New Economy | Companies | Infrastructure | Economy | Finance | Stocks | Forex | Commodities | World | Politics | Editorial | Broking | Features | Investor's Guide | Brand Equity | Corporate Dossier | Free Email | Chat | Message Boards | Help/Feedback
The Economic Times
    
ET India Directory Biz sites Images
  Budget 2001
  Frontpage
  ET Headlines
  New Economy
  Companies
  Infrastructure
  Economy
  Finance
  Stocks
  Forex
  Commodities
  World
  Politics
  Editorial
  Features
  Cartoons
  Specials
  Magazines
    Investor's Guide
     Brand Equity
     Corporate Dossier
  ET Invest
  ET Intelligence
  ET Services
    Bill Pay
     Remit2India
     Broking
     Newsletter
     Message Board
     Chat
     E-mail
  Archives
  Sitemap

 
 
Friday Mar 09 2001 | Updated 0022 hrs IST 1352 EST
Panel questions Bhadravati, Patalganga projects viability
c:\etonline\html\09infr02.gif
Girish Kuber
MUMBAI
THE MADHAV Godbole review committee yesterday questioned the viability of two major power projects, Ispat group’s 1,082-MW Bhadravati project and Reliance’s 447-MW Patalganga project.

“In the light of Maharashtra State Electricity Board’s inability to pay Enron’s Dabhol Power Company’s burden, the demand for escrow cover from these two companies looks unrealistic and hence unaffordable for the state,” the committee is reported to have observed.

Since, the Reliance project is proposed to be run on imported naphtha, MSEB officials had said that power purchased from it could prove to be as costly as that from DPC. Ispat’s project, which is one of the fast-track projects, has been hanging fire for over eight years.

“Can you go ahead with the project without the escrow cover”, the committee is believed to have asked the representatives of Ispat and Reliance, to which the reply was negative.

Ispat officials confirmed the development and said that in the absence of escrow cover, MSEB should be asked to provide some alternate security mechanism.

Meanwhile, the committee’s suggestion that licensees like BSES and TEC buy the power from Enron and sell it to their customers has been turned down by these power utilities.

As reported by ET on Wednesday, the committeehad suggested a proposal that in order to resolve DPC’s payment issue, these utilities could buy power from it and ensure supply to the entire city. Both these companies appear to have turned down the proposal.

“Both TPC and BSES are in no mood to bail out the ailing MSEB by purchasing power from DPC,” highly placed government sources told ET.

“TEC already has adequate generation capacity and two per cent excess power which is around Rs 2.80 per unit. Why should we buy DPC’s costly power,” TEC MD Adi Engineer said.

According to BSES technical director S S Dua, company’s CMD RV Shahi had made it clear to the Godbole committee that BSES was not ready to purchase power from DPC.
Previous    Next 

 

Enron invokes counter-guarantee again

Panel questions Bhadravati, Patalganga projects viability

Meagre $180-m aid to hit power reforms

World’s oldest refinery in Assam facing closure

APTransco backs hike in wheeling charge



I n d i a ' s  N o 1  B u s i n e s s  N e w s p a p e r
  
Copyright © 2000 Times Internet Limited. All rights reserved. | Terms of Use | Feedback | Sitemap