Life comes with a price tag
One Prabhat Kumar doesn’t make a crusade
As
his name implies, Bishop Chrysostom of the Mar Thoma Syrian
Church is ‘‘golden tongued’’. There is a whole thick book
of his anecdotes that make the reader think and laugh. My
favourite is about his visit to a jail where the prisoners
were reluctant to open up to the bishop, who was attired in
his colourful cassock. Suddenly the bishop enlivened the atmosphere
when he told the prisoners, ‘‘Don’t worry, we are all in the
same boat. The only difference is that you have been caught
while I have not been.’’ The wall of silence collapsed and,
thereafter, Chrysostom had a long interaction with the jail
inmates. I was reminded of this story when the former governor
of Jharkhand, Prabhat Kumar, was forced to resign from the
governorship for allegedly hosting parties, the bills of which
were picked up by a questionable character who is now in police
custody. He reportedly hosted these parties when he was the
Cabinet Secretary, the highest post a civil servant can aspire
to in this country.
Like the prisoners in the story, the only
difference between Kumar and many others is that he has been
caught while others have not. If the exacting standards that
have been applied to the former governor is applied to many
others who throw parties on flimsy grounds, many a reputation
will fall like nine pins.
|
Institutions no longer pay a ‘bribe’ or ‘speed money’. Instead, they employ consultants who are paid consultancy fee, which is an euphemism for a bribe
|
|
Just a week ago, film star Amitabh Bachchan
and the company he keeps these days went to Etawah in UP in
several chartered planes for a ‘blood donation camp’. At this
camp, the reports said, 110 persons donated blood ‘‘which
would be useful for our jawans in case there is a war’’ as
Mulayam Singh Yadav piously stated on that occasion. There
is no clue as to how many lakhs of rupees were spent on the
camp and who paid the bills while a small group I know spent
as little as a few hundred rupees to organise a similar camp
in Delhi where 170 people donated blood to the Red Cross.
The Etawah camp may, of course, be viewed as part of surrogate
election campaigning and hence condonable. But politicians
and bureaucrats are not alone in this business of partying.
In my previous job, I had a journalist colleague who celebrated
his birthday, some say his wedding anniversary, every year
in grand style. Union Cabinet ministers, chief ministers and
senior bureaucrats used to flock to the do in large numbers.
If he had not retired a few years ago, his parties would have
been the stuff of society columns that metropolitan newspapers
carry these days. Needless to say, parties of this kind are
invariably symptomatic of the extent of corruption in the
country.
To cite one specific case, there is a small
office of the Registrar of Cooperative Societies on Delhi’s
Parliament Street, adjacent to the police station. The employees
may be in humbler circumstances but does anyone have a clue
as to the amount of money they rake in on the side? Ask any
of the thousands of cooperative housing societies that have
come up in the Capital whether their files are cleared without
paying huge bribes. The answer would definitely be in the
negative, and I have personal experience of this. It was said
of Lord Clive of the infamous Battle of Plassey, ‘‘We may
safely affirm that no Englishman who started with nothing
has ever, in any line of life, created such a fortune at the
early age of 34.’’ It would not be inappropriate to say the
same about many an employee of the Registrar’s office, although
it would be improper to single them out when corruption is
so rampant and widespread. What is overlooked is that it is
usually the consumer, in this case the flat-owner, who has
to pay these Johnnies through the nose.
It was just the other day that two residents
of downtown Lajpat Nagar died of heart attack when the bulldozers
of the Delhi Municipal Corporation began demolishing those
portions of their buildings which were illegal. That reminded
me of one early morning when a jeep full of Delhi policemen
visited one of my neighbours. It was out of concern for my
neighbour’s welfare that I rushed to his house. But it came
as a shock when he said there was nothing to worry about as
the police had come only to collect some money from him for
constructing an additional (illegal) floor. No illegal building
ever comes up overnight and it is possible only because some
authority at the local level took a bribe when it was being
constructed.
Small wonder that corruption has more or
less been institutionalised. Companies and institutions no
longer pay a ‘bribe’ or ‘speed money’. Instead, they employ
consultants who are paid consultancy fees, which is an euphemism
for a bribe. No wonder government officials these days insist
on the appointment of consultants if one has to deal with
them.
As a nation, we woke up to the danger of
corruption only when the Dubai-based mastermind of the terrorist
attack on the American Center in Kolkata managed to get an
Indian passport. It cost him only Rs 500, paid to the right
person in the Superintendent of Police’s office in Nawada.
The hijackers of the Indian Airlines aircraft from Kathmandu
in 1999 were also found to be in possession of passports issued
by the Mumbai passport office. Whereas dreaded terrorists
have their way, my son failed to get a domicile certificate
from the officer concerned in Tis Hazari, despite producing
all the certificates, including a certificate of introduction
from an IAS officer. Instead, if he had gone through the tout
and paid his fee, he would have got the certificate and been
saved the bother of visiting his office several times. That
is what the more sensible do these days, although according
to the penal code, giving a bribe is as much an offence as
accepting one.
Now we all know that Enron thrived on corrupt
practices and fudged accounts. In the US and in Britain, the
spotlight is presently on those who accepted favours from
the power major and they include President George W. Bush
and Prince Charles. The manner in which Enron’s Dabhol project
was pushed through and the way in which it obtained counter-guarantees
from the Central government is scandalous. Enron is on record
for stating the company had spent Rs 60 crore on ‘‘educating
Indians’’. Surely, some bigwigs in the government pocketed
this sum as a result of which the Indian state is losing more
than Rs 1 crore a day on this ill-fated project.
About 245 years ago, a certain Mir Jafar
entered into a deal with Lord Clive for his private benefits.
He betrayed the nawab and this marked the beginning of the
British rule in this country. Around this time the Dutch equivalent
of the East India Company, VOC, which had preceded the British
into the Indian waters, was brimming with corrupt practices.
Small wonder it did not last long and, on its demise, its
logo came to be read as Vergaan onder Corruptie (Perished
by Corruption). Let this not happen to our country and society.
One Prabhat Kumar does not make an anti-corruption crusade.
Shekhar Gupta’s ‘National Interest’ column will appear next Saturday
|
|