Enron, the story that broke too late
HOWARD KURTZ
Bethany McLean, 31, a Fortune magazine reporter with
an impossibly soft voice, decided to take a hard look at Enron
last January. The Houston energy company didn’t like her questions.
The CEO, Jeffrey Skilling, called her unethical and hung up
on her. The chairman, Kenneth Lay, called Fortune’s managing
editor to complain. The chief financial officer, Andrew Fastow,
flew to New York to tell McLean and her editors that Enron
was in great shape.
McLean refused to be intimidated. ‘‘The company remains largely
impenetrable to outsiders,’’ she wrote in Fortune’s March
5, 2001, issue. ‘‘How exactly does Enron make its money? Details
are hard to come by because Enron keeps many of the specifics
confidential. ... Analysts don’t seem to have a clue.’’ The
story sank without a trace.
‘‘At that point the coverage of Enron was pretty glowing,’’
McLean says. The stock had soared 90% the previous year and
was selling for $76 a share. Now that the company has collapsed
amid charges of financial chicanery, devastating its employees’
retirement funds, Enron is the hottest story in the country.
Political reporters joined the fray after learning that Enron
had sought help from the Bush White House. Teams of business
journalists are digging into the largest corporate meltdown
in American history. But, as in the savings and loan debacle
a dozen years ago, it took news organisations too long to
piece together the clues.
‘‘It’s fair to say the press did not do a great job in covering
Enron,’’ says Steve Shepard, editor in chief of Business Week
magazine, which ran briefs on the company’s financial problems
until a cover story in November. ‘‘Enron was really a systemic
failure of all the checks and balances we have on corporate
governance: integrity of management, board of directors, audit
committee of the board, outside accounting firm, Wall Street
analysts and ultimately the press. And all of us failed.’’
Last May, the Wall Street Journal ran a front-page
story on Lay getting a half-hour meeting to lobby Vice President
Cheney on the administration’s energy programme. The story
noted that over the years Enron had donated nearly $2 million
to Bush, Lay’s longtime friend. ‘‘I feel pretty good about
what we’ve done on Enron,’’ says Alan Murray, Washington bureau
chief. ‘‘What we did not understand was that it was heading
for a disaster.’’
The problem, he says, is that such stories often turn on ‘‘arcane
and technical’’ practices. ‘‘The press doesn’t pay as much
attention to some of these regulatory issues that have more
impact on the world than the political issues we do pay attention
to,’’ Murray says.
A dramatic decline in stock isn’t necessarily a warning of
foul play, adds Larry Kramer, chief executive of CBS MarketWatch.com,
noting that his own company went public at $97 a share and
the stock is now worth $4. ‘‘People just got dazzled by the
size of the business,’’ he says of Enron.
Most Wall Street analysts had a buy rating on Enron stock.
Indeed, only one group wanted Enron’s stock to tank: the short-sellers,
professional traders who bet on a stock’s decline. One short-seller,
Jim Chanos of ynikos Associates, suggested to Fortune’s McLean
that she look at Enron’s Form 10-K, a required annual filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. McLean says she
was struck by the document. There were ‘‘strange transactions,’’
‘‘erratic cash flow’’ and huge debt. ‘‘It made you wonder,
if their business was so phenomenally profitable, why they
had to be adding debt at such a rapid rate,’’ she says. But
the story was hard to write: ‘‘You can’t just spout off about
derivatives and expect people to get it.’’
Ironically, Fortune’s own surveys had named Enron America’s
most innovative firm for six straight years, and much of the
coverage was similarly upbeat. Last January, a Houston
Chronicle story was headlined: ‘‘Houston has $100 billion
company; Enron Corp. sets records for sales, earnings in 2000.’’
There were a few critical pieces, but they mainly focused
on politics.
Now that Enron’s stock has been booted off the New York Stock
Exchange, Fortune staffers can’t say enough about the way
McLean defied both Enron and conventional wisdom. ‘‘It was
a gutsy thing to do,’’ Kirkland says. ‘‘When you look back
it’s obvious: Why weren’t we all asking these questions?’’
(LA Times-Washington Post)
|