.</p>
  <p>&quot;This is the new JuicyCampus,&quot; says a note at Campus Gossip,
  which boasts campus-specific message boards for hundreds of colleges and
  encourages anonymous and racy barbs such as &quot;These Fellas got
  herpes,&quot; with a list of names attached. Going even further than its
  predecessor, there's also a photo section where students can post embarrassing
  pictures and videos of others.</p>
  <p>The site is planning a back-to-school marketing push, including a happy
  hour near Arizona State University where a rap artist named Sabotage will
  perform a song about the pleasures of campus gossip.</p>
  <p>Another site, CollegeACB (the letters stand for Anonymous Confession
  Board), paid the defunct JuicyCampus $10,000 to redirect visitors from its Web
  address to CollegeACB.</p>
  <p>These spawn of JuicyCampus are likely to give college administrators grief
  this academic year, and some legal experts say current laws will not help them
  fight back.</p>
  <p>High-school students have also gotten into the act. A forum called Peoples
  Dirt hosts discussion boards aimed at students, organized by state. This year
  Maryland's attorney general opened an investigation into the site, describing
  it in a written statement as &quot;home almost exclusively to abusive,
  harmful, and embarrassing personal attacks on high-school-aged children.&quot;
  Peoples Dirt recently added a few college-focused sections, including a
  message board aimed at students at the University of Maryland at College Park.</p>
  <p>For those who missed the drama over JuicyCampus, that site encouraged
  students to talk trash about their peers in an anonymous forum. A few students
  sued; several student governments passed resolutions condemning the site; at
  least two colleges blocked campus access to it; and the attorneys general in
  two states opened investigations into its business practices. None of the
  those actions seemed to have much impact, however, and the site's operator,
  Matt Ivester, remained defiant. Money does have an impact, though, and the
  site shut down in February citing a lack of advertising revenue.</p>
  <p>But it doesn't take much cash to operate such a service, and operators of
  newer sites vow to continue no matter what.</p>
  <p>Some legal scholars argue that the only effective way to keep such toxic
  forums from emerging is to amend federal communication laws�though doing so
  would raise tricky free-speech issues.</p>
  <p>In the meantime, some college administrators see controversies over gossip
  sites as a chance to talk about the damage that sexism, racism, and homophobia
  can do.</p>
  <h4 class="CHE-5-column-News subhead">Similar to Celebrity Tabloids?</h4>
  <p>Purveyors of college-gossip sites generally laugh off criticism of their
  creations, painting their detractors as people who simply can't take a joke.
  The forums are like a playful simulation of celebrity tabloids, they say,
  where people on campuses are trashed or defended like Hollywood A-listers.
  Plus, the owners point to threads where students talk about which fraternities
  have the best parties or which sororities have the prettiest members as
  evidence that the sites offer harmless entertainment.</p>
  <p>That playful defense breaks down, however, when you take a look at the
  derogatory and nasty statements that are posted. A discussion thread on
  CollegeACB lists &quot;sluts&quot; at California State University at Chico,
  naming women on the campus whom the anonymous posters claim to have had sex
  with. A recent posting at Peoples Dirt expresses a wish that a group of girls
  listed in a discussion thread would &quot;die in there sleep and everyone just
  forgets about them.&quot;</p>
  <p>In some cases, postings on the sites may cause harm to reputations, with
  serious impacts on students if the messages are seen by future employers or
  potential suitors. Unlike slurs scrawled on bathroom walls, online posts can
  be more public, and more lasting.</p>
  <p>&quot;Internet shaming creates an indelible blemish on a person's
  identity,&quot; wrote Daniel J. Solove, a professor of law at George
  Washington University, in his 2007 book, <em><a href="http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dsolove/Future-of-Reputation/">The
  Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet</a></em>
  (Yale University Press). &quot;It's similar to being forced to wear a digital
  scarlet letter or being branded or tattooed. People acquire permanent digital
  baggage. They are unable to escape their past, which is forever etched into
  Google's memory.&quot;</p>
  <p>Site administrators for both Campus Gossip and CollegeACB say they will
  remove abusive comments and respond to complaints from readers�something
  JuicyCampus rarely did.</p>
  <p>Peter Frank, a sophomore at Wesleyan University who runs CollegeACB, told
  me he tries to &quot;minimize damage while still maintaining the site's
  purpose&quot; by complying with such requests.</p>
  <p>Just how responsive the sites are to take-down requests remains to be seen,
  since students are just now arriving on campuses for the fall semester.
  &quot;We technically don't have to take anything down, based on what we've
  been told by our lawyers,&quot; a leader of Campus Gossip told me recently. He
  refused to give his real name, explaining that every employee of the site goes
  by the pseudonym Lance Lohan. &quot;We choose to do that just to stay on the
  safe side of things.&quot;</p>
  <p>So far the courts have largely agreed with &quot;Mr. Lohan,&quot; to the
  frustration of Mr. Solove.</p>
  <p>&quot;I don't see why it has to be that way,&quot; the law professor told
  me in a recent interview. &quot;Just like when you drive, it's not a
  free-for-all,&quot; he added, equating the current laws governing online
  forums to a road without traffic lights or stop signs. &quot;It's like if we
  looked at the roads and said, There's just nothing to be done�let's just
  abolish all rules of the road.&quot;</p>
  <h4 class="CHE-5-column-News subhead">Are Colleges Required to Act?</h4>
  <p>An incident at Hofstra University in January raised the question of whether
  colleges are already obliged to intervene when one of their students is a
  target on a gossip Web site. A female student found her name posted on
  JuicyCampus in a message calling her a &quot;slut,&quot; a &quot;whore,&quot;
  and other, more colorful and sexually explicit names. The student's mother
  contacted a dean at the university, asking the institution to block access to
  JuicyCampus or take other action to remove the slurs, but she says
  administrators told her that since the forum operated outside the university's
  control, there was nothing they could do. That was the position most colleges
  took when faced with similar situations.</p>
  <p>So the parent filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education's
  Office for Civil Rights, arguing that under Title IX, the federal
  gender-equity law, the university must respond to any sexual-harassment
  incident involving students, even if it takes place in an online forum. The
  complaint argued that real harm was done to the female student by the
  comments, and that the &quot;gender- and sex-specific harassment has
  interfered with her ability to learn in an environment of equal educational
  opportunity.&quot;</p>
  <p>In August the Education Department issued its ruling in the case. It found
  that because the comments were posted anonymously and not necessarily by
  students, and because the mother who complained did not identify her daughter
  by name so that the university could follow up, &quot;the university had
  insufficient information to investigate or otherwise respond to the
  complainant's concerns.&quot; Officials at Hofstra say that they take such
  incidents seriously, and that they advised the mother to have her daughter
  report the conduct to the campus police (which she did not do).</p>
  <p>Security on Campus, an advocacy group that represented the student in the
  case, said it planned to appeal the ruling. It also issued a news release
  claiming victory, arguing that the department's willingness to even consider
  the complaint means that gossip Web sites fall under Title IX guidelines.</p>
  <p>Other observers, though, said the ruling gave no help to other college
  officials wondering if they would have to respond if they knew the identity of
  the victim and had reason to believe the anonymous attackers were also
  students.</p>
  <p>Danielle Citron, a law professor at the University of Maryland at
  Baltimore, said she hoped that stamping out harassment on campus-gossip Web
  sites would be considered a matter of civil rights.</p>
  <p>She makes the case in an article published in the <em>Michigan Law Review</em>
  this year called <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1352442">&quot;Law's
  Expressive Value in Combating Cyber Gender Harassment.&quot;</a> In it, she
  argues that law-enforcement officials fail to take seriously complaints about
  online anonymous comments, and that using &quot;civil-rights remedies&quot;
  may be the most effective way to pursue such acts.</p>
  <p>&quot;Women should not have to wait until cyberharassment fulminates into
  physical violence for law enforcement to address it,&quot; she wrote. &quot;A
  civil-rights agenda � would demonstrate that the Internet is not the lawless
  Wild West, just as court settlements and state legislation made clear that the
  home does not insulate abusing husbands from societal intervention.&quot;</p>
  <p>I asked Ms. Citron whether writing about the newest campus-gossip sites in
  this newspaper could do more harm than good, by helping to publicize the sites
  and bring them visitors. No, she answered, making the case that administrators
  can't just look away as these incidents continue.</p>
  <p>&quot;These sites are like termites,&quot; she said. &quot;We can't pretend
  they're not there, because they're rotting out the house.&quot;</p>
  <p><em>College 2.0 explores how new technologies are changing colleges. Please
  send ideas to jeff.young@chronicle.com.</em></p>
</div>
<p align="center">
<font size="7" face="Arial"><b><a href="http://www.abajournal.com/weekly/law_applications_surge_at_some_schools_but_national_increase_is_less_than_1">
<br>
<br>
</a></b></font>
<br>
<p align="center"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-5038485920097963";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
google_ad_format = "728x90_as";
google_ad_type = "text";
//2007-11-01: Law School
google_ad_channel = "5695871906";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>

<p align="center"><font face="Arial" size="5">

<script type="text/javascript"><!--
 var jv=1.0;
//--></script>
<script type="text/javascript" language=Javascript1.1><!--
 jv=1.1;
//--></script>
<script type="text/javascript" language=Javascript1.2><!--
 jv=1.2;
//--></script>
<script type="text/javascript" language=Javascript1.3><!--
 jv=1.3;
//--></script>
<script type="text/javascript" language=Javascript1.4><!--
 jv=1.4;
//--></script>
<script type="text/javascript" ><!--
 function SiteStats_9357(){
  var t=new Date();
  var o='o='+t.getTimezoneOffset()+';';
  t=t.getTime();
  var isNN4=(document.layers)?true:false;
  var isCSS=(document.all)?true:false;
  var t='t='+t+';';
  var b='b='+(isCSS?(document.body.clientWidth+'x'+document.body.clientHeight):isNN4?(innerWidth+'x'+innerHeight):'')+';';
  var s='s='+(isCSS||isNN4?(screen.width+'x'+screen.height):'')+';';
  var c='c='+(isCSS||isNN4?screen.colorDepth :'')+';';
  var j='j='+jv+';'
  var p='p='+escape(location.href)+';';
  var r='r='+escape(document.referrer)+';';
  var u='http://www.lawschool.com/cgi-bin/sitestats.gif?'+t+b+s+c+j+o+p+r;
  document.write('<img src='+u+' width=1 height=1 style="position:absolute">');
  var f='var e=new Date();e=e.getTime();var I=new Image(1,1);I.src="'+u+'e="+e+";";';
  window.onunload=new Function(f);
  setTimeout('alive_9357("'+u+'")',0x249F0);
 }
 function alive_9357(u){
  var e=new Date();var I=new Image(1,1); I.src=u+'alive=1;t='+e.getTime(); setTimeout('alive_9357("'+u+'")',0x249F0);
 }
 SiteStats_9357();
//--></script><noscript><img src="http://www.lawschool.com/cgi-bin/sitestats.gif?p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawschool.com%2Fnewjuicy.htm;r=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawschool.com%2F;" width=1 height=1 alt="sitestats"></noscript></body>

</html>